Comparison of the screening efficiency of epiretinal membrane using confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope imaging and color fundus camera in elderly people_Chinese Journal of Ocular Fundus Diseases

Authors：

HuoYanjiao , GuoYan , YangLihong ,  WeiWenbin

Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Science Key Laboratory, Beijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100730, China;

Corresponding author：

WeiWenbin, Email: weiwenbintr@163.com

Keywords：

Retinal diseases/diagnosis; Macula lutea; Tomography; optical coherence

DOI：

10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005-1015.2016.06.012

Video：

Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Objective To determine the positive results of confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope (cSLO) based retinal imaging and traditional color fundus camera in screening epiretinal membrane (ERM) in elderly people. Methods A total of 184 retired staffs from certain company (363 eyes) were included in this study, 153 were men (304 eyes) and 31 were women (59 eyes). The mean age was 74.35 years (range 47-92 years). All subjects were underwent fundus imaging using cSLO technology and traditional color fundus camera and Cirrus high definition optical coherence tomography (HD-OCT). The imaging quality of two technologies were analyzed and compared according to the evaluation standards. The positive accordance rate was used to compare between two modes fundus imaging (cSLO technology and traditional color fundus camera) and HD-OCT. Results In 363 eyes, the positive number of screening ERM using HD-OCT was 122 eyes (33.6%); the positive number of traditional color fundus camera was 33 eyes (9.1%); the positive number of cSLO imaging was 76 eyes (20.9%). The HD-OCT positive accordance rate of screening ERM using traditional color fundus camera and cSLO technology were 27.0% vs. 62.3%. The HD-OCT positive accordance rate of screening ERM using cSLO technology was significant higher than traditional color fundus camera (χ²=30.81, P < 0.001). Conclusion The HD-OCT positive accordance rate of screening ERM in elderly people was higher using cSLO technology than using traditional color fundus camera.

Citation： HuoYanjiao, GuoYan, YangLihong, WeiWenbin. Comparison of the screening efficiency of epiretinal membrane using confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope imaging and color fundus camera in elderly people. Chinese Journal of Ocular Fundus Diseases, 2016, 32(6): 615-618. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005-1015.2016.06.012 Copy

1.	Iannetti L, Accoriniti M, Malagola R, et al. Role of the intravitreal growth factors in the pathogenesis of idiopathic epiretinal membrane[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2011, 52(8):5786-5789.DOI:10.1167/iovs.10-7116.
2.	Kampik A, Kenyon KR, Michels RG, et al. Epiretinal and vitreous membrances:comparative study of 56 cases.1981[J]. Retina, 2005, 25(5 Suppl):S1445-1454.
3.	Inoue M, Kadonosono K. Macular diseases:epiretinal membrane[J]. Dev Ophthalmol, 2014, 54:159-163. DOI:10.1159/000360462.
4.	Kirkpatrick JN, Manivannan A, Gupta AK, et al. Fundus imaging in patients with cataract:role for a variable wavelength scanning laser ophthalmoscope[J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 1995, 79(10):892-899.
5.	Etten PG, Brouwere DD, Westers P, et al.Zero dilation ophthalmoscopy[J]. J Ophthalmic Photogr, 2014, 36(2):55-62.
6.	霍妍佼, 魏文斌.眼底成像技术新进展--共聚焦激光扫描检眼镜[J].国际眼科纵览, 2015, 39(4):224-228. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-5803.2015.04.002.Huo YJ, Wei WB. Progress in fundus imaging:confocal scanning laser opthalmoscope[J]. Int Rev Ophthalmol, 2015, 39(4):224-228. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-5803.2015.04.002.
7.	Cheung N, Tan SP, Lee SY, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for epiretinal membrance:the Singapore Epidemiolog of Eye Disease Study[J/OL]. Br J Ophthalmol, 2016, 2016:E1[2016-01-24]. http://bjo.bmj.com/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long & pmid=27343209. DOI:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-308563.[published online ahead of print].
8.	霍妍佼, 杨丽红, 崔蕊, 等.共焦激光扫描检眼镜与眼底彩色照相对视网膜和脉络膜病变的检出比较[J].中华眼底病杂志, 2016, 32(3):270-274. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005-1015.2016.03.010.Huo YJ, Yang LH, Cui R, et al. Comparison of confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope and color fundus camera to assess retinal and choroidal disease[J]. Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis, 2016, 32(3):270-274. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005-1015.2016.03.010.
9.	Reznicek L, Dabov S, Kayat B, et al. Scanning laser, en face, retinal imaging of epiretinal membranes[J]. Saui J Ophthalmol, 2014, 28(2):134-138. DOI:10.1016/j.sjopt.2014.03.009.

1. Iannetti L, Accoriniti M, Malagola R, et al. Role of the intravitreal growth factors in the pathogenesis of idiopathic epiretinal membrane[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2011, 52(8):5786-5789.DOI:10.1167/iovs.10-7116.
2. Kampik A, Kenyon KR, Michels RG, et al. Epiretinal and vitreous membrances:comparative study of 56 cases.1981[J]. Retina, 2005, 25(5 Suppl):S1445-1454.
3. Inoue M, Kadonosono K. Macular diseases:epiretinal membrane[J]. Dev Ophthalmol, 2014, 54:159-163. DOI:10.1159/000360462.
4. Kirkpatrick JN, Manivannan A, Gupta AK, et al. Fundus imaging in patients with cataract:role for a variable wavelength scanning laser ophthalmoscope[J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 1995, 79(10):892-899.
5. Etten PG, Brouwere DD, Westers P, et al.Zero dilation ophthalmoscopy[J]. J Ophthalmic Photogr, 2014, 36(2):55-62.
6. 霍妍佼, 魏文斌.眼底成像技术新进展--共聚焦激光扫描检眼镜[J].国际眼科纵览, 2015, 39(4):224-228. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-5803.2015.04.002.Huo YJ, Wei WB. Progress in fundus imaging:confocal scanning laser opthalmoscope[J]. Int Rev Ophthalmol, 2015, 39(4):224-228. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-5803.2015.04.002.
7. Cheung N, Tan SP, Lee SY, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for epiretinal membrance:the Singapore Epidemiolog of Eye Disease Study[J/OL]. Br J Ophthalmol, 2016, 2016:E1[2016-01-24]. http://bjo.bmj.com/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long & pmid=27343209. DOI:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-308563.[published online ahead of print].
8. 霍妍佼, 杨丽红, 崔蕊, 等.共焦激光扫描检眼镜与眼底彩色照相对视网膜和脉络膜病变的检出比较[J].中华眼底病杂志, 2016, 32(3):270-274. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005-1015.2016.03.010.Huo YJ, Yang LH, Cui R, et al. Comparison of confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope and color fundus camera to assess retinal and choroidal disease[J]. Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis, 2016, 32(3):270-274. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005-1015.2016.03.010.
9. Reznicek L, Dabov S, Kayat B, et al. Scanning laser, en face, retinal imaging of epiretinal membranes[J]. Saui J Ophthalmol, 2014, 28(2):134-138. DOI:10.1016/j.sjopt.2014.03.009.

Chinese Journal of Ocular Fundus Diseases

Comparison of the screening efficiency of epiretinal membrane using confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope imaging and color fundus camera in elderly people

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Previous Article

Next Article

Format

Content