ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of the combined tenodesis for proximal lesions of biceps tendon with massive rotator cuff tear by arthroscopy. MethodsBetween January 2011 and June 2013, 48 patients with massive rotator cuff tear and proximal lesions of biceps tendon underwent combined tenodesis under arthroscopy, and the clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. Of 48 cases, 22 were male and 26 were female with an average age of 46 years (range, 35-59 years); 12 cases had clear history of trauma. The disease duration ranged from 1 to 57 months (mean, 4.6 months). All cases suffered from moderate to severe shoulder pain, the strength and the range of motion (ROM) declined when compared with those of the other side. According to Goutallier classification standard, 3 cases were rated as grade 0, 18 cases as grade 1, and 27 cases as grade 2. The operation time and complication were recorded. The visual analogue scale (VAS) score, ROM, the strength of flexed elevation and elbow flexion, Constant-Murley score, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS) were used to evaluate the effectiveness. ResultsThe operations were performed successfully, and incisions healed primarily. The operation time was 120-160 minutes (mean, 135 minutes). One case had shoulder joint swelling with wound bleeding, which was cured after proper treatment. All 48 patients were followed up 12-18 months (mean, 13.9 months). The results of MRI showed good healing of tendon at 6 months after operation. When compared with preoperative values, VAS score was significantly decreased (P<0.05); the ROM in forward flexion, external rotation, and internal rotation, and the strength of flexed elevation were significantly increased (P<0.05); and ASES score, Constant-Murley score, and UCLA score were significantly improved at 12 months after operation (P<0.05). No significant difference was observed in MEPS score and elbow flexion strength (P>0.05). ConclusionThe technique of combined tenodesis under arthroscopy can obtain satisfactory clinical outcomes in treating proximal lesions of biceps tendon with massive rotator cuff tear.
ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness of arthroscopic intertubercular groove and open subpectoral tenodesis in treatment of long head of biceps tendon (LHBT) tendinopathy.MethodsA clinical data of 80 patients with LHBT tendinopathy who were admitted between June 2013 and May 2017 and met the selection criteria was retrospectively analyzed. After cutting LHBT under arthroscopy, the arthroscopic intertubercular groove tenodesis was performed in 40 cases (group A) and open subpectoral tenodesis was performed in 40 cases (group B). There was no significant difference in the gender, age, side of the affected shoulder joint, disease duration, and preoperative pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Constant score, American Society of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery (ASES) score, Disability of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, LHBT score (LHBS) between the two groups (P>0.05). The operation time and the scores of shoulder joint pain and function at 12 months after operation were compared between the two groups.ResultsThe operation time was (3.6±2.5) minutes in group A and (8.5±2.3) minutes in group B, showing a significant difference (t=18.584, P=0.000). The incisions of the two groups healed by first intention, and there was no complication such as infection or thrombosis. All patients were followed up. The follow-up time was 24-30 months (mean, 26.0 months) in group A and 24-31 months (mean, 26.0 months) in group B. Both Speed test and Yergason test were negative at 3 months after operation. MRI showed that there was no obvious effusion around the LHTB and no dislocation of LHTB. At 12 months after operation, the VAS score, Constant score, ASES score, DASH score, and LHBS score of the two groups all improved when compared with preoperative ones (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in the differences before and after operation between the two groups (P>0.05). No Popeye sign appeared during the follow-up.ConclusionThe arthroscopic intertubercular groove and open subpectoral tenodesis can effectively relieve shoulder pain and improve function, but the former has shorter operation time and less trauma.
Objective To compare the effectiveness of the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) with or without proximal amputation after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in the treatment of repairable rotator cuff tear with LHBT injury. Methods The clinical data of 68 patients with LHBT injury combined with supraspinatus tendon tear who met the selection criteria between January 2016 and June 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. According to whether the proximal end of LHBT was cut off or not after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, they were divided into LHBT fixation without cutting group (group A, 32 cases) and LHBT fixation with cutting group (group B, 36 cases). There was no significant difference in gender, age, operating side, preoperative supraspinatus tear width, Constant-Murley shoulder function scale, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) score, and visual analogue scale (VAS) score between the two groups (P>0.05). The operation time, elbow flexion muscle strength, and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. The Constant-Murley shoulder function scale, UCLA score, and VAS score were used to evaluate the recovery of shoulder function before operation and at 3, 6, 12 months after operation. The acromion-humeral distance (AHD) was measured by Y-view X-ray film of the shoulder joint immediately after operation and at last follow-up. AHD and acromion-greater tubercle distance (AGT) were measured by musculoskeletal ultrasound at 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of abduction. Results There was no significant difference in operation time between the two groups (t=–0.740, P=0.463). Patients in both groups were followed up (13.0±0.7) months in group A and (13.1±0.8) months in group B, with no significant difference (t=0.127, P=0.899). At last follow-up, the elbow flexor muscle strength of the two groups reached grade Ⅴ. Complications (including shoulder pain, deltoid atrophy, and rotator cuff re-tear) occurred in 6 patients (18.75%) in group A and 9 patients (25.00%) in group B, without neurovascular injury, surgical site infection, joint stiffness, LHBT spasmodic pain, and Popeye deformity. There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups (χ2=0.385, P=0.535). The Constant-Murley shoulder function scale, UCLA score, and VAS score significantly improved in both groups at 3, 6, and 12 months after operation (P>0.05). The above scores in group B were significantly better than those in group A at 3 and 6 months after operation (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference between the two groups at 12 months after operation (P>0.05). Y-view X-ray film measurement of the shoulder joint showed that the AHD of the two groups at last follow-up was less than that at immediate after operation, but the difference was not significant (Z=−1.247, P=0.212); the AHD of group A was significantly greater than that of group B at last follow-up (t=−2.291, P=0.025). During musculoskeletal ultrasound detection of abduction and shoulder lift, there was no significant difference in the reduction degree of AHD and AGT in group A with abduction of 0°-30° compared with group B (P>0.05). The reduction degree of AHD and AGT in group A with abduction of 30°-60°, and the reduction degree of AGT in group A with abduction of 60°-90° were significantly smaller than those in group B (P<0.05). Conclusion In arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, whether the proximal structure of LHBT is cut off or not after LHBT fixation can effectively improve the symptoms of patients and promote the recovery of shoulder joint function. Compared with preserving the proximal structure of LHBT, cutting the proximal structure of LHBT after LHBT fixation has more obvious pain relief within 6 months, and the latter had better stability above the shoulder joint.