Objective To explore the effect of nandrolone phenylpropionate (NP) on rats’ fibroblasts after injury. Methods After being isolated from granulation tissue of a onemonth wistar rat,the fibroblasts(FB) were grouped into 5 groups and cultured in RPMI1640 and 5%FBS culturing liquid with 0.5,1.0,5.0,10.0,and 15.0 μg/ml NP respectively. The control group was cultured in RPMI1640 and 5% FBS culturing liquid Fibroblasts were isolated from granulation tissue of a onemonth Wistar rat and cultured with RPMI1640 culturing liquid with 5% FBS added different doses of NP from 0.5～15.0 μg/ml in NPgroup, but only 5% FBS for the control group. Cell validity of fibroblasts was measured by MTT. The proliferetive index(PI) of the most effected group was measured by flow cytometry. Results Compared with control group, higher FB validity occured in every NP group (P＜0.05) The PI of FB in every NP group measured by flow cytometry was significantly higher than that in controlgroup(Plt;0.01). Conclusion NP can promote the replication and proliferation of FB.
Objective To examine the clinical utility of postoperation symptom inventory. Methods According to the current cancer symptom assessment tools, clinical guidelines and expert interviews, we preliminarily selected 10 common symptoms as an alternative item. Postoperative symptom assessment scale of lung cancer patients was formulated through expert evaluation. And 383 patients in eight hospitals were evaluated and validated using the scale to analyze the reliability and validity. Results Postoperation symptom inventory was easy to operate and evaluate for postoperative lung cancer patients in 8 symptoms (pain, shortness of breath, fatigue, cough, insomnia, throat pain, sweating and constipation). The scale was with high reliability. Cronbach' s α was 0.888. This scale was also with reliable validity. Content validity index was 0.900. There were two common factors with high cumulative proportion in variance(47.70% and 57.46%). And each question had high factor load and communality (>0.40) in the exploratory factor analysis. Conclusion The postoperation symptom inventory has excellent reliability and validity in patients with lung cancer surgery.
ObjectivesTo evaluate the reliability and validity on quality criteria for clinical nursing practice guidelines.MethodsFive appraisers were included to assess two clinical nursing practice guidelines using the quality criteria for clinical nursing practice guidelines and AGREE Ⅱ. ICC and coefficient of consistency were adopted to assess the reliability and validity of the appraisal tools.ResultsICC for two guidelines of AIDS and infusion by the quality criteria for clinical nursing practice guidelines were 0.979 and 0.890. ICC for two guidelines of AIDS and infusion by AGREE Ⅱ were 0.957 and 0.887. The coefficient of consistency for guidelines of AIDS and infusion by the two appraisal tools were 0.880 and 0.886, both were highly consistent.ConclusionsThe quality criteria for clinical nursing practice guidelines has good reliability and validity and can be used as appraisal tool for quality evaluation of clinical nursing practice guidelines. It is strongly recommended that the users should understand the appraisal tool or should be trained to decrease the bias.
ObjectiveBy establishing a set of evaluation system for thoracoscopic clinical function and applicability, to evaluate and compare the advantages and disadvantages of different brands of thoracoscopes, and to provide some suggestions for the innovation and upgrade of thoracoscopes, especially for the domestic thoracoscopes.MethodsThe project coordination team initially formulated the evaluation index system for the clinical function and applicability of thoracoscope by querying literature and brainstorming. The Delphi expert consultation method was used to distribute questionnaires to the selected experts. Experts provided scores which were based on the importance of each indicator, and clarified the basis of their judgment and the familiarity with the evaluation indicators. After two rounds of screening by Delphi method, a thoracoscopic clinical function and applicability satisfactory questionnaire was formed. The appropriate sample for pre-investigation was selected, and the reliability and validity were tested. The index composition was adjusted based on the results of the test to form a final evaluation scale.ResultsThe project coordination team initially formulated 24 thoracoscope-related evaluation indicators. After two rounds of experts consultation, the item "brightness adjustment" was deleted without any additional entries. The positive coefficients of the experts in the first round and the second round were 100.0% and 80.0%, respectively. The two rounds of authoritative coefficients were 0.86 and 0.90, and the coordination coefficients were 0.272 (P<0.001) and 0.523 (P<0.001), respectively. A total of 140 questionnaires were issued in this pre-investigation. The recovery rate was 100.0% and the effective rate was 90.0%. The Cronbach's α value of the scale was 0.936, and the Spearman-Brown split-half reliability coefficient was 0.972. The factor analysis finally extracted 3 common factors. The total variance of the cumulative interpretation was 70.9%. The three common factors were named "operation related", "image related" and "device related".ConclusionThe evaluation index system developed in this study has good reliability and validity, and can be used as a tool to evaluate the clinical function and applicability of thoracoscopes.
The COSMIN-RoB checklist includes three sections with a total of 10 boxes, which is used to evaluate risk of bias of studies on content validity, internal structure, and other measurement properties. COSMIN classifies reliability, measurement error, criteria validity, hypothesis testing for construct validity, and responsiveness as other measurement properties, which primarily focus on the quality of the (sub)scale as a whole, rather than on the item level. Among the five measurement properties, reliability, measurement error and criteria validity are the most widely used in the studies. Therefore, this paper aims to interpret COSMIN-RoB checklist with examples to guide researchers to evaluate the risk of bias of the studies on reliability, measurement error and criteria validity of PROMs.
Measurement properties studies of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) aims to validate the measurement properties of PROMs. In the process of designing and statistical analysis of these measurement properties studies, bias will occur if there are any defects, which will affect the quality of PROMs. Therefore, the COSMIN (consensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement instruments) team has developed the COSMIN risk of bias (COSMIN-RoB) checklist to evaluate risk of bias of studies on measurement properties of PROMs. The checklist can be used to develop systematic reviews of PROMs measurement properties, and for PROMs developers, it can also be used to guide the research design in the measurement tool development process for reducing bias. At present, similar assessment tools are lacking in China. Therefore, this article aims to introduce the primary contents of COSMIN-RoB checklist and to interpret how to evaluate risk of bias of the internal structure studies of PROMs with examples.
ObjectiveTo develop a patient satisfaction evaluation scale for day surgery and test its reliability and validity, so as to provide a scientific and effective tool for day surgery patient satisfaction assessment.MethodsThe literature review method was used to form an entry pool, and the initial version of the scale was formed in conjunction with the expert review method. And then a preliminary survey was conducted to obtain the tentative version of the scale. Finally, 290 day surgery patients discharged between June 15th and July 15th, 2019 were selected to accomplish a survey to check the reliability and validity of the scale.ResultsFinally, a day surgery patient satisfaction evaluation scale was formed, containing 3 stages (pre-hospital, hospitalization, and postdischarge follow-up), 3 dimensions (medical staff evaluation, medical service evaluation, and environment and process evaluation), and 40 items. After the formal survey, the overall Cronbach’s α coefficient of the scale was 0.980, the Spearman-Brown coefficient was 0.933, the Guttman’s half-coefficient was 0.932, and the content validity was 0.87-1.00.ConclusionThe day surgery patient satisfaction evaluation scale was proven good reliability and validity, which can be used as a measurement tool for day surgery patients and applied to clinical practice.
Objective To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS) in preoperative anxiety in patients with local anesthesia. Methods From May to December 2020, a convenient sampling method was used to conduct an APAIS questionnaire survey on patients undergoing percutaneous renal biopsy in the Department of Nephrology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, and the reliability and validity of the scale were analyzed. ResultsA total of 460 questionnaires were distributed and 444 valid questionnaires were returned, with a valid response rate of 96.5%. The Cronbach α of APAIS was 0.896, the Guttman split-half reliability was 0.811, and the content validity index was 0.891. The model fit was 12.122 for the chi-square fit index/degree of freedom, 0.916 for the goodness-of-fit index, 0.902 for the value-added fit index, 0.079 for the root mean square error of approximation, and 0.946 for the comparative fit index. The APAIS anxiety subscale score was positively correlated with the 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale score (r=0.518, P<0.001). Conclusion The APAIS has good reliability and validity for evaluating the level of preoperative anxiety in patients with local anesthesia, but the application of the scale in other conditions requires further testing.
Objective To evaluate the reliability and validity of the three-dimensional motion capture analysis system COFT-Motion® in evaluating the active range of motion of upper limbs in healthy subjects, and provide objective basis for its clinical application. Methods From January to March 2022, healthy subjects were publicly recruited for enrollment. The evaluator applied the three-dimensional motion capture analysis system COFT-Motion® and angle ruler to evaluate the active range of motion of the shoulder joint (flexion, extension, adduction, abduction) and elbow joint (flexion, extension) in healthy subjects. Pearson correlation analysis was used to evaluate validity, and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to evaluate reliability. Results There was a positive correlation between the measurements of COFT-Motion® and the angle ruler of the active range of motion of upper limbs in healthy subjects. The Pearson correlation coefficients for active range of motion of the shoulder joint (flexion, extension, adduction, abduction) and elbow joint (flexion, extension) were 0.913, 0.964, 0.961, 0.941, 0.864, and 0.919, respectively (P<0.05). The results of using COFT-Motion® by different evaluators to evaluate the active range of motion of healthy subjects’ shoulder joints (flexion, extension, adduction, abduction) and elbow joints (flexion, extension) showed that the ICC values were 0.892, 0.942, 0.961, 0.988, 0.989, and 0.928, respectively (P<0.05). The results of repeated evaluations by the same evaluator showed that the ICC values were 0.795, 0.916, 0.900, 0.868, 0.918, and 0.911, respectively (P<0.05). Conclusion The application of the three-dimensional motion capture analysis system COFT-Motion® in healthy subjects has good validity and reliability. However, due to the limited sample size and subject of the study, further promotion and application of the system still need to be further explored.
Objective To verify the reliability and validity of a self-developed satisfaction evaluation questionnaire for outpatient department employees in public hospitals, and to provide suitable tools for conducting such surveys. Methods Two anonymous surveys were conducted on all employees of the Outpatient Department of West China Hospital of Sichuan University in July 2019 and November 2021, respectively. Questionnaire items were screened using methods such as item distribution, coefficient of variation, and decision value, and the reliability and validity of the questionnaire were evaluated using Spearman-Brown coefficient and Cronbach’s α coefficient, exploratory factor analysis, and confirmatory factor analysis. Results The final questionnaire retained 14 items, which could be divided into two dimensions: work conditions and interpersonal environment, and the overall fit index of structural equation model model were as follows: χ2/ν=6.957, standardized root mean square residual was 0.061, root mean square error of approximation was 0.147, goodness-of-fit index was 0.796, adjusted goodness-of-fit index was 0.719, normed fit index was 0.849, relative fit index as 0.819, incremental fit index was 0.868, Tucker-Lewis Index was 0.841, comparative fit index was 0.867. The combined reliability of the two factors in the questionnaire was 0.94 and 0.91, respectively. The average variance extraction was 0.67 and 0.76, respectively, and the square root of the average variance extraction was 0.82 and 0.87, both of which were greater than the correlation coefficient of 0.71 between the two factors. The Spearman-Brown coefficient of the final questionnaire was 0.913, and the Cronbach’s α coefficients for the overall and two dimensions were 0.953, 0.937, and 0.910, respectively. Conclusion The reliability and validity of the satisfaction evaluation questionnaire for outpatient department employees in public hospitals are good and can be applied to practical surveys.