ObjectiveTo investigate efficacy of total colectomy-ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) and subtotal colectomy-ileosigmoidal anastomosis (ISA) in treatment of patients with slow transit constipation (STC).MethodsThe clinical data of 45 patients with STC underwent operation from January 2008 to January 2015 were analyzed retrospectively. These patients were divided into an IRA group and ISA group according to the operation method, there were 23 cases in the IRA group and 22 cases in the ISA group. The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospitalization, use of antidiarrheal drugs, and complications rate in both groups were compared. All the patients were followed up at the 3th, 6th, 12th, and 24th month after the operation, the defecation frequency, Wexner continence score, Wexner anal incontinence score, gastrointestinal quality of life index score, abdominal pain frequency score, and abdominal distension frequency score in two groups were evaluated.ResultsThere were no significantly statistical differences between the two groups in the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative complications rate (P>0.05). In the perioperative period, compared with the IRA group, the ISA group had a shorter postoperative hospitalization and a relatively lower proportion of antidiarrheal drugs, the differences were statistically significant between the two groups (P<0.05). On the postoperative 3th, 6th, and 12th month, the frequency of defecation in the IRA group was significantly higher than that in the ISA group (P<0.05). The Wexner continence score, Wexner anal incontinence score, gastrointestinal quality of life index score, abdominal pain frequency score, and abdominal distension frequency score had no statistical differences between the two groups (P>0.05).ConclusionsISA and IRA are safe and effective in treatment of STC, it might be selected according to patient’s conditions. On premise of strictly grasping indications, ISA has more obvious advantages.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the functional outcomes and quality of life in patients with surgery for slow transit constipation (STC).MethodsFrom March 2013 to July 2017, 29 patients undergoing total or subtotal colectomy for STC in our department were analyzed prospectively. Their preoperative and postoperative 1-year follow-up details were analyzed. Evacuation function of all patients was assessed by bowel movements, abdominal pain, bloating, straining, laxative, enema use and the Wexner constipation scales. Quality of life was evaluated by the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) and the short-form (SF)-36 survey.ResultsA high number of patients (93.1%, 27/29) in STC stated that surgery received benefits to their health. Compared with that before operation, the number of bowel movements per week during a 1-year follow-up increased significantly (31.6±19.9 vs. 1.21±0.6, P<0.05). Significant trends toward improvement of bloating, straining, laxative and enema use were noted 1-year following surgery (P<0.05). The Wexner constipation scales scores during a 1-year follow-up decreased significantly (5.69±3.4 vs. 20.34±0.6, P<0.05). The GIQLI scores during a 1-year follow-up increased significantly (120.7±20.4 vs. 78.6±17.3, P<0.05). Moreover, results of SF-36 showed significant improvements in 7 spheres (role physical, role emotional, physical pain, vitality, mental health, social function and general health) during a 1-year follow-up compared with those before operation (P<0.05).ConclusionTotal or subtotal colectomy for STC did not only alleviate constipation symptoms dramatically, but also received significant improvements in the patients’ quality of life.