• Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, People’s Hospital of The Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi, Xinjiang 830001, P.R.China;
CHEN Xiong, Email: nhcx@123.com
Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of primary closure (PC) and T-tube drainage (TD) after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE). Methods The randomized controlled trials of PC and TD after LCBDE were retrieved from the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Science Citation Index Expanded until April 2015. All calculations and statistical tests were performed using ReviewerManager 5.2 software. Results Both of the two groups had no postoperative deaths within 30 days. The operative time and hospital stay of PC gourp were shorter than TD group statistically〔OR=–24.76, 95CI (–29.21, –20.31),P<0.000 01〕and〔OR=–2.68, 95%CI (–3.69, –1.67),P<0.000 01〕. The reoperative rate of PC group was lower than that of TD group, and the difference was statistically significant〔OR=0.20, 95%CI (0.05, 0.81),P=0.02〕. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the occurrence of postoperative severe complications〔OR=0.54, 95%CI (0.26, 1.12),P=0.10〕. Conclusions Compared with the TD group, the operative time and hospitalization time are shorer in PC group, and complication rate is similar, but the cost of treatment of the TD group is higher than PC group, so after LCBDE a primary closure of common bile duct is safe and effective method.

Citation: Baheti·KALIFU, GE Xiaohu, MENG Yuan, Yimamu·ABULA, CHEN Lunjian, MA Zhigang, XIONG Ju, CHEN Xiong. Primary closureversus T-tube drainage in laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: a meta-analysis . CHINESE JOURNAL OF BASES AND CLINICS IN GENERAL SURGERY, 2017, 24(4): 489-495. doi: 10.7507/1007-9424.201608024 Copy

  • Previous Article

    Endoscopic pneumatic dilationversus endoscopic stent placement in treatment of achalasia: a meta-analysis
  • Next Article

    损伤控制外科在严重腹部创伤中的临床应用