Objective To investigate the effectiveness of acetabular revision using jumbo cementless cups. Methods Between May 1996 and May 2011, 35 patients (35 hips) underwent an acetabular revision with jumbo cementless cups, and the clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. There were 12 males and 23 females, with an average age of 64.8 years (range, 47-79 years). The time from hip arthroplaty to revision was 1-15 years (mean, 9.7 years). The causes for revision were aseptic loosening in 32 cases, femoral periprosthetic fracture (Vancouver type B3) in 2 cases, and low toxicity infection in 1 case. According to the classification of acetabular bony deficiencies of the American Association of Orthopedic Surgeon (AAOS), 6 cases were classified as type I, 9 cases as type II, and 20 cases as type III; according to the classification proposed by Paprosky, 5 cases were rated as type II A, 9 cases as type II B, 13 cases as type II C, and 8 cases as type III A. The primary hip arthroplasty cups had an outside diameter of 46-52 mm (mean, 49.6 mm), and the revision cups had an outside diameter of 56-68 mm (mean, 60.4 mm). Harris score was used for hip function evaluation, and X-ray films were taken for imaging evaluation. Results Healing of incision by first intention was obtained in all patients; without infection or neurovascular injury. Prosthetic dislocation was observed in 1 case at 20 days after operation, and was cured after expectant treatment. One patient died at 6 years after operation, and the other 34 patients were followed up 2-14 years (mean, 8.4 years). The Harris score was significantly increased from 46.4 ± 13.4 at preoperation to 90.4 ± 3.6 at last follow-up (t=18.76, P=0.00). The distance between acetabular rotation centre and teardrop line was significantly decreased, and the distance between acetabular rotation centre and lateral teardrop was significantly increased when compared with preoperative ones (P lt; 0.05). Only 1 patient received second revision for aseptic loosening after 10 years; no continuous radiolucent line, prosthetic dislocation, and osteolysis was found, and bony ingrowth was shown in the other patients. Conclusion Jumbo cementless cup for acetabular revision can achieve good effectiveness for having the advantages of simple operation, less bone grafts, and good recovery of the acetabular rotation centre.
Objective To investigate the early-term effectiveness of extra-large uncemented acetabular components for hip revision in the treatment of extensive acetabular bone defect. Methods Between September 2008 and May 2012, 13 patients (13 hips) with extensive acetabular bone defect underwent first hip revision using extra-large uncemented acetabular components (Jumbo cup). The diameter of Jumbo cup was larger than or equal to 64 mm for male and 60 mm for female. There were 4 males and 9 females with an average age of 64.7 years (range, 58-84 years). The period from primary arthroplasty to revision was 3-16 years (mean, 9.6 years). According to Paprosky classification, acetabular bone defect was rated as stage IIA in 2 cases, as stage IIB in 5 cases, as stage IIC in 4 cases, and as stage IIIA in 2 cases. The preoperative vertical distance from the center of involved femoral head to interteardrop line was (21.2 ± 6.1) mm longer than that of normal side. The Harris score and the rotation center of hip were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively. Results Healing of incision by first intention was obtained in all patients, and no complication of dislocation, infection, and injury of sciatic nerve or femoral nerve occurred. The duration of follow-up ranged from 13 to 40 months (mean, 23.5 months). Partial or complete pain relief was achieved in all patients. The other patients could walk independently and restored to their routine jobs except for 1 case of hemiplegia caused by acute cerebral infarction at 3 months after surgery. In 5 patients with bone implantation, with the prolonging follow-up, the allograft could integrate with the host bone without absorption, and the bone fusion time was 9-35 months (mean, 14.5 months). At last follow-up, the X-ray films revealed that the vertical distance from the center of involved femoral head to interteardrop line was (6.0 ± 3.1) mm longer than that of normal side, which was significantly reduced when compared with preoperative value (t=11.13, P=0.00). No periprosthetic transparent region, prosthesis displacement, or screw breakage occurred. The Harris score was significantly increased from 30.4 ± 8.8 preoperatively to 85.1 ± 3.2 at last follow-up (t=22.11, P=0.00). Conclusion The application of extra-large uncemented acetabular components could be an effective technique for the reconstruction of extensive acetabular bone defect, and gain a good early-term effectiveness. The long-term survival rate of prostheses needs to be followed up.
Objective To investigate the effectiveness of two-stage revision of infected total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using an antibiotic-impregnated articulating cement spacer. Methods The clinical data were analyzed from 23 patients (23 knees) undergoing two-stage revision for late infection after primary TKA between January 2007 and December 2009. There were 15 males and 8 females, aged from 43 to 75 years (mean, 65.2 years). Infection occurred at 13-52 months (mean, 17.3 months) after TKA. The time interval between infection and admission ranged from 15 days to 7 months (mean, 2.1 months). One-stage operation included surgical debridement and removal of all knee prosthesis and cement, then an antibiotic-impregnated articulating cement spacer was implanted. The re-implantation of prosthesis was performed after 8-10 weeks when infections were controlled. The American Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score and Knee Society Score (KSS) were used to compare the function of the knee between pre- and post-revision. The rate of infection control and complication were analyzed. Results All incisions healed primarily. Re-infection occurred in 2 cases after two-stage revision, and infection was controlled in the other 21 cases, with an infection control rate of 91.3%. The patients were followed up 2-5 years (mean, 3.6 years). The HSS score was increased from 60.6 ± 9.8 at pre-revision to 82.3 ± 7.4 at last follow-up, the KSS score was increased from 110.7 ± 9.6 at pre-revision to 134.0 ± 10.5 at last follow-up, all showing significant differences (P lt; 0.01). Radiographs showed that prosthesis had good position with no loosening, fracture, or periprosthetic radiolucent. Conclusion Two-stage revision using an antibiotic-impregnated articulating cement spacer is an effective method to control infected TKA and to restore the function of affected knee.
【Abstract】 Objective To evaluate the outcome of two-stage revision for prostheses infection in patients with bone tumor after knee prosthetic replacement. Methods Between August 2003 and August 2010, 22 patients with prostheses infection, who underwent knee prosthetic replacement in limb salvage treatment because of bone tumor, received two-stage revision. There were 11 males and 11 females with an average age of 29.6 years (range, 15-55 years). Prosthetic infection occurred after primary replacement in 20 patients and after revision surgery in 2 patients from 15 days to 89 months after operation. According to Coventry and Fitzgerald classification, type I was found in 3 cases, type II in 15 cases, and type III in 4 cases. The time from infection to admission was 5-47 months (mean, 10.2 months). The results of bacterial culture were positive in 9 cases and negative in 13 cases. Two patients had fever and leukocytosis. In one-stage, the implants and infected tissue were removed, and an antibiotic cement spacer with an intramedullary nail was implanted. In two-stage, a new endoprosthesis was inserted after infection was controlled. Results The C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate before one-stage debridement were significantly higher than those before two-stage revision (P lt; 0.05). All patients were followed up 5-63 months (mean, 23.6 months). Infection was controlled after one-stage debridement in 18 cases (81.8%); two-stage revision was performed in 17 cases, and 1 case refused to receive two-stage revision. Of 17 patients, 1 patient was amputated because of infection at 5 months after revision. Four patients (18.2%) underwent amputation because of failure to control infection after one-stage debridement. The limb salvage rate was 77.3% (17/22). One case of renal cell carcinoma with bone metastasis died of original disease after 1 year and 6 months of operation. The Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS 93) score was 69.4 ± 12.7 at last follow-up. Conclusion Two-stage revision should be performed in time and it has good results in the treatment of prostheses infection in patients with bone sarcomas after knee prosthetic replacement.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of acetabulum reinforcement ring (Cage) with allograft bone for reconstructing acetabular defects in hip revision. Methods Between February 2006 and August 2010, 14 patients (14 hips) with serious acetabular bone defects after total hip arthroplasty underwent acetabular reconstruction by using Cage with allograft bone. There were 6 males and 8 females with a mean age of 59.2 years (range, 45-76 years). The mean time between first replacement and revision was 7.2 years (range, 5-12 years). The revision causes included infection in 8 cases, osteolysis and aseptic loosening in 6 cases. The hip function Harris score was 37.7 ± 5.3. According to America Association of Orthopedic Surgeon (AAOS) standard, the acetabular defect was classified as type III in 8 cases and as type IV in 6 cases. Results All incisions healed by first intention, and no complication occurred. The patients were followed up 14-62 months (mean, 44 months). The pain was relieved or disappeared. At last follow-up, the Harris score was 89.7 ± 3.2, showing significant difference when compared with preoperative score (t= — 44.40, P=0.04). No loosening of the acetabular component or osteolysis was found in 14 hips. No absorption or collapse of the allograft was observed in all patients. Conclusion Cage with allograft bone is a useful method of reconstructing acetabular bone defects in hip revision. Further follow-up is needed to assess the long-term effectiveness.
ObjectiveTo summarize the design and the biomechanical characteristics of Sivash-range of motion femoral modular stem (S-ROM) prosthesis and mainly to introduce its clinical use in developmental dysplasia of hip (DDH) and hip revision. MethodsLiterature concerning S-ROM prosthesis was extensively reviewed and analyzed. ResultsThe S-ROM prosthesis based on the modularity feature can reach press-fit in metaphysis and diaphysis of femur concurrently. Additionaly, S-ROM prosthesis can fit for anatomic differences of the DDH femur and is capable of use in correction osteotomy and hip revision. ConclusionModular junctions of S-ROM prosthesis increase the potentials of implant fracture and metallic debris production, so further follow-up study is needed to verify the long-term effectiveness.
Objective To evaluate the mid-term effectiveness of two-stage hip prosthesis revision in the treatment of infection after hip arthroplasty. Methods Between April 2002 and November 2006, 12 cases of infection after hip arthroplasty were treated. There were 5 males and 7 females, aged from 47 to 72 years (mean, 59.8 years). The femoral head arthroplasty wasperformed in 2 cases and total hip arthroplasty in 10 cases. Infection occurred 1 to 67 months after arthroplasty. According to the Segawa classification criteria, infections included type 2 in 1 case, type 3 in 2 cases, and type 4 in 9 cases. The preoperative Harris score was 36.7 ± 6.1. Nine cases had elevated C reactive protein and 10 cases had elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate. The results of bacterial culture were positive in 8 cases and negative in 4 cases. After the removal of the infected prosthesis and thorough debridement, antibiotic-loaded cement spacers or infected therapeutic temporary prosthesis were used as placeholders, and then the anti-infection treatments were given after operations; two-stage hip prosthesis revisions were performed 3 to 10 months after debridement. Results In 1 patient who failed to control infection after debridement, infection was controlled after the second debridement and the antibiotic-loaded cement spacer as placeholder. Other patients achieved heal ing of incision by first intention, and no compl ication such as deep venous thrombosis and nerve injury occurred. All patients were followed up 3 to 8 years after revision (mean, 5.4 years). During the follow-up, no infection recurrence and joint dislocation occurred. Dull pain was present in 2 cases during activity and mild claudication in 3 cases at last follow-up. The Harris score was 81.6 ± 4.5, showing significant difference (t=52.696, P=0.000) when compared with preoperative score. The X-ray films showed that noprosthesis loosening and obvious subsidence were observed, and bone graft healed. Conclusion The two-stage hip prosthesis revision has good infection control rate and mid-term effectiveness in treatment of infection after hip arthroplasty.
Objective To study the effect of vancomycin-loaded polymethylmethacrylate (VCMPMMA) in the treatment of an experimental hemiprosthetic hip infectionof rabbits. Methods The infected hemiprosthetic hip joints of the rabbits underwent debridement and one-stage revision arthroplasty. Requested by the “fixed” method, 24 rabbits were equally divided into 2 groups: the control group and theexperimental group. The prostheses were fixed with PMMA in the control group, but with VCM-PMMA in the experimental group. X-ray films were taken immediately after operation, and then 4, 8, and 12 weeks after operation. The C reactive protein (CRP) and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) were measured before operation, then measured 1, 3, and 7 days after operation, and then 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks after operation, i.e., they were measured at the above 8 time points. All the rabbits were sacrificed 12 weeks later. The cure rate of the infection was determined by the blood culture for the corresponding bacteria and the Rhodamine-labeled anti-Staphylococcus epidermidisimmune serum staining. Results The X-ray films revealed that6 hemiprosthetic hip joints were dislocated in the control group, but 3 in the experimental group; 58.3% and 16.7% of the hemiprosthetic hip joints were reinfected in the control group and the experimental group, respectively. At 8 weeks in the control group, the serum CRP level decreased to a greater extent than that measured at the time of debridement, but in the experimental group just at 2 weeks （Plt;0.01）. ESR remained elevated in the control group, but at 4 weeks ESR were significantly lowered compared with that measured at the time of debridement（Plt;0.01）. The test results for the pathogenic organisms revealed that the re-infection incidences were respectively 58.3% (7/12) and 16.7% (2/12) in the control group and the experimental group, with the successful revision rates of 41.7% and 83.3% respectively in the above 2 groups. The light microscopy revealed that therewas a heavy infiltration by the inflammatory cells in the reinfected tissues, but there was a proliferation of the fibrocytes in the tissues of the cured patients. Conclusion Onestage revision arthroplasty can significantly promote the control of the hemiprosthetic hip joint infection in rabbits by the use of VCM-PMMA.
Objective To review progress of clinical application ofmorselized bone and to investigate relative exploration on it.Methods The recent articles on morselized bone in the field of clinicand experimental research were extensively reviewed, and relative examination of morselized bone referring to method and mechanism were investigated carefully.Results Morselized bone worked well clinically, especially inrevision ofartificial total hip joint, and it was proved effective with lots of advantages.Conclusion Morselized bone functions well clinically. Although its mechanism requires a further research, it still has a promising value in clinical application.
Objective To investigate the change of the femoral offset and hip center of rotation (COR) after using Jumbo cups in total hip arthroplasty (THA) revision. Methods The clinical data of 23 patients who underwent THA revision using Jumbo cups between January 2010 and May 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. Morselized bone graft was performed on 8 cases, morselized bone graft combined with structural bone graft on 10 cases. There were 10 males and 13 females, aged 65.4 years on average (range, 51-77 years). The disease duration was 1-24 years (mean, 8.57 years). The reasons for revision included aseptic loosening in 21 cases and periprosthetic infection in 2 cases. The Harris hip score and visual analogue scale (VAS) were 43.04±5.05 and 5.70±0.97 before operation respectively. According to the Paprosky acetabular defect classification, there were 5 cases of type I, 5 cases of type II A, 3 cases of type II B, 6 cases of type II C, and 4 cases of type III A. The X-ray films showed that the femoral offset was (40.65±4.09) mm for normal side and was (44.04±5.08) mm for affected side at preoperation, showing significant difference (t=4.098,P=0.000). Ten patients underwent femoral offset reconstruction (43.48%) but 13 patients did not (56.52%) before operation. The COR was reconstructed in 10 cases (43.48%); COR elevation was observed in 11 cases (47.83%), and COR decline in 2 cases (8.69%) before operation. Results Primary healing of incision was obtained in all patients, with no complication of infection, vascular injury, deep vein thrombosis, dislocation of the joint, or fracture around prosthesis. All the patients were followed up 12-76 months (mean, 22.48 months). The Harris hip score and VAS were 82.09±4.53 and 0.74±0.62 at 1 year after operation respectively, showing significant differences when compared with preoperative scores (t=37.831,P=0.000;t=22.318,P=0.000). The X-ray films showed that the femoral offset was (43.87±3.57) mm for affected side at 1 year after operation, showing no significant difference when compared with preoperative one (t=0.250,P=0.805), but significant difference was found between affected side and normal side (t=5.591,P=0.000). The femoral offset was restored in 16 patients (69.57%) and was not restored in 7 patients (30.43%) after operation. The COR was restored in 15 patients (65.22%) and was not restored in 8 patients (34.78%). Conclusion Using Jumbo cups or combined with morselized or structural bone graft is effective in restoring hip COR and femoral offset at the maximum limit in THA revision, with good short-term outcome and improved stability of acetabular prosthesis.