Objective To investigate the accuracy and safety of percutaneous screw fixation for pelvic and acetabular fractures with remote navigation of orthopedic robot based on 5G technology. Methods Between January 2021 and December 2021, 15 patients with pelvic and/or acetabular fractures were treated with percutaneous screws fixation which were placed by remote navigation of orthopedic robot based on 5G technology. There were 8 males and 7 females. The age ranged from 20 to 98 years, with an average of 52.1 years. The causes of trauma included traffic accident injury in 6 cases, falling from height injury in 6 cases, fall injury in 2 cases, and heavy object smashing injury in 1 case. The time from injury to operation ranged from 3 to 32 days, with an average of 10.9 days. There were 8 cases of simple pelvic fractures, 2 simple acetabular fractures, and 5 both pelvic and acetabular fractures. There were 7 cases of pelvic fractures of Tile type B2, 2 type B3, 1 type C1, and 3 type C2; 4 cases of unilateral anterior column fracture of the acetabulum, 2 bilateral anterior column fractures, and 1 anterior wall fracture. CT images within 5 days after operation were collected for screw position assessment. The screw planning time and guidewire placement time were recorded, as well as the presence of intraoperative adverse events and complications within 5 days after operation. Results All patients achieved satisfactory surgical results. A total of 36 percutaneous screws were inserted (20 sacroiliac screws, 6 LC Ⅱ screws, 9 anterior column screws, and 1 acetabular apical screw). In terms of screw position evaluation, 32 screws (88.89%) were excellent and 4 screws (11.11%) were good; there was no screw penetrating cortical bone. The screw planning time ranged from 4 to 15 minutes, with an average of 8.7 minutes. The guidewire placement time ranged from 3 to 10 minutes, with an average of 6.8 minutes. The communication delayed in 2 cases, but the operation progress was not affected, and no serious intraoperative adverse events occurred. No delayed vascular or nerve injury, infection, or other complications occurred within 5 days after operation. No cases need surgical revision. ConclusionThe fixation of pelvic and acetabular fractures by percutaneous screw with remote navigation of orthopedic robot based on 5G technology is accurate, safe, and reliable.
ObjectiveTo understand the psychological pressure when the surgeon-in-chief remotely completes animal surgery using home-made Tumai surgical robot in combination with 5G network (Abbreviated as“remote robotic surgery” ), and investigate and analyze the sources of psychological pressure, and then provide evidence guidance for the training of surgeon in performing remote robotic surgery. MethodsA modified perceptual stress scale was used to conduct a questionnaire survey. The 44 surgeons-in-chief with robot operation qualification from 10 medical units in the Gansu Province recruited by Gansu Provincial People’s Hospital were as observation subject, who participated in the psychological stress validation test of remote robotic surgery, from September 4, 2022 to October 10, 2022. The difference of psychological stress before and after the test was compared. The stressor of surgeon-in-chief was analyzed by Likert scale. The animals in this study were swines. ResultsA total of 132 valid questionnaires were obtained from 44 surgeons-in-chief. The surgical physician’s perceived stress score after the test was statistically higher than before the test [(47.50±9.06) points vs. (38.34±5.55) points, mean difference and its 95% confidence interval=9.61 (7.00, 12.27), t=7.42, P<0.001]. The analysis results of multiple linear regression showed that the number of robotic surgery performed by the surgeon-in-chief in the past had a negative impact on the psychological pressure of the surgeon-in-chief after the test (β=–0.292, P=0.042); At the same time, the subjective perception data of the surgeon-in-chief, such as unstability of signal transmission and unskilled equipment manipulation by the surgeon had positive impacts on the psychological pressure of the surgeon-in-chief after the test (β=1.987, P=0.026; β=3.184, P=0.010), and the tacit understanding between the surgeon-in-chief and the first assistant had a negative impact on the psychological pressure of the surgeon-in-chief after the test (β=–2.185, P=0.047). ConclusionsAccording to the data from this study, remote robotic surgery will increase the psychological pressure of the surgeon-in-chief. Previous experience in robotic surgery can reduce psychological stress after surgery. The main sources of psychological pressure are unstability of signal transmission, unskilled equipment manipulation by the surgeon, and the tacit understanding between the surgeon-in-chief and the first assistant.