Objective To discuss the application value in increasing the frequency of monitoring and ensuring the safety of anticoagulation therapy in patient self-monitoring (PST) and self-management (PSM) of portable coagulometer. Method This non-randomized prospective controlled study was conducted in 100 patients receiving oral warfarin anticoagulation therapy after heart valve replacement and met the inclusion criteria in our hospital between March 2013 and April 2014 year. All the patients were divided into three groups including an outpatient follow-up group(outpatient group), a self-monitoring group and a self-management group. Meanwhile, the patients in the outpatient group visited professional institutions, performed international normalized ratio (INR) testing with central lab and adjusted the dosage of orally administered warfarin by the doctors. And the other two groups performed INR testing with CoaguChek XS portable coagulometer by themselves, and the patients in the self-management group performed management by themselves. The follow-up time was 6 months. The dates of time in therapeutic range (TTR), fraction of time in therapeutic range (FTTR) and anticoagulation complications in the three groups were analyzed and compared. Results There was no significant difference in the INR results obtained from the follow-up time among the three groups (P=0.845) . TTR value of INR of the outpatient group, the self-monitoring group, and the self-management group was 45.9% (4368.0 days/9517.0 days), 61.2% (6057.0 days/9897.0 days), and 65.4% (2833.8 days/4333.0 days), respectively with a statistical difference among the three groups (P<0.001) . FTTR value of INR obtained from the outpatient group, the self-monitoring group, and the self-management group was 48.3% (99 times/205 times), 60.7% (164 times/270 times), and 64.9% (100 times/154 times) respectively. There was a statistical difference in the FTTR between the outpatient group and the self-monitoring group (P=0.007) , and also between the outpatient group and the self-monitoring group (P=0.002) . But there was no statistical difference between the self-monitoring group and the self-management group (P=0.392) . There were not any major bleeding and thrombosis complications in all study. And there was no statistical difference in the total complications, thrombosis, and bleeding complications rates between the outpatient group and the self-monitoring group, and also between the outpatient group and the self-management group (P>0.05) . Conclusions The patients receiving oral anticoagulation after heart valve replacement or their care providers were able to perform PST and PSM. The use of portable coagulometer for self-monitoring and self-management can increase the frequency of anticoagulation monitoring and achieve better INR target value control. PST and PSM could achieve higher quality of anticoagulation management and life and without increasing the risk of oral anticoagulation than the traditional monitoring method. The monitoring frequency of once a month is reasonable for the patients receiving oral anticoagulation more than half a year after heart valve replacement.
Objective To evaluate the quality of anticoagulant therapy in patients with mechanical prosthetic valve replacement during early period through time in therapeutic range(TTR) and fraction of time in therapeutic range(FTTR), and to provide an objective evidence for further improving quality of anticoagulant therapy. Methods All the patients were followed and registered in hospital and at outpatient clinic from July 2012 through April 2014, with a maximum of 6 months after surgery. Targeted international normalized rate (INR) was 1.60 to 2.20, acceptable INR was 1.50 to 2.30. And warfarin weekly dosage adjustment was used as the strategy of anticoagulation management. Adjusting the warfarin dosage when INR was beyond acceptable INR. Events of bleeding, thrombogenesis and thromboembolism, TTR and FTTR of these patients during the follow-up were collected to evaluate quality of anticoagulant therapy in these patients. Results A total 477 patients and 2 755 reports of INR values were included for data analysis. The follow-up time was 78 918 days. Values of INR varied from 0.92 to 7.72(1.83±0.64). Required weekly doses of warfarin in target INR and acceptable INR were 5.00–35.00(18.15±3.99) mg/week and 5.00–39.38(18.29±4.08) mg/week. TTR of target INR and acceptable INR was 36.85%(27 079.5 d/78 918.0 d) and 49.84% (39 331.5 d/78 918.0 d), respectively. FTTR of target INR and acceptable INR was 37.31% (1 028 times/2 755 times), 50.01% (1 378 times/2 755 times), respectively. TTR of target INR and acceptable INR was 46.04%(3 902.5 d/8 475.5 d), 59.49%(5 042 d/8 475.5 d) when the patients’ follow-up was up to six months and FTTR of target INR and acceptable INR value of these patients was 46.81%(206 times/440 times), 60.45%(266 times/440 times). During the follow-up, there were 3 thromboembolism events, 1 transient physical abnormal activity, and 1 thrombogenesis in the left atrium, and there was no bleeding and death events. Conclusion The strategy of anticoagulation management used in our study is reasonable. In order to further improve the patients’ quality of anticoagulant therapy, it is necessary to start anticoagulation after operation as soon as possible, to strengthen the education of patients with anticoagulant knowledge and to increase INR test frequency properly.
Objective To evaluate the long-term anticoagulation outcomes of target international normalized ratio (INR) 1.60 to 2.20 and weekly dosage adjustment of warfarin in patients after mechanical heart valve replacement. Methods Outpatients after mechanical heart valve replacement at least 6 months were registered continually from July 2011 to July 2016 in department of cardiothoracic surgery at Zigong No.4 People's Hospital and West China Hospital. There were 1 690 females (70.62%) and 703 males (29.38%) with a median age of 47 years, ranging from 14 to 80 years. All patients were followed up for 6-61 months. Target INR was 1.60 to 2.20 and warfarin dosage were adjusted weekly. Unexpected bleeding, thrombogenesis and thromboembolism, time in therapeutic range (TTR) and fraction of TTR (FTTR) were recorded and calculated to evaluate the outcome of anticoagulation management. Results A total of 2 393 patients with 26 521 INR values were included for data analysis. INR values varied from 0.90-8.39 (1.82±0.45) and required weekly doses of warfarin were 1.75-61.25 (21.72±7.39) mg. TTR of target INR and acceptable INR was 59.38% (1 449 514.0 days/2 441 060.0 days) and 73.57% (1 795 971.0 days/2 441 060.0 days), respectively. FTTR of target INR and acceptable INR were 50.71% (13 450 times/26 521 times), 65.25% (17 305 times/26 521 times). During the follow-up , anticoagulation-related complications included: cerebral infarction in 21 patients (complete recovery in 18 patients, physical activity disorder in 3 patients), cerebral hemorrhage in 4 patients (death in 1 patient, complete recovery in 3 patients), severe gastrointestinal bleeding in 3 patients (completely recovered) and uterine bleeding in 1 patient (surgical removal of the uterus). Conclusion Target INR 1.60–2.20 and warfarin weekly dosage adjustment for patients after mechanical heart valve replacement is reasonable and safe.
Objective To explore the safety and efficacy of mobile APP in telemanagement for patients who received oral warfarin anticoagulant therapy after mechanical heart valve replacement. Methods A prospective cohort study was performed. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 80 patients who underwent mechanical heart valve replacement for more than half a year and received oral warfarin anticoagulant therapy in outpatient department were included in our hospital from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017. These patients were divided into a telemanagement group (40 paitents, telemanagement using mobile APP) and a control group (40 patients, anticoagulant management in outpatient clinics) according to patients' wishes and local hospital international normalized ratio (INR) monitoring conditions. After 12-month follow-up, clinical effect of the two groups was compared. The INR, time in therapeutic range (TTR), fraction in therapeutic range (FTTR), anticoagulation-related complications and patient satisfaction were analyzed. Results During the follow-up period of anticoagulation, there was no significant difference in INR between the two groups (P=0.732). The average interval of INR monitoring in the telemanagement group was 3-65 (21.4 ± 12.5) days, while that in the control group was 7-93 (39.6 ± 14.7) days (P=0.012). TTR was 42.7% (6 027.6 d/14 116.0 d) in the control group and 67.9% (10 168.6 d/14 972.0 d) in the telemanagement group (P=0.018). And FTTR in the two groups was 45.6% (144/316) and 67.1% (432/644), respectively (P=0.015). No serious thromboembolism or hemorrhage events occurred in the 80 patients during the 12-month follow-up period. There was no significant difference in the incidence of anticoagulation-related complications, general bleeding and embolism between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion For patients with stable anticoagulation after cardiac mechanical valve replacement, it is safe and effective to telemanagement by mobile APP. Telemanagement can increase the frequency of anticoagulation monitoring without increasing anticoagulation risk, meanwhile, it also could obtain more convenient and rapid consultation, save time and economic costs,and improve the quality of life and patient satisfaction.
ObjectiveTo explore the anticoagulant strategy of adjusting the dose of warfarin at different stages after mechanical valve replacement of mitral valve.MethodsClinical data of a total of 302 patients, including 76 males and 226 females, with an average age of 50.1±10.1 years, who underwent mechanical mitral valve replacement in the Chinese adult cardiac surgery database from 2013 to 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the dose adjustment strategy of taking warfarin, the patients were divided into a D group (adjusting warfarin dose in days) and a W group (adjusting warfarin dose in weeks) to evaluate the anti-coagulation effect of warfarin.ResultsThe total follow-up time was 423277 d (1159.7 years). There was no significant difference in the overall anticoagulant strength, and the warfarin dose adjusted in days was better in the early postoperative period (P<0.05), especially in patients over 60 years. It was better to adjust warfarin dose in weeks in the middle and long periods (P<0.05), especially in patients ≤40 years. In terms of the stability of anticoagulation, it was better to adjust the dosage of warfarin in weeks (P<0.05). It was better to adjust the dosage of warfarin in weeks for early, middle- and long-term anticoagulant therapy after operation (P<0.05), especially in the females aged >40 and ≤50 years.ConclusionWithin the target range of international normalized ratio (1.5-2.5), the anticoagulant strategy of adjusting warfarin dose in days after mechanical valve replacement of mitral valve can achieve a better anticoagulant strength, and adjusting the dosage of warfarin in weeks is better in the middle- and long-term after operation. In general, the anticoagulant effect is more stable in the short term when warfarin dose is adjusted on a weekly basis.