west china medical publishers
Keyword
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Keyword "sphincter-preserving surgery" 2 results
  • Risk factors associated with the delay reversal ileostomy following sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer

    ObjectiveThis study aimed to discuss the risk factors associated with the delay reversal ileostomy following sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer.MethodsClinical data were collected retrospectively on 130 consecutive patients undergoing defunctioning ileostomy following sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer, between January 2014 and December 2014 in the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University. According to the reversal time of ileostomy, the patients were divided into two groups, including the delay reversal ileostomy group (≥120 d, n=72) and the normal ileostomy group (<120 d, n=58).ResultsOne hundred and thirty patients were studied (median time to reversal 132 d, range 39–692 d). Logistic regression model showed that adjuvant chemotherapy (OR=14.106, P=0.002), distance of tumor from the anal verge (OR=0.019, P=0.002), and anastomotic leakage (OR=32.440, P=0.001) were significant independent risk factors for delayed reversal. Time to reversal was significantly longer in those patients who had adjuvant chemotherapy, anastomotic leakage, and short distance of tumor from the anal verge.ConclusionAdjuvant chemotherapy, short distance of tumor from the anal verge, and anastomotic leakage are the independent risk factors for delay reversal ileostomy following sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer.

    Release date:2019-05-08 05:34 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Impact of preoperative nutritional status on postoperative complications in patients undergoing extreme sphincter-preserving surgery following neoadjuvant therapy: a study based on DACCA database

    ObjectiveTo understand the impact of preoperative nutritional status on the postoperative complications for patients with low/ultra-low rectal cancer undergoing extreme sphincter-preserving surgery following neoadjuvant therapy. MethodsThe patients with low/ultra-low rectal cancer who underwent extreme sphincter-preserving surgery following neoadjuvant therapy from January 2009 to December 2020 were retrospectively collected using the Database from Colorectal Cancer (DACCA), and then who were assigned into a nutritional risk group (the score was low than 3 by the Nutrition Risk Screening 2002) and non-nutritional risk group (the score was 3 or more by the Nutrition Risk Screening 2002). The postoperative complications and survival were analyzed for the patients with or without nutritional risk. The postoperative complications were defined as early-term (complications occurring within 30 d after surgery), middle-term (complications occurring during 30–180 d after surgery), and long-term (complications occurring at 180 d and more after surgery). The survival indicators included overall survival and disease-specific survival. ResultsA total of 680 patients who met the inclusion criteria for this study were retrieved from the DACCA database. Among them, there were 500 (73.5%) patients without nutritional risk and 180 (26.5%) patients with nutritional risk. The postoperative follow-up time was 0–152 months (with average 48.9 months). Five hundreds and forty-three survived, including 471 (86.7%) patients with free-tumors survival and 72 (13.3%) patients with tumors survival. There were 137 deaths, including 122 (89.1%) patients with cancer related deaths and 15 (10.9%) patients with non-cancer related deaths. There were 48 (7.1%) cases of early-term postoperative complications, 51 (7.5%) cases of middle-term complications, and 17 (2.5%) cases of long-term complications. There were no statistical differences in the incidence of overall complications between the patients with and without nutritional risk (χ2=3.749, P=0.053; χ2=2.205, P=0.138; χ2=310, P=0.578). The specific complications at different stages after surgery (excluding the anastomotic leakage complications in the patients with nutritional risk was higher in patients without nutritional risk, P=0.034) had no statistical differences between the two groups (P>0.05). The survival curves (overall survival and disease-specific survival) using the Kaplan-Meier method had no statistical differences between the patients with and without nutritional risk (χ2=3.316, P=0.069; χ2=3.712, P=0.054). ConclusionsFrom the analysis results of this study, for the rectal cancer patients who underwent extreme sphincter-preserving surgery following neoadjuvant therapy, the patients with preoperative nutritional risk are more prone to anastomotic leakage within 30 d after surgery. Although other postoperative complications and long-term survival outcomes have no statistical differences between patients with and without nutritional risk, preoperative nutritional management for them cannot be ignored.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
1 pages Previous 1 Next

Format

Content