Objective To evaluate the efficacy of the subtotal splenectomy versus total splenectomy with gastroesophageal devascularization for patients of hepatic cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Methods We searched the Cochrane Library (Issue 2, 2008), MEDLINE (1966 to August, 2008), EMbase (1966 to August, 2008), the China Biological Medicine Database (1978 to August, 2008), Chinese Sci-tech Periodical Full-text Database (1989 to August, 2008) and Chinese Periodical Full-text Database (1994 to August, 2008), as well as hand-searched several related journals and conference proceedings for the randomized controlled trials involving the comparison of the efficacy of the subtotal splenectomy with the total splenectomy for the patients of the hepatic cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Results Three studies involving 136 patients were identified. The results of two studies indicated that both of the subtotal splenectomy increased less the peripheral platelet count and there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups [WMD= – 39.27, 95%CI (– 62.57, – 15.97)]. Two studies indicated that the serum tuftsin level was increased significantly after the subtotal splenectomy [WMD= 165.28, 95%CI (159.36, 171.21)]. One study indicated that both of the subtotal splenectomy and total splenectomy with gastroesophageal devascularization increased the peripheral white blood cell count and there was statistical difference between the two groups [WMD= – 0.93, 95%CI (– 1.52, – 0.34)]. There was no statistical difference in serum IgA level between the two groups. One study indicated the average fever time after the total splenectomy was longer than the subtotal splenectomy; there was statistical differences in 5 years survival rate between the two groups (Plt;0.05). Conclusions After the subtotal splenectomy the hypersplenism of patients suffered from hepatic cirrhosis and portal hypertension was corrected obviously and the blood cells were increased smoothly so that high blood viscosity was prevented and occurrence of the thrombotic diseases was decreased. And the immune system reserve functions of the patients with hepatic cirrhosis and portal hypertension were maintained. More randomized controlled trials, with large sample sizes, may lead to more accurate results.
Objective To evaluate the effect of laparoscopic splenectomy （LS） and open splenectomy （OS） forhypersplenism secondary to liver cirrhosis with portal hypertension. Methods Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials， Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews， Medline， Embase， CINAHL， CBM， CNKI， VIP and WanFang database were searched for randomized control trials or retrospective studies related to the effect of LS and OS for hyper-splenism secondary to liver cirrhosis with portal hypertension. Then studies were screened according to the inclusion and exclusion criterias， data were collected， and quality of studies were evaluated. RevMan 5.1.0 software was used for meta-analysis. Results Seventeen retrospective studies and one randomized control trial were enrolled. The results of meta analysis showed that， the estimated blood loss， postoperative hospital stay， rate of postoperative complication， and WBC level on 1 day after operation of LS group were significantly lower or shorter than those of OS group （P＜0.05）. However， there were no significant differences on operative time， WBC level on 7 days after operation， postoperative platelets （1 day and 7 days after operation）， alanine aminotransferase （1 day and 7 days after operation）， and total bilirubin （1 day and 7 days after operation） between LS group and OS group （P＞0.05）. Conclusions LS may be more effective to reduce blood loss， postoperative hospital stay， and rate of postoperative complication in patients with hypersplenism secondary to liver cirrhosis with portal hypertension in comparison to OS. However， the effectiveness of LS on liver function is not clear.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the operative technique and clinical efficacy of laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) combined with esophagogastric devascularization in treatment of portal hypertension induced by liver cirrhosis. MethodsTwelve cases with esophageal and gastric varices induced by portal hypertension and liver cirrhosis were treated by the LS combined with esophagogastric devascularization in our department from March 2009 to August 2010, which clinical data were analyzed and summarized retrospectively. ResultsThe splenic artery was ligated before the treatment of splenic pedicle in 12 cases, LS combined with pericardial devascularization was successfully performed in 10 cases, 7 cases of which were treated by the level two transection method of splenic pedicle, and 2 cases were converted to open surgery due to intraoperative bleeding. In 10 cases, the operative time was 180-300 min (average 210 min), and intraoperative blood loss was 200-1 000 ml (average 480 ml). The postoperative hospital stay was 8-15 d (average 9 d)， the postoperative complications included plural effusion （lt;300 ml） in 2 cases， mild ascites （lt;300 ml） in 2 cases, and mild pancreatic leakage in 1 case， but all were cured eventually， and no mortality occurred. Followup was conducted in 12 patients for 4 to 20 months (average 7 months), and no rebleeding occurred. ConclusionsLS combined with pericardial devascularization is relatively safe and effective methods in treatment of portal hypertension induced by liver cirrhosis. The keys to success include ligation of splenic artery, and the use of harmonic scalpel combined with ligasure to treat splenic pedicle.
ObjectiveTo investigate the safety and feasibility of the treatment of laparoscopic splenectomy for patients with traumatic splenic rupture. MethodsBetween October 2006 and October 2009, 48 cases of traumatic splenic rupture underwent laparoscopic splenectomy were analyzed in this hospital. According to the differrent styles of splenic stalk, different operative methods were taken， including titanic clipping in 12 cases， titanic clipping combining silk suture ligation in 8 cases， snare combining titanic clipping in 10 cases， LigaSure in 8 cases， and EndoGIA in 8 cases. ResultsLaparoscopic splenectomy was successfully completed in 32 cases; Handassisted laparoscopic splenectomy was applied in 14 cases, and 2 cases were converted to laparotomy because of tight spleen adhesion with surrounding tissues and bleeding rupture of the short gastric vessels. The operation time was 120－170 min with an average 140 min; the estimated intraoperative amount of blood loss was 300－1 200 ml with an average 800 ml. No postoperative complication occurred such as gastric fistula, pancreatic fistula or hemorrhage. Conclusion According to the differrent styles of splenic stalk, individual operative method can improve mission success rate in the laparoscopic splenectomy in traumatic splenic rupture.
ObjectiveTo summarize the recent development of surgical treatment for portal hypertension with hypersplenism. MethodsThe related literatures on various operation treatment of hypertension with hypersplenism at home and abroad in recent years were collected and reviewed. ResultsThere are many operation treatment methods of hypertension with hypersplenism, includes the pericardial devascularization, subtotal splenectomy, partial splenic embolization, spleen radiofrequency ablation, splenic artery ligation, distal splenorenal shunt, and so on. The different operation methods each has its advantages and disadvantages, but there are a certain percentage of the incidence of complications. At the same time, due to the limited understanding of the function of the spleen in portal hypertension, the treatment of "resecting" or "reserving" spleen has always been the hot spot of the academic dispute. ConclusionFor what kind of operation method is the most suitable for the treatment of hypertension with hypersplenism is no fixed conclusion.
ObjectiveTo explore the security and advantages of laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (LSPDP) for occupancy lesions in pancreatic body and tail. MethodsA total of 97 patients with occupancy lesions in pancreatic body and tail who underwent laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy in our hospital from June 2010 to August 2014 were collected retrospectively, and were divided into LSPDP group (n=60) and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy (LDPS) group (n=37) according to the surgery, clinical effect was compared between the 2 groups. ResultsThe operations got well in all patients, no one died during perioperative period. The operation time was shorter in LSPDP group than that of LDPS group[(190.83±66.39) min vs. (224.46±83.23) min, P=0.030], but there was no significant difference between LSPDP group and LDPS group in the blood loss[45.35 mL vs. 54.92 mL], hospital stay[(8.38±4.06) d vs. (9.76±4.54) d], incidence of total postoperative complication[23.33% (14/60) vs. 13.51% (5/37)], and degree of postoperative complication (P>0.050). There were 86 patients were followed up for 3-54 months, with the median time of 18 months. For patients with tumor, no one suffered from recurrence, metastasis, and death during the follow-up period, and other patients with benign diseases had an excellent prognosis. ConclusionFor occupancy lesions in pancreatic body and tail, LSPDP is feasible and safe.
Objective To summarize the effect of the splenectomy in patients with portal hypertension on the occurrence and recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma. Methods The related literatures about the splenectomy in patients with hepatocirrhosis combined with portal hypertension or patients with hepatocellular carcinoma combined with portal hypertension in recent years were reviewed. Results At present, most academics considered that, for patients with hepatocirrhosis combined with portal hypertension, splenectomy could reduce the occurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma. For patients with hepatocellular carcinoma combined with portal hypertension, splenectomy+hepatectomy didn’t increase the perioperative mortality, and it could reduce the recurrence rate of hepatocellular carcinoma. Conclusion Splenectomy for patients with portal hypertension is safe, and it can inhibit the occurrence and progress of hepatocellular carcinoma, however, the specific mechanism remain needs further study.
Objective To investigate safety, feasibility, and future direction of laparoscopic splenectomy. Method The latest progress and new achievements of laparoscopic splenectomy in the world were analyzed and summarized. Results At present, the laparoscopic splenectomy mainly included the completely laparoscopic splenectomy, hand assisted laparoscopic splenectomy, gasless laparoscopic splenectomy, single hole laparoscopic splenectomy, or robot assisted laparoscopic splenectomy. The completely laparoscopic total splenectomy had become the most common surgical procedure in the clinical treatment due to the reliable curative effect, less injury, and rapid recovery, the partial splenectomy was one of the precise treatments for the benign splenic lesions. The hand assisted laparoscopic splenectomy was widely used in the giant spleen, it could reduce the exposure difficulty, effectively deal with the intraoperative hemorrhage, and reduce the risk of surgery. The robot assisted laparoscopic splenectomy was one of the minimally invasive operations, the system with three-dimensional high definition vision and flexible robotic arm overcame the limitations of traditional laparoscopic two-dimensional display, could precisely complete the operation and achieve the accurate treatment. Conclusions Laparoscopic splenectomy has some advantages of less operative injury, less pain, and rapid recovery, it’s safety and feasibility have been proved. We should strictly grasp indications and contraindications for laparoscopic splenectomy, appropriate surgical methods should be selected for specific splenic diseases to achieve the best curative effect. Remote control and precision operation will be a direction of development in future.
Objective To summarize the experience of single center for radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) in the treatment of pancreatic body and tail cancer. Methods The clinical data of 52 patients with pancreatic body and tail cancer who underwent RAMPS surgery in the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University from January 2013 to December 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Results All operations of the 52 patients were successfully completed, with no death during hospitalization and 30 days after surgery. The operative time was (463±137) min (198–830 min), the median of intraoperative blood loss was 400 mL (100–2 800 mL), of which 19 cases (36.5%) received intraoperative blood transfusion. The median of hospital stay was 19.5 days (7–58 days). After operation, 18 patients suffered from pancreatic fistula, 5 patients suffered from delay gastric emptying, 7 patients suffered from peritoneal effusion, 3 patients suffered from pleural effusion, 4 patients suffered from abdominal infection, 2 patients suffered from abdominal bleeding. Reoperations were performed in 2 patients. There were 51 patients were followed up for 3–35 months (the median of 18 months) with the median survival time were 16.2 months. During the follow-up period, 21 patients suffered from recurrence or metastasis, of which 8 patients died. The results of Cox partial hazard model showed that, surgical margin ［RR=3.65, 95% CI was (0.06, 5.11), P=0.026］ and adjuvant therapy ［RR=6.43, 95% CI was (1.51, 27.43), P=0.012］ were statistically related with prognosis, the prognosis of patients with negative surgical margin and underwent adjuvant therapy were better than those patients with positive surgical margin and didn’t underwent adjuvant therapy. Conclusions RAMPS is safe and feasible in the treatment of pancreatic body and tail cancer, and it may improve the R0 resection rate. RAMPS combins with adjuvant therapy can contribute to better prognosis.
Objective To explore the risk factors of postoperative portal vein system thrombus (PVST) after laparoscopic splenectomy in treatment of portal hypertension and hypersplenism. Methods Clinical data of 76 patients with portal hypertension and hypersplenism who underwent laparoscopic splenectomy in the Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital from January 2012 to January 2017 were analyzed. Results There were 31 patients suffered from PVST (PVST group), and other 45 patients enrolled in non-PVST group.There were significant differences on age, diameter of splenic vein, diameter of portal vein, blood flow velocity of portal vein, level of D-dimer, and platelet count between the PVST group and the non-PVST group (P<0.05), but there were no significant difference on gender, Child-Pugh classification, etiology of cirrhosis, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative complications, and prothrombin time between the two groups (P>0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that, patients with age >50 years (RR=1.31, P=0.02), splenic vein diameter >12 mm ( RR=1.29, P<0.01), portal vein diameter >13 mm (RR=1.55, P=0.01), blood flow velocity of portal vein <18 cm/s ( RR=1.47, P<0.01), increases level of D-dimer (RR=2.89, P=0.03), and elevated platelet count (RR=1.82 P=0.02) had higher risk of postoperative PVST than those patients with age ≤50 years, splenic vein diameter ≤12 mm, portal vein diameter ≤13 mm, blood flow velocity of portal vein ≥18 cm/s, normal level of D-dimer and platelet count. Conclusion For patients with portal hypertension and hypersplenism who underwent laparoscopic splenectomy, we should pay more attention to the risk factor, such as D-dimer and so on, to avoid the occurrence of postoperative PVST.