Objective To explore the timing and safety of limited-period lung cancer surgery in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Methods Clinical data of of patients infected with COVID-19 undergoing lung cancer surgery (an observation group) in the Department of Thoracic Surgery of Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, the Department of Thoracic Surgery of General Hospital of Southern Theater Command of PLA, and the Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery of the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University from December 2022 to January 2023 were retrospectively analyzed and compared with patients who underwent surgery during the same period but were not infected with COVID-19 (a control group), to explore the impact of COVID-19 infection on lung cancer surgery. Results We finally included 110 patients with 73 patients in the observation group (28 males and 45 females at age of 52.62±12.80 years) and 37 patients in the control group (22 males and 15 females at age of 56.84±11.14 years). The average operation time of the observation group was longer than that of the control group, and the incidence of anhelation was higher than that of the control group (P<0.05). There were no statistcal differences in blood loss, length of hospital stay, moderate or above fever rate, degree of cough and chest pain, or blood routine between the two groups. ConclusionIt is safe and feasible to perform lung cancer surgery early after recovery for COVID-19 patients with lung cancer.
Recently, an editorial in Cell Research illuminated the concept of the curative time window for lung adenocarcinoma. Within this window, patients could achieve 100.0% 5-year or 10-year post-operative recurrence-free survival. Adenocarcinoma in situ and minimally invasive adenocarcinoma in pathology, as well as pure ground-glass opacity in radiology could be regarded as the curative time window. However, not all the patients can catch this time window. A precise understanding of this concept helps elevate the curative rate for lung cancer patients and mitigate the risks of overdiagnosis and overtreatment. This article delves into the accurate comprehension of the surgical curative time window for lung adenocarcinoma, proposed a clinical strategy for early-stage lung adenocarcinoma, and introduced clinical procedures comprising of this time window. It offers fresh insights into the timing of surgical interventions for lung adenocarcinoma.
ObjectiveTo explore the optimal surgical timing of sequential laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) following percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) in the patients with acute cholecystitis, so as to provide a clinical reference. MethodsThe patients who underwent PC and then sequential LC in the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University from March 2021 to July 2023 were selected based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, who were categorized into 3 groups: the short interval group (3–4 weeks), the intermediate interval group (5–8 weeks), and the long interval group (>8 weeks) based on the time interval between the PC and LC. The gallbladder wall thickness before LC, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospitalization time, total hospitalization time, time and cases of drainage tube placement, admission to intensive care unit, conversion to open surgery, occurrence of complications, and total hospitalization costs were compared among the 3 groups. ResultsA total of 99 patients were enrolled, including 25 in the short interval group, 41 in the intermediate interval group, and 33 in the long interval group. The data of patients among the 3 groups including demographic characteristics, blood routine, C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, fibrinogen, international standardized ratio, liver function indicators, and comorbidities had no statistical differences (P>0.05). The gallbladder wall thickness before LC and the operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospitalization time, total hospitalization time, time and cases of drainage tube placement, admission to intensive care unit, conversion to open surgery, occurrence of complications, and total hospitalization costs during and after LC had statistical differences among the 3 groups (P<0.05). These indicators of the intermediate interval group were better than those of the other two groups by the multiple comparisons (P<0.05), but which had no statistical differences except total hospitalization costs (P=0.019) between the short interval group and the long interval group (P>0.05). ConclusionAccording to the results of this study, the optimal surgical timing of sequential LC following PC is 5–8 weeks, however, which needs to be further validated by large sample size and multicenter data.
Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) represents a severe complication of infective endocarditis (IE) and stands as a significant contributor to the poor prognosis associated with IE. Current guidelines suggested a delay of 4 weeks for cardiac surgery in patients with ICH, but these recommendations were based on insufficient clinical evidence, and recent studies have yielded different opinions. In this paper, we thoroughly reviewed relevant guidelines and their references in conjunction with 3 typical cases with IE and ICH, discussed the recommendations with controversy, and proposed a process for the management of IE with ICH.