Objective To retrospectively review our experience of correction of type Ⅰa endoleak after thoracic endovascular aortic repair(TEVAR). Methods From August 2009 to May 2016, 29 patients with type Ⅰa endoleak after TEVAR (25 males, 4 females at mean age of 56±10 years (range, 41–86 years) underwent treatment: open surgery in 15 patients (an open surgery group), hybrid aortic arch repair in 6 patients (a hybrid group) and cuff extension in 8 patients(a cuff group). A history of hypertension was noted in 25 patients, diabetes mellitus in 3 patients, coronary artery disease in 3 patients, lung infection in one patient, aortic root aneurysm in one patient and aberrant right subclavian artery in one patient. Results In the open surgery group, no death was observed. Continuous renal replacement therapy and re-intubation was done in one patient and drainage of pericardial effusion in one patient. No death was noted in the hybrid group and persistent type Ⅰa endoleak in one patient. In the cuff group, thrombosis of the left common artery was noted in one patient and bypass of the left axillary artery to the left axillary artery and the left common carotid artery was done. Unfortunately, he died of cerebral infarction and total in-hospital death rate was 3.4% (1/29). Bypass of the left axillary artery to the left axillary artery was done in one patient with left upper limb ischemia. There were 4 (14.2%) deaths during follow-up: 3 deaths in the open surgical group and one death in the cuff group. Endoleak was observed in one patient in the hybrid group and one in the cuff group. Conclusion The corresponding procedure, including open surgery, hybrid aortic arch repair or cuff extension, is scheduled to be done according to the characteristics of type Ⅰa endoleak. Satisfactory outcomes are achieved in patients with typeⅠa endoleak.
ObjectiveTo summarize the surgical treatment plan and experience of patients with Marfan syndrome complicated with Stanford type B aortic dissection, and to explore the treatment strategy selection.MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 27 patients with Marfan syndrome complicated with thoracoabdominal aortic diseases who were treated in the department of cardiovascular surgery of our hospital from January 2013 to June 2019, including 13 males and 14 females, with an average age of 32.2±8.6 years. According to the patients' conditions, 19 of them received single pump-assisted blood transfusion combined with total thoracoabdominal aortic replacement (TAAAR), and 8 received thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in critically ill and pregnant patients. The patients were followed up in the outpatient clinic, and the thoracoabdominal aortic CT angiography was reexamined at 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and annually. The outcome of surgery, the incidence of intermediate cardiovascular adverse events, defined as the reoperation due to aortic or cardiac diseases, and intermediate survival rate were studied.ResultsAll 27 patients successfully completed the operation, the operation time was 60-852 (395.10±222.60) min, the spinal cord ischemia time was 14-26 (19.33±3.44) min, and the abdominal viscera ischemia time was 16-23 (19.83±1.94) min. Eight patients of TEVAR were all operated in acute phase and 19 patients of TAAAR in chronic phase. Two early postoperative deaths occurred in TEVAR patients. One died of puerperal infection and multiple organ dysfunction after cesarean section at the same time. After TEVAR, type A dissection re-ocurred in one patient. The family member gave up the treatment, and the patient died of the dissection ruptured after cesarean section. During the average follow-up of 47.6±36.7 months, 1 patient died of cerebrovascular accident and 9 patients were reoperated for adverse cardiovascular events, including 4 in TEVAR and 5 in TAAAR.ConclusionTAAAR is the first choice for the treatment of Marfan syndrome combined with thoracoabdominal aortic diseases. TEVAR is easy to operate, with a low incidence of early mortality and complications, but has the risk of internal leakage and avulsion, and a high reoperation rate in the middle stage, so it can be used for high-risk elderly patients not suitable for open surgery, or as a bridge therapy for emergency patients before open surgery.
ObjectiveTo report our clinical experience and outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for acute Stanford type A dissection using ascending aorta replacement combined with implantation of a fenestrated stent-graft of the entire aortic arch through a minimally invasive technique. MethodsFrom 2016 to 2020 in our hospital, 24 patients (17 males and 7 females, aged 45-72 years) with complicated Stanford type A aortic dissection, underwent replacement of the proximal ascending aorta with TEVAR. None of the patients with dissection involved the three branches of the superior arch, and all patients were replaced with artificial blood vessels of the ascending aorta under non-hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass, preserving the arch and the three branches above the arch, and individualized stent graft fenestration. ResultsSurgical technical success rate was 100.0%. There was no intraoperative complication or evidence of endo-leak in 1 month postoperatively. Hospital stay was 10±5 d. During postoperative follow-up, the stent was unobstructed without displacement, the preserved branch of the aortic arch was unobstructed, and the true lumen of the descending aorta was enlarged. Conclusion This hybrid technique by using TEVAR with fenestrated treatment is a minimally invasive and effective method to treat high-risk patients with acute Stanford type A aortic dissection.
In recent years, the diagnosis and management technology of type B aortic dissection (TBAD) has developed rapidly worldwide along with evidence-based medicine practice and clinical research data. But the standard clinical criteria are still limited. Based on this, the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) and the American Association for Thoracic Surgery (AATS) established an expert group dominated by aortic surgeons to collate and analyze the comprehensive literature data of acute and chronic, complicated and uncomplicated TBAD. And then, the group formulated and officially released the clinical practice guidelines for TBAD in 2022. In this paper, we interpreted and analyzed the main contents of the guideline in combination with domestic research, in order to provide reference and help for the clinical diagnosis and treatment of TBAD at the present stage in China.
Objective To analyze the clinical effect of hybrid surgery on complex type B aortic dissection in 5 years. Methods A retrospective analysis of 47 patients with complex type B aortic dissection in the Central Hospital of Wuhan affiliated to Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology from 2014 to 2017 was conducted, including 42 males and 5 females with an average age of 54.9±11.2 years. Twenty-one patients underwent the left common carotid artery to the left subclavian artery bypass (a bypass group), and 26 patients underwent the left common carotid artery to the left subclavian artery transposition (a transposition group). Results All patients accepted hybrid surgery successfully. There was no statistical difference in arterial occlusion time or intraoperative blood loss between the two groups (P＞0.05). The 5-year follow-up rate was 100.0% (47/47). During the follow-up period, 12 (25.5%) patients developed complications, including 5 (10.6%) patients of endoleak, 5 (10.6%) patients of hoarseness, 2 (4.3%) patients of stroke/dizziness. There was no patient of left upper limb weakness, paraplegia or retrograde aotic dissection. The reconstructed left subclavian artery remained patent in 46 (97.9%) patients. The overall 5-year survival rate was 100.0%. Conclusion The long-term therapeutic outcome of hybrid surgery for the treatment of complex type B aortic dissection is satisfying. In 5 years, the rebuilt left subclavian artery has a remarkable patency rate. Endoleak and hoarseness are the most common surgical complications.
ObjectiveTo explore the efficacy of using a single branch stent-graft to treat primary intramural hematoma located at the distal arch or descending aorta in Stanford A type aortic intramural hematoma. MethodsFrom July 2020 to November 2022, 10 patients with primary intramural hematoma of Stanford A type aortic intramural hematoma were treated with endovascular repair using a single branch stent-graft in the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery at The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital. There were 9 males and 1 female, aged from 32 to 66 years, with a mean age of (47±10.4) years. All patients had intramural hematoma involving the ascending aorta and aortic arch, diagnosed as type A intramural hematoma, with the tear located in the descending aorta. Among them, 6 patients were complicated by ulceration of the descending aorta with intramural hematoma, and 4 patients had changes of the descending aortic dissection. All patients underwent endovascular stent repair, with 8 patients undergoing emergency surgery (≤14 days) and 2 patients undergoing subacute surgery (15 days to 3 months). Results There were no neurological complications, paraplegia, stent fracture or displacement, or limb or visceral ischemia during the perioperative period in all patients. One patient had continuous chest pain after surgery, and the stent had a new tear at the proximal end, requiring ascending aorta and partial arch replacement. As of the latest follow-up, all patients had obvious absorption or complete absorption of the intramural hematoma in the ascending aorta and aortic arch compared with before the operation. ConclusionSingle branch stent-graft treatment of retrograde ascending aortic intramural hematoma is safe and effective, with good short-term results.
Objective To explore the effectiveness and predictive value of computer simulated thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Methods The clinical data of the patients with Stanford type B aortic dissection who underwent TEVAR from February 2019 to February 2022 in our hospital was collected. According to whether there was residual false cavity around the stent about 1 week after TEVAR, the patients were divided into a false cavity closure group and a false cavity residual group. Based on computer simulation, personalized design and three-dimensional construction of the stent framework and covering were carried out. After the stent framework and membrane were assembled, they were pressed and placed into the reconstructed aortic dissection model. TEVAR computer simulation was performed, and the simulation results were analyzed for hemodynamics to obtain the maximum blood flow velocity and maximum wall shear stress at the false lumen outlet level at the peak systolic velocity of the ventricle, which were compared with the real hemodynamic data of the patient after TEVAR surgery. The impact of hemodynamics on the residual false lumen around the stent in the near future based on computer simulation of hemodynamic data after TEVAR surgery was further explored. Results Finally a total of 28 patients were collected, including 24 males and 4 females aged 53.390±11.020 years. There were 18 patients in the false cavity closure group, and 10 patients in the false cavity residual group. The error rate of shear stress of the distal decompression port of the false cavity after computer simulation TEVAR was 6%-25%, and the error rate of blood flow velocity was 3%-31%. There was no statistical difference in age, proportion of male, history of hypertension, history of diabetes, smoking history, prothrombin time or activated partial thromboplatin time at admission between the two groups (all P>0.05). The blood flow velocity and shear stress after TEVAR were statistically significant (all P<0.05). The maximum shear stress (OR=1.823, P=0.010) of the false cavity at the level of the distal decompression port after simulated TEVAR was an independent risk factor for the residual false cavity around the stent. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the area under the curve corresponding to the maximum shear stress of false cavity at the level of distal decompression port after simulated TEVAR was 0.872, the best cross-sectional value was 8.469 Pa, and the sensitivity and specificity were 90.0% and 83.3%, respectively. Conclusion Computers can effectively simulate TEVAR and perform hemodynamic analysis before and after TEVAR surgery through simulation. Maximum shear stress at the decompression port of the distal end of the false cavity is an independent risk factor for the residual false cavity around the stent. When it is greater than 8.469 Pa, the probability of residual false cavity around the stent increases greatly.
ObjectiveTo explore the short- and mid-term efficacy of Castor single branch aortic stent combined with subclavian artery bypass grafting for the aortic arch lesions. MethodsA retrospective analysis of the clinical data of patients with proximal anchor zone insufficiency aortic arch lesions treated with Castor stent combined with carotid-subclavian bypass at the Department of Cardiac Surgery, Drum Tower Hospital, the Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School from August 2020 to November 2023 was performed. ResultsA total of 22 patients were included, including 19 males and 3 females, with an average age of 56±16 years. There were 18 patients of aortic dissection and 4 patients of aortic arch tumors. The success rate of surgical technique was 100.0%, and the average postoperative hospital stay for patients was 10±4 days. The median follow-up time was 20 months. During the follow-up period, there were no major complications such as endoleak, paraplegia, cerebral infarction, renal insufficiency, etc., and all patients had no readmissions. ConclusionFor proximal anchor zone insufficiency aortic arch lesions, the treatment method of using a Castor stent branch placed in the left common carotid artery can effectively extend the anchor zone, avoid the huge trauma of open chest surgery, and achieve good short- and mid-term efficacy.
ObjectiveTo investigate the impact of anatomical variations of the isolated left vertebral artery (ILVA) on clinical outcomes and imaging outcomes in patients with Stanford type B aortic dissection (TBAD) who underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair. MethodsThe clinical data of patients with TBAD in West China Hospital, Sichuan University from January 2016 to December 2023 were collected, and the differences of clinical outcomes and imaging outcomes between patients with and without ILVA were compared. ResultsBased on the inclusion criteria and the result of propensity score-based matching, 82 patients with TBAD were included, including 17 patients with ILVA (ILVA group) and 65 patients without ILVA (control group). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of the radiological and surgical information (P>0.05). The median time of the follow-up for these 82 patients were 37 months, during which there were no significant differences in aortic-related death, aortic event, stroke, adverse aortic remodeling, type Ⅰ A endoleak, and retrograde progression between the two groups (P>0.05). Compared with the control group, the re-intervention rate [HR=2.56, 95%CI (1.55, 8.11), P=0.03] and the incidence of type Ⅱ internal leakage [OR=1.36, 95%CI (1.08, 2.11), P=0.04] in the ILVA group were higher. ConclusionsNo significant differences were observed for ILVA patients in terms of serious adverse events such as aortic-related death and retrograde progression, comparing with the patients with normal aortic arch. However, the patients with ILVA were more susceptible to complications such as reintervention and type Ⅱ endoleak, which warranted the necessity of intensive postoperative follow-up for these patients.
Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of ascending aorta banding technique combined with typeⅠhybrid aortic arch repair for the aortic arch diseases. Methods The clinical data of patients undergoing ascending aorta banding technique combined with type Ⅰ hybrid arch repair for aortic arch diseases from March 2019 to March 2022 in Beijing Anzhen Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. The technical success, perioperative complications and follow-up results were evaluated. Results A total of 44 patients were collected, including 35 males and 9 females, with a median age of 63.0 (57.5, 64.6) years. The average EuroSCORE Ⅱ score was 8.4%±0.7%. The technical success rate was 100.0%. All patients did not have retrograde type A aortic dissection and endoleaks. One patient died of multiple organ failure 5 days after operation, the in-hospital mortality rate was 2.3%, and the remaining 43 patients survived and were discharged from hospital. The median follow-up period was 14.5 (6-42) months with a follow-up rate of 100.0%. One patient with spinal cord injury died 2 years after hospital discharge. One patient underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair at postoperative 3 months due to new entry tears near to the distal end of the stent. Conclusion Ascending aorta banding combined with typeⅠhybrid arch repair for the aortic arch diseases does not need cardio-pulmonary bypass. Ascending aorta banding technique strengthens the proximal anchoring area of the stent to avoid risks such as retrograde type A dissection, endoleak and migration. The operation owns small trauma, rapid recovery, low mortality and a low rate of reintervention, which may be considered as a safe and effective choice in the treatment of the elderly, high-risk patients with complex complications.