Progress of Comparison between Minimally Invasive Video Assisted Thoracic Surgery and Traditional Median Sternotomy for Mitral Valve Surgery_Chinese Journal of Clinical Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Authors：

CHENGBo ,  GUOHui-ming

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangzhou 510080, P. R. China;

Corresponding author：

GUOHui-ming, Email: guohuiming@vip.tom.com

Keywords：

Minimally invasive; Thoracoscopy; Sternotomy; Mitral valve surgery; Review

DOI：

10.7507/1007-4848.20160239

Video：

Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Cardiac surgery has a gradual change from traditional median sternotomy to minimally invasive surgery due to the appearance and application of peripheral extracorporeal circulation. There are great differences in the clinical practice of two different surgical methods in mitral valve operation. Minimally invasive thoracic surgery has the advantages of less trauma, less bleeding, faster recovery, beauty and so on. However, such surgery also has its weaknesses, such as longer learning curve, narrow operation space and high requirements of equipment. To compare the differences of early and long-term results in mitral valve operation between traditional median sternotomy and minimally invasive thoracic surgery is to better summarize and operate minimally invasive thoracic surgery for mitral valve surgery.

Citation： CHENG Bo, GUO Hui-ming. Progress of Comparison between Minimally Invasive Video Assisted Thoracic Surgery and Traditional Median Sternotomy for Mitral Valve Surgery. Chinese Journal of Clinical Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2016, 23(10): 1006-1011. doi: 10.7507/1007-4848.20160239 Copy

1.	Gibbon JH. Application of a mechanical heart and lung apparatus to cardiac surgery. Minn Med, 1954, 37(2): 171-185.
2.	Fromes Y, Gaillard D, Ponzio O, et al. Reduction of the inflammatory response following coronary bypass grafting with total minimal ertracorporeal circulation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2002, 22(4): 527-533.
3.	Carpentier A1, Loulmet D, Carpentier A, et al. Open heart operation under videosurgery and minithoracotomy. First case (mitral valvuloplasty) operated with success. C Racad Sci Paris Life, 1996, 319(3): 219-223.
4.	Mariscalco G, Musumeci F.The minithoracotomy approach: a safe and effective alternative for heart valve surgery. Ann Thorac Surg, 2014, 97(1): 356-364.
5.	Svensson LG, Atik FA, Cosgrove DM, et al. Minimally invasive versus conventional mitral valve surgery: A propensity-matched comparison. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2010, 139(4): 926-932.
6.	Chitwood WR, Wixon CI, Elbeery JR, et al. Video-assisted minimally invasive mitral valve surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 1997, 114 (5): 773-780.
7.	Holzhey DM, Shi W, Borger MA, et al. Minimally invasive versus sternotomy approach for mitral valve surgery in patients greater than 70 years old: a propensity-matched comparison. Ann Thorac Surg, 2011, 91(2): 401-405.
8.	Suri RM, Schaff HV, Meyer SR, et al. Thoracoscopic versus open mitral valve repair: a propensity score analysis of early outcomes.Ann Thorac Surg, 2009, 88(4): 1185-1190.
9.	Murzi M, Miceli A, Di Stefano G, et al. Minimally invasive right thoracotomy approach for mitral valve surgery in patients with previous sternotomy: A single institution experience with 173 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2014, 148(6): 2763-2768.
10.	Iribarne A, Easterwood R, Russo MJ, et al. Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive versus traditional sternotomy mitral valve surgery in elderly patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2012, 143(4-Sup): 86-90.
11.	Iribarne A, Easterwood R, Russo MJ, et al. A minimally invasive approach is more cost-effective than a traditional sternotomy approach for mitral valve surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2011, 142(6): 1507-1514.
12.	Murphy GJ, Reeves BC, Rogers CA, et al. Increased mortality, postoperative morbidity and cost after red blood cell transfusion in patients having cardiac surgery. Circulation, 2007, 116(22): 2544-2552.
13.	Matzelle SJ, Murphy MJ, Weightman WM, et al. Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery using single dose antegrade custodiol cardioplegia. Heart Lung Circ, 2014, 23(9): 863-868.
14.	El-Fiky MM, El-Sayegh T, El-Beishry AS, et al. Limited right anterolateral thoracotomy for mitral valve surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2000, 179(6): 710-713.
15.	Dogan S, Aybek T, Risteski PS, et al. Minimally invasive port access versus conventional mitral valve surgery: prospective randomized study. Ann Thorac Surg, 2005, 79(2): 492-498.
16.	Iribarne A, Russo MJ, Easterwood R, et al. Minimally invasive versus sternotomy approach for mitral valve surgery: apropensity analysis. Ann Thorac Surg, 2010, 90(5): 1471-1477.
17.	Cheng DCH, Martin J, Lal A, et al. Minimally invasive versus conventional open mitral valve surgery: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Innovations (Phila), 2011, 6(2): 84-103.
18.	Murzi M, Cerillo AG, Miceli A, et al. Antegrade and retrograde arterial perfusion strategy in minimally invasive mitral-valve surgery: a propensity score analysis on 1280 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2013, 43(6): 167-172.
19.	Modi P, Hassan A, Chitwood WR, et al. Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2008, 34(5): 943-952.
20.	Sharony R, Grossi EA, Saunders PC, et al. Minimally invasive reoperative isolated valve surgery: early and mid-term results. J Card Surg, 2006, 21(3): 240-244.
21.	Walther T, Falk V, Metz S, et al. Pain and quality of life after minimally invasive versus conventional cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg, 1999, 67(6): 1643-1647.
22.	Sündermann SH, Sromicki J, Rodriguez Cetina Biefer H, et al. Mitral valve surgery: Right lateral minithoracotomy or sternotomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2014, 148(5): 1989-1995.
23.	Grossi EA, Loulmet DF, Schwartz CF, et al. Evolution of operative techniques and perfusion strategies for minimally invasive mitral valve repair. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2012, 143(4): 68-70.
24.	Grossi EA, Galloway AC, Ribakove GH, et al. Impact of minimally invasive valvular heart surgery: a case-control study. Ann Thorac Surg, 2001, 71(3): 807-810.
25.	Ding C, Jiang DM, Tao KY, et al. Anterolateral minithoracotomy versus median sternotomy for mitral valve disease: a meta-analysis. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B, 2014,15(6): 522-532.
26.	Casselman FP, Van Slycke S, Dom H, et al. Endoscopic mitral valve repair: feasible, reproducible, and durable. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2003, 125(2): 273-282.
27.	Speziale G, Nasso G, Esposito G, et al. Results of mitral valve repair for Barlow disease (bileaflet prolapse) via right minithoracotomy versus conventional median sternotomy: A randomized trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2011, 142(1): 77-83.
28.	Moscarelli M, Cerillo A, Athanasiou T, et al. Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery in high-risk patients: operating outside the boxplot. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg, 2016, 22(6): 756-761.
29.	Botta L, Cannata A, Bruschi G, et al. Minimally invasive approach for redo mitral valve surgery. J Thorac Dis, 2013, 5 (Suppl 6): S686-S693.
30.	McClure RS, Cohn LH, Wiegerinck E, et al. Early and late outcomes in minimally invasive mitral valve repair: An eleven-year experience in 707 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2009, 137(1): 70-75.
31.	刘健, 张晓慎,郭惠明, 等. 完全胸腔镜再次三尖瓣置换手术1例.中华胸心血管外科杂志, 2014, 30(6): 379.
32.	Brittain EL, Goyal SK, Sample MA. et al. Minimally invasive fibrillating mitral valve replacement for patients with advanced cardiomyopathy: A safe and effective approach to treat a complex problem.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2014, 148(5): 2045-2051.
33.	Atluri P, Woo YJ, Goldstone AB, et al. Minimally Invasive mitral valve surgery can be performed with optimal outcomes in the presence of left ventricular dysfunction. Ann Thorac Surg, 2013, 96(5): 1596-1601.
34.	Arcidi JM Jr, Rodriguez E, Elbeery JR, et al. Fifteen-year experience with minimally invasive approach for reoperations involving the mitral valve.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2012,143(5):1062-1068.
35.	Asher CR, DiMengo JM, Arheart KL, et al. Atrial fibrillation early postoperatively following minimally invasive cardiac valvular surgery. Am J Cardiol,1999, 84(6): 744-749.
36.	Passage J, Edwards J, Almeida A, et al. Guidelines for the safe introduction of minimally invasive mitral valve surgery. Heart Lung Circ, 2013, 22(9): 703-704.
37.	Holzhey DM, Seeburger J, Misfeld M, et al. Learning minimally invasive mitral valve surgery a cumulative sum sequential probability analysis of 3895 operations from a single high-volume center. Circulation, 2013, 128(5): 483-491.
38.	Murzi M, Miceli A, Cerillo AG, et al. Training surgeons in minimally invasive mitral valve repair: a single institution experience. Ann Thorac Surg, 2014, 98(3): 884-889.
39.	Iribarne A, Easterwood R, Yang J, et al. Retroperitoneal hematoma with abdominal compartment syndrome during minimally invasive mitral valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg, 2010, 89(4): 17-18.
40.	Vollroth M, Seeburger J, Garbade J, et al. Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery is a very safe procedure with very low rates of conversion to full sternotomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2012, 42(1): 13-15.
41.	Murzi M, Cerillo AG, Bevilacqua S, et al. Enhancing departmental quality control in minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: a single-institution experience. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2012, 42(3): 500-506.
42.	Cohn LH, Byrne JG. Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: current status.Tex Heart Inst J, 2013, 40(5): 575-576.
43.	Shibata T, Kato Y, Motoki M, et al. Mitral valve repair with loop technique via median sternotomy in 180 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2015, 47(3): 491-496.
44.	Tang P, Onaitis M, Gaca JG, et al. Right Minithoracotomy Versus median sternotomy for mitral valve surgery: a propensity matched study. Ann Thorac Surg, 2015,100(2): 575-581.
45.	Sündermann SH, Sromicki J, Rodriguez Cetina Biefer H, et al. Mitral valve surgery:right lateral minithoracotomy or sternotomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2014, 148(5): 1989-1995.
46.	Reser D, van Hemelrijck M, Pavicevic J, et al. Repair rate and durability of video assisted minimally invasive mitral valve surgery. J Card Surg, 2014, 29(6): 766-771.
47.	Petracek MR, Leacche M, Solenkova N, et al. Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery expands the surgical options for high-risk patients. Ann Surg, 2011, 254(4): 606-611.

1. Gibbon JH. Application of a mechanical heart and lung apparatus to cardiac surgery. Minn Med, 1954, 37(2): 171-185.
2. Fromes Y, Gaillard D, Ponzio O, et al. Reduction of the inflammatory response following coronary bypass grafting with total minimal ertracorporeal circulation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2002, 22(4): 527-533.
3. Carpentier A1, Loulmet D, Carpentier A, et al. Open heart operation under videosurgery and minithoracotomy. First case (mitral valvuloplasty) operated with success. C Racad Sci Paris Life, 1996, 319(3): 219-223.
4. Mariscalco G, Musumeci F.The minithoracotomy approach: a safe and effective alternative for heart valve surgery. Ann Thorac Surg, 2014, 97(1): 356-364.
5. Svensson LG, Atik FA, Cosgrove DM, et al. Minimally invasive versus conventional mitral valve surgery: A propensity-matched comparison. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2010, 139(4): 926-932.
6. Chitwood WR, Wixon CI, Elbeery JR, et al. Video-assisted minimally invasive mitral valve surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 1997, 114 (5): 773-780.
7. Holzhey DM, Shi W, Borger MA, et al. Minimally invasive versus sternotomy approach for mitral valve surgery in patients greater than 70 years old: a propensity-matched comparison. Ann Thorac Surg, 2011, 91(2): 401-405.
8. Suri RM, Schaff HV, Meyer SR, et al. Thoracoscopic versus open mitral valve repair: a propensity score analysis of early outcomes.Ann Thorac Surg, 2009, 88(4): 1185-1190.
9. Murzi M, Miceli A, Di Stefano G, et al. Minimally invasive right thoracotomy approach for mitral valve surgery in patients with previous sternotomy: A single institution experience with 173 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2014, 148(6): 2763-2768.
10. Iribarne A, Easterwood R, Russo MJ, et al. Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive versus traditional sternotomy mitral valve surgery in elderly patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2012, 143(4-Sup): 86-90.
11. Iribarne A, Easterwood R, Russo MJ, et al. A minimally invasive approach is more cost-effective than a traditional sternotomy approach for mitral valve surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2011, 142(6): 1507-1514.
12. Murphy GJ, Reeves BC, Rogers CA, et al. Increased mortality, postoperative morbidity and cost after red blood cell transfusion in patients having cardiac surgery. Circulation, 2007, 116(22): 2544-2552.
13. Matzelle SJ, Murphy MJ, Weightman WM, et al. Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery using single dose antegrade custodiol cardioplegia. Heart Lung Circ, 2014, 23(9): 863-868.
14. El-Fiky MM, El-Sayegh T, El-Beishry AS, et al. Limited right anterolateral thoracotomy for mitral valve surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2000, 179(6): 710-713.
15. Dogan S, Aybek T, Risteski PS, et al. Minimally invasive port access versus conventional mitral valve surgery: prospective randomized study. Ann Thorac Surg, 2005, 79(2): 492-498.
16. Iribarne A, Russo MJ, Easterwood R, et al. Minimally invasive versus sternotomy approach for mitral valve surgery: apropensity analysis. Ann Thorac Surg, 2010, 90(5): 1471-1477.
17. Cheng DCH, Martin J, Lal A, et al. Minimally invasive versus conventional open mitral valve surgery: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Innovations (Phila), 2011, 6(2): 84-103.
18. Murzi M, Cerillo AG, Miceli A, et al. Antegrade and retrograde arterial perfusion strategy in minimally invasive mitral-valve surgery: a propensity score analysis on 1280 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2013, 43(6): 167-172.
19. Modi P, Hassan A, Chitwood WR, et al. Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2008, 34(5): 943-952.
20. Sharony R, Grossi EA, Saunders PC, et al. Minimally invasive reoperative isolated valve surgery: early and mid-term results. J Card Surg, 2006, 21(3): 240-244.
21. Walther T, Falk V, Metz S, et al. Pain and quality of life after minimally invasive versus conventional cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg, 1999, 67(6): 1643-1647.
22. Sündermann SH, Sromicki J, Rodriguez Cetina Biefer H, et al. Mitral valve surgery: Right lateral minithoracotomy or sternotomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2014, 148(5): 1989-1995.
23. Grossi EA, Loulmet DF, Schwartz CF, et al. Evolution of operative techniques and perfusion strategies for minimally invasive mitral valve repair. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2012, 143(4): 68-70.
24. Grossi EA, Galloway AC, Ribakove GH, et al. Impact of minimally invasive valvular heart surgery: a case-control study. Ann Thorac Surg, 2001, 71(3): 807-810.
25. Ding C, Jiang DM, Tao KY, et al. Anterolateral minithoracotomy versus median sternotomy for mitral valve disease: a meta-analysis. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B, 2014,15(6): 522-532.
26. Casselman FP, Van Slycke S, Dom H, et al. Endoscopic mitral valve repair: feasible, reproducible, and durable. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2003, 125(2): 273-282.
27. Speziale G, Nasso G, Esposito G, et al. Results of mitral valve repair for Barlow disease (bileaflet prolapse) via right minithoracotomy versus conventional median sternotomy: A randomized trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2011, 142(1): 77-83.
28. Moscarelli M, Cerillo A, Athanasiou T, et al. Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery in high-risk patients: operating outside the boxplot. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg, 2016, 22(6): 756-761.
29. Botta L, Cannata A, Bruschi G, et al. Minimally invasive approach for redo mitral valve surgery. J Thorac Dis, 2013, 5 (Suppl 6): S686-S693.
30. McClure RS, Cohn LH, Wiegerinck E, et al. Early and late outcomes in minimally invasive mitral valve repair: An eleven-year experience in 707 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2009, 137(1): 70-75.
31. 刘健, 张晓慎,郭惠明, 等. 完全胸腔镜再次三尖瓣置换手术1例.中华胸心血管外科杂志, 2014, 30(6): 379.
32. Brittain EL, Goyal SK, Sample MA. et al. Minimally invasive fibrillating mitral valve replacement for patients with advanced cardiomyopathy: A safe and effective approach to treat a complex problem.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2014, 148(5): 2045-2051.
33. Atluri P, Woo YJ, Goldstone AB, et al. Minimally Invasive mitral valve surgery can be performed with optimal outcomes in the presence of left ventricular dysfunction. Ann Thorac Surg, 2013, 96(5): 1596-1601.
34. Arcidi JM Jr, Rodriguez E, Elbeery JR, et al. Fifteen-year experience with minimally invasive approach for reoperations involving the mitral valve.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2012,143(5):1062-1068.
35. Asher CR, DiMengo JM, Arheart KL, et al. Atrial fibrillation early postoperatively following minimally invasive cardiac valvular surgery. Am J Cardiol,1999, 84(6): 744-749.
36. Passage J, Edwards J, Almeida A, et al. Guidelines for the safe introduction of minimally invasive mitral valve surgery. Heart Lung Circ, 2013, 22(9): 703-704.
37. Holzhey DM, Seeburger J, Misfeld M, et al. Learning minimally invasive mitral valve surgery a cumulative sum sequential probability analysis of 3895 operations from a single high-volume center. Circulation, 2013, 128(5): 483-491.
38. Murzi M, Miceli A, Cerillo AG, et al. Training surgeons in minimally invasive mitral valve repair: a single institution experience. Ann Thorac Surg, 2014, 98(3): 884-889.
39. Iribarne A, Easterwood R, Yang J, et al. Retroperitoneal hematoma with abdominal compartment syndrome during minimally invasive mitral valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg, 2010, 89(4): 17-18.
40. Vollroth M, Seeburger J, Garbade J, et al. Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery is a very safe procedure with very low rates of conversion to full sternotomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2012, 42(1): 13-15.
41. Murzi M, Cerillo AG, Bevilacqua S, et al. Enhancing departmental quality control in minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: a single-institution experience. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2012, 42(3): 500-506.
42. Cohn LH, Byrne JG. Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: current status.Tex Heart Inst J, 2013, 40(5): 575-576.
43. Shibata T, Kato Y, Motoki M, et al. Mitral valve repair with loop technique via median sternotomy in 180 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2015, 47(3): 491-496.
44. Tang P, Onaitis M, Gaca JG, et al. Right Minithoracotomy Versus median sternotomy for mitral valve surgery: a propensity matched study. Ann Thorac Surg, 2015,100(2): 575-581.
45. Sündermann SH, Sromicki J, Rodriguez Cetina Biefer H, et al. Mitral valve surgery:right lateral minithoracotomy or sternotomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2014, 148(5): 1989-1995.
46. Reser D, van Hemelrijck M, Pavicevic J, et al. Repair rate and durability of video assisted minimally invasive mitral valve surgery. J Card Surg, 2014, 29(6): 766-771.
47. Petracek MR, Leacche M, Solenkova N, et al. Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery expands the surgical options for high-risk patients. Ann Surg, 2011, 254(4): 606-611.

Previous Article
Protective Effect and Mechanism of Ulinastatin for Ventilation-induced Lung Injury in Rats
Next Article
Review and Prospect of Clinical Application of EuroSCORE

Chinese Journal of Clinical Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Progress of Comparison between Minimally Invasive Video Assisted Thoracic Surgery and Traditional Median Sternotomy for Mitral Valve Surgery

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Previous Article

Next Article

Format

Content