ObjectiveTo assess the reliability, effectiveness, and the safety of full endoscopic transforaminal decompression (FETD) under local anesthesia guided by the classification of lateral region of the lumbar spinal canal (CLLSC) in treating lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) in geriatric patients.MethodsThe clinical data of 63 geriatric patients with LSS met the inclusion criteria underwent FETD surgery between June 2015 and July 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 37 males and 26 females, with a median age of 76 years [interquartile range (IQR), 73-80 years], and a median symptomatic duration of 55 months (IQR, 16-120 months). There were 17 cases of grade B and 46 cases of grade C based on the Schizas morphological grading system. CLLSC was used for imaging evaluation for the stenotic condition, and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) were used to test intra-observer and inter-observer reliability of CLLSC. The stenotic condition of patients was re-evaluated by the surgeon after operation, and the results were compared with the findings of preoperative CLLSC. The visual analogue scale (VAS) score for low back pain and leg pain recorded before operation, and at 1 day, 3 months, and 6 months after operation, and last follow-up were used to assess the pain relieving; the functional improvement was evaluate by Oswestry disability index (ODI); the modified Macnab criteria were used to self-evaluate the surgical satisfaction.ResultsThe operation were successfully performed for all patients, with a median operation time of 75 minutes (IQR, 65-85 minutes), postoperative hospitalization stay of 48 hours (IQR, 48-72 hours), and the time to ambulation after operation of 24 hours (IQR, 24-24 hours). Sixty-three patients were followed-up and with a median follow-up time of 18 months (IQR, 13-20 months). Based on preoperative CLLSC classification, there were 72 stenotic zones, distributed 16 in zone 1, 6 in zone 2, 3 in zone 3, 2 in zone 4, 7 in zone 5, 34 in zones 1+2, 2 in zones 3+4, and 2 in zones 4+5. Perioperative complications occurred in 4 cases (6.3%), including 2 cases of intraoperative dural sac tear, 1 of preoperative numbness symptom aggravation, and 1 of postoperative urinary retention. VAS score of leg pain and ODI score at each time point after operation were significantly improved compared with those before operation (P<0.05). VAS scores of low back pain showed no significant difference between pre- and post-operation (P>0.05). At last follow-up, based on the modified Macnab criteria, 19 cases were excellent, 37 were good, 6 were fair, and 1 was poor, and the excellent and good rate was 88.9%. The reliability analysis showed that CLLSC had substantial intra-observer reliability in the geriatric population, with an average ICC of 0.78. There was also a substantial inter-observer reliability, with an average ICC of 0.73. While comparing the preoperative CLLSC results with the postoperative CLLSC results, 53 patients (73.6%) were in full agreement, 15 patients (20.8%) were in partial agreement, and 4 patients (5.6%) were not.ConclusionCLLSC has high reliability in the diagnosis of LSS in the geriatric patients. Combined FETD with CLLSC, accurate diagnosis, and minimal invasion can be performed to achieve safe and effective result.
ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical feasibility of full-endoscopic decompression for the treatment of single-level cervical disc herniation via anterior transcorporeal approach.MethodsAccording to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 21 patients with cervical disc herniation who received full-endoscopic decompression via anterior transcorporeal approach between September 2014 and March 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 12 males and 9 females with an age ranged from 32 to 65 years, with an average of 48.5 years. The duration of symptoms ranged from 6 to 18 weeks, with an average of 10.5 weeks. According to the Nurick grading of spinal cord symptoms, there were 2 cases with grade 1, 7 cases with grade 2, and 12 cases with grade 3. Operative segment was C3, 4 in 2 cases, C4, 5 in 8 cases, C5, 6 in 9 cases, and C6, 7 in 2 cases. The operation time and related complications were recorded. The central vertical height of the vertebral body and the diseased segment space were measured on the cervical X-ray film. The neck and shoulder pain were evaluated by visual analogue scale (VAS) score; Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score was used to evaluate the improvement of neurological function in patients. The MRI of cervical spine was reexamined at 3 months after operation, and the CT of cervical spine was reexamined at 12 months after operation. The decompression of spinal cord and the healing of bone canal in the vertebral body were further evaluated.ResultsFull-endoscopic decompression via anterior transcorporeal approach were achieved at all 21 patients. The operation time was 85-135 minutes, with an average of 96.5 minutes. All patients were followed up 24-27 months, with an average of 24.5 months. There was no complication such as residual nucleus pulposus, spinal cord injury, large esophageal vessels injury, pleural effusion, endplate collapse, intraspinal hematoma, cervical spine instability, protrusion of disc in the same segment, or kyphosis. Both VAS scores of neck and shoulder pain and JOA scores were significantly improved at 12 months after operation (P<0.05). At 3 months after operation, it was confirmed by the cervical MRI that neural decompression was sufficient and the abnormal signal was also degraded in the patients with intramedullary high signal at T2-weighted image. The cervical CT showed that bone healing were achieved in the surgical vertebral bodies of all patients at 12 months after operation. At 24 months after operation, the central vertical height of the diseased segment space significantly decreased compared with preoperative one (t=2.043, P=0.035); but there was no significant difference in the central vertical height of the vertebral body between pre- and post-operation (t=0.881, P=0.421).ConclusionFull-endoscopic decompression via anterior transcorporeal approach, integrating the advantages of the endoscopic surgery and the transcorporeal approach, provide an ideal and thorough decompression of the ventral spinal cord with satisfactory clinical and radiographic results.
The current unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) technique was originated from Argentina and developed in South Korea, which was rapidly growing and popularizing in China. The adoption of spinal endoscopy, using small cameras placed inside body with continuous water irrigation, providing better surgical field with less tissue dissection and quicker recovery for patients. As with other disciplines, the use of spinal endoscopy in spinal surgery will become increasingly widespread. UBE technique will promote the popularization of spinal endoscopy in China with monoportal endoscopy technique. At the same time, biportal endoscopy has better expansibility, the application of accessory incision may provide solution for more complicated spinal disease. Chinese spine surgeon should better understand the trends in spinal endoscopy, seize the opportunity of the rapidly evolving in spinal healthcare, and to promote the popularization of UBE across the globe.
Lumbar spondylolisthesis is a common condition in spinal surgery, which is often characterized by lower back and leg pain and numbness. There are various treatment methods for this condition, and different treatment plans should be adopted according to different situations. Traditional open surgery methods are relatively traumatic and have longer recovery times, while minimally invasive spine techniques have advantages such as smaller incisions, less bleeding, higher fusion rates, and faster recovery. This review summarizes the relevant literature on the application of minimally invasive techniques in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis in recent years, analyzes and compares the advantages and disadvantages of different approaches and endoscopic techniques, as well as reduction, decompression, and fusion effects. The aim is to provide reference for surgeons in selecting surgical procedures for the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis.