1. |
Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin, 2015, 65(2): 87-108.
|
2. |
Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, et al, eds. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2011. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute, 2014.
|
3. |
Islami F, Kamangar F, Aghcheli K, et al. Epidemiologic features of upper gastrointestinal tract cancers in Northeastern Iran. Br J Cancer, 2004, 90(7): 1402-1406.
|
4. |
Akiyama Y, Iwaya T, Endo F, et al. Stability of cervical esophagogastrostomy via hand-sewn anastomosis after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Dis Esophagus, 2017, 30(5): 1-7.
|
5. |
Collard JM, Romagnoli R, Goncette L, et al. Terminalized semimechanical side-to-side suture technique for cervical esophagogastrostomy. Ann Thorac Surg, 1998, 65(3): 814-817.
|
6. |
Orringer MB, Marshall B, Iannettoni MD. Eliminating the cervical esophagogastric anastomotic leak with a side-to-side stapled anastomosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2000, 119(2): 277-288.
|
7. |
Kondra J, Ong SR, Clifton J, et al. A change in clinical practice: a partially stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis reduces morbidity and improves functional outcome after esophagectomy for cancer. Dis Esophagus, 2008, 21(5): 422-429.
|
8. |
Singhal S, Kailasam A, Akimoto S, et al. Simple technique of circular stapled anastomosis in Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2017, 27(3): 288-294.
|
9. |
Singh D, Maley RH, Santucci T, et al. Experience and technique of stapled mechanical cervical esophagogastric anastomosis. Ann Thorac Surg, 2001, 71(2): 419-424.
|
10. |
Noshiro H, Urata M, Ikeda O, et al. Triangulating stapling technique for esophagogastrostomy after minimally invasive esophagectomy. Surgery, 2013, 154(3): 604-610.
|
11. |
Behzadi A, Nichols FC, Cassivi SD, et al. Esophagogastrectomy: the influence of stapled versus hand-sewn anastomosis on outcome. J Gastrointest Surg, 2005, 9(8): 1031-1040.
|
12. |
Harustiak T, Pazdro A, Snajdauf M, et al. Anastomotic leak and stricture after hand-sewn versus linear-stapled intrathoracic oesophagogastric anastomosis: single-centre analysis of 415 oesophagectomies. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2016, 49(6): 1650-1659.
|
13. |
Price TN, Nichols FC, Harmsen WS, et al. A comprehensive review of anastomotic technique in 432 esophagectomies. Ann Thorac Surg, 2013, 95(4): 1154-1160.
|
14. |
Toh Y, Sakaguchi Y, Ikeda O, et al. The triangulating stapling technique for cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy. Surg Today, 2009, 39(3): 201-206.
|
15. |
Blackmon SH, Correa AM, Wynn B, et al. Propensity-matched analysis of three techniques for intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis. Ann Thorac Surg, 2007, 83(5): 1805-1813.
|
16. |
Liu QX, Qiu Y, Deng XF, et al. Comparison of outcomes following end-to-end hand-sewn and mechanical oesophagogastric anastomosis after oesophagectomy for carcinoma: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2015, 47(3): e118-e123.
|
17. |
Luechakiettisak P, Kasetsunthorn S. Comparison of hand-sewn and stapled in esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal cancer resection: a prospective randomized study. J Med Assoc Thai, 2008, 91(5): 681-685.
|
18. |
Zhang YS, Gao BR, Wang HJ, et al. Comparison of anastomotic leakage and stricture formation following layered and stapler oesophagogastric anastomosis for cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial. J Int Med Res, 2010, 38(1): 227-233.
|
19. |
Law S, Fok M, Chu KM, et al. Comparison of hand-sewn and stapled esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal resection for cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg, 1997, 226(2): 169-173.
|
20. |
Deng XF, Liu QX, Zhou D, et al. Hand-sewn vs linearly stapled esophagogastric anastomosis for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol, 2015, 21(15): 4757-4764.
|
21. |
Markar SR, Karthikesalingam A, Vyas S, et al. Hand-sewn versus stapled oesophago-gastric anastomosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gastrointest Surg, 2011, 15(5): 876-884.
|
22. |
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med, 2009, 6(7): e1000097.
|
23. |
Higgins JPT. Green S, eds. Cochrane Handbook for SystematicReviews of Interventions, version 5.1.0(updated March 2011).Cochrane Collaboration website. http://training.cochrane.org/handbook.2011. Accessed November 28, 2017.
|
24. |
Wang WP, Gao Q, Wang KN, et al. A prospective randomized controlled trial of semi-mechanical versus hand-sewn or circular stapled esophagogastrostomy for prevention of anastomotic stricture. World J Surg, 2013, 37(5): 1043-1050.
|
25. |
Saluja SS, Ray S, Pal S, et al. Randomized trial comparing side-to-side stapled and hand-sewn esophagogastric anastomosis in neck. J Gastrointest Surg, 2012, 16(7): 1287-1295.
|
26. |
Hao SG, Hou XB, Liu P, et al. Investigation and analysis on the life quality of patients by Collard cervical semi-mechanical esophagogastrostomy after esophagectomy. Chin J Cancer Prev Treat, 2015, 13(12): 1050-1054.
|
27. |
West of Scotland and Highland Anastomosis Study Group. Suturing or stapling in gastrointestinal surgery: A prospective randomized study. Br J Surg, 1991, 78(3): 337-341.
|
28. |
Valverde A, Hay JM, Fingerhut A, et al. Manual versus mechanical esophagogastric anastomosis after resection for carcinoma: a controlled trial. French Associations for Surgical Research. Surgery, 1996, 120(3): 476-483.
|
29. |
Craig SR, Walker WS, Cameron EW, et al. A prospective randomized study comparing stapled with handsewn oesophagogastric anastomoses. J R Coll Surg Edinb, 1996, 41(1): 17-19.
|
30. |
Laterza E, de' Manzoni G, Veraldi GF, et al. Manual compared with mechanical cervical oesophagogastric anastomosis: a randomised trial. Eur J Surg, 1999, 165(11): 1051-1054.
|
31. |
Walther B, Johansson J, Johnsson F, et al. Cervical or thoracic anastomosis after esophageal resection and gastric tube reconstruction: a prospective randomized trial comparing sutured neck anastomosis with stapled intrathoracic anastomosis. Ann Surg, 2003, 238(6): 803-812.
|
32. |
Hsu HH, Chen JS, Huang PM, et al. Comparison of manual and mechanical cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal resection for squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2004, 25(6): 1097-1101.
|
33. |
Okuyama M, Motoyama S, Suzuki H, et al. Hand-sewn cervical anastomosis versus stapled intrathoracic anastomosis after esophagectomy for middle or lower thoracic esophageal cancer: a prospective randomized controlled study. Surg Today, 2007, 37(11): 947-952.
|
34. |
Aquino JL, Camargo JG, Said MM, et al. Cervical esophagogastric anastomosis evaluation with a mechanical device versus manual suture in patients with advanced megaesophagus. Rev Col Bras Cir, 2009, 36(1): 19-23.
|
35. |
Ma RD, Zhang WT, Xu QR, et al. Esophagogastrostomy by side-to-side anastomosis in prevention of anastomotic stricture: a randomized clinical trial. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi, 2010, 48(8): 577-581.
|
36. |
Li JY, Wang Y, Liu WL, et al. Comparison between layered anastomosis and mechanical anastomosis of tubular stomach and cervical esophagus in esophagectomy. Chin J Clin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2017, 24(1): 61-64.
|
37. |
Castro PM, Ribeiro FP, Rocha Ade F, et al. Hand-sewn versus stapler esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal ressection: systematic review and meta-analysis. Arq Bras Cir Dig, 2014, 27(3): 216-221.
|
38. |
Honda M, Kuriyama A, Noma H, et al. Hand-sewn versus mechanical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg, 2013, 257(2): 238-248.
|