To visualize and quantify the hemodynamics in the aortic arch in normal individuals, we used velocity distribution, retrograde flow, vortex formation, and mean energy loss (mEL) at different cardiac cycles in our study. We performed Vector flow mapping (VFM) analysis by using echocardiography in 87 healthy volunteers. The results showed that ① in different sections of the aortic arch, a skewed peak flow velocity (Vp) always appeared in the period of rapid ejection but in different distribution. The systolic flow in the entire aortic arch rose rapidly from near-zero at the point of iso-volumetric contraction to the peak velocity at the period of rapid ejection, and then decreased gradually; ② In the period of iso-volumetric relaxation, retrograde flow and vortex were observed in all subjects in the inner wall of the entire aortic arch; and ③ The change rule of mEL in the entire aortic arch was similar to that of flow velocity. VFM can provide insights into the intra-aortic arch flow patterns, and offer essential fundamentals about flow features associated with common aortic diseases.
We have tried to explore the energy loss (EL) within the left ventricle in hypertension by using vector flow mapping (VFM) to detect left ventricular hemodynamic changes in hypertensive patients as early as possible and reflect changes of left ventricular function in hypertension by using EL. Twenty-one hypertensive patients with increased left ventricle mass index (LVMI), 14 hypertensive patients with normal LVMI and 22 control subjects were enrolled in this study. Systolic and diastolic EL derived from VFM within the left ventricle and E/e' by dual Doppler were recorded and analyzed. Compared with those of the controls, diastolic and systolic EL were significantly increased in hypertensive group (P<0.05). In diastole, EL=0.439×SBP (systolic blood pressure)–8.349; in systole, EL=0.385×SBP+0.644×LVMI–10.854. And the EL was positively correlated with E/e', but there was no significant correlation between EL and ejection fraction (EF) in the pooled population. The study shows that the increased EL can help us detect changes of left ventricular hemodynamic in hypertensive patients. It needs further investigation to prove whether EL within the left ventricle could be a new parameter to evaluate diastolic function. SBP and LVMI are the independent predictors for systolic EL, while SBP is the independent predictor for diastolic EL.
This study aims to explore the intraventricular pressure difference (IVPD) within left ventricle in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) by using the relative pressure imaging (RPI) of vector flow mapping (VFM). Twenty patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) and thirty control subjects were enrolled in the study. Systolic and diastolic IVPD derived from VFM within left ventricle and conventional echocardiographic parameters were analyzed. It was found that the B-A IVPD of left ventricle in PAF patients showed the same pattern as controls—single peak and single valley during systole and double peaks and double valleys during diastole. Basal IVPD was the main component of base to apex IVPD (B-A IVPD). The isovolumetric systolic IVPD was associated with early systolic IVPD, early systolic IVPD was associated with late systolic IVPD, and late systolic IVPD was associated with isovolumic diastolic IVPD (all P < 0.05). The B-A IVPD and basal IVPD during isovolumetric systole, early systole, late systole and isovolumetric diastole in PAF patients significantly decreased (all P < 0.05). The study shows that the B-A IVPD pattern of the PAF group is the same as controls, but systolic B-A IVPD and basal IVPD are significantly reduced in PAF patients. VFM-derived RPI can evaluate left ventricular IVPD in PAF patients, providing a visually quantitative method for evaluating left ventricular hemodynamic mechanics in the patients with PAF.