• Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Mianyang Centrol Hospital, Mianyang 621000, Sichuang Province, China;
PENGYong-hai, Email: seagull11@126.com
Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Objective To explore the clinical efficacy and experience of laparoscopic partial splenectomy. Methods The clinical data of 11 cases of splenic space occupying lesions in the author's hospital from January 2011 to May 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. Laparoscopic partial splenectomy were carried out in 11 patients. Results Eleven patients were successfully completed the laparoscopic partial resection of spleen. Operative timewas 2.0-3.5 h, the average operative time was (2.5±0.3) h. Intraoperative blood loss was 155-320 mL, the average blood loss was (200.3±55.1) mL. Eleven patients who ride smoothly, there was no case of pancreatic injury, gastrointestinal injury, major bleeding and other complications. Postoperative patients recovered well, 24 h after operation gastrointestinal function recovery, and can get out of bed activities. Silicone drainage tube placement time was 3-5 d, the average for placing time was (4.0±1.3) d. about 60-100 mL, the average (70.3±15.8) mL. The average length in hospital was 5-8 d, patients with an average of (6.3±1.5) d, all of the patients without postoperative complications such as infection, splenic infarction. Postoperative pathologic results suggested 6 cases were spleen hemangioma, 3 cases were pseudocyst of spleen, and 2 cases were true epithelial cyst. Conciusions  Laparoscopic partial spleen resection should fully grasp the operative indication, fully understand the pathological changes and the structure of door of the spleen, in earnest and patient, under the operation of laparoscopic spleen resection is safe, feasible, and the clinical curative effect is satisfied, worthy of clinical popularization and application.

Citation: HUZhao-hui, PENGYong-hai, CHENSi-rui. Application and Experience of Laparoscopic Partial Splenectomy: Report of 11 Cases. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BASES AND CLINICS IN GENERAL SURGERY, 2016, 23(4): 458-461. doi: 10.7507/1007-9424.20160121 Copy

  • Previous Article

    Correlation Analysis of Preoperative Nutritional Risk and Anastomotic Leakage Following Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer
  • Next Article

    The Contrastive Analysis of Two Kinds of Sigmoid Colostomy in Abdominal Perineal Resection