1. |
Ren S, Fan X, Ye Z, et al. Long-term outcomes of endovascular repair versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2012, 18(3): 222-227.
|
2. |
United Kingdom EVAR Trial Investigators; Greenhalgh RM, Brown LC, et al. Endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. N Engl J Med, 2010, 362(20): 1863-1871.
|
3. |
Weisbord SD, Palevsky PM. Radiocontrast-induced acute renal failure. J Intensive Care Med, 2005, 20(2): 63-75.
|
4. |
Lautin EM, Freeman NJ, Schoenfeld AH, et al. Radiocontrast-associated renal dysfunction: incidence and risk factors. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 1991, 157(1): 49-58.
|
5. |
von Segesser LK, Marty B, Ruchat P, et al. Routine use of intravascular ultrasound for endovascular aneurysm repair: angiography is not necessary. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2002, 23(6): 537-542.
|
6. |
Gahlen J, Hansmann J, Schumacher H, et al. Carbon dioxide angiography for endovascular grafting in high-risk patients with infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg, 2001, 33(3): 646-649.
|
7. |
Clevert DA, Kopp R. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for endovascular grafting in infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm in a single patient with risk factors for the use of iodinated contrast. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2008, 19(8): 1241-1245.
|
8. |
Kopp R, Zürn W, Weidenhagen R, et al. First experience using intraoperative contrast-enhanced ultrasound during endovascular aneurysm repair for infrarenal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg, 2010, 51(5): 1103-1110.
|
9. |
Sekiguchi H, Ajiro Y, Uchida Y, et al. Contrast-induced nephropathy and oxygen pretreatment in patients with impaired renal function. Kidney Int Rep, 2017, 3(1): 65-72.
|
10. |
Boucek P, Havrdova T, Oliyarnyk O, et al. Prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy in diabetic patients with impaired renal function: a randomized, double blind trial of sodium bicarbonate versus sodium chloride-based hydration. Diabetes Res Clin Pract, 2013, 101(3): 303-308.
|
11. |
Barrett BJ, Parfrey PS, Vavasour HM, et al. Contrast nephropathy in patients with impaired renal function: high versus low osmolar media. Kidney Int, 1992, 41(5): 1274-1279.
|
12. |
Park KW, Koo BK, Kim HL, et al. The incidence and predictors of contrast-induced nephropathy in adequately hydrated elderly patients with impaired renal function. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 2007, 22(6): 1794-1795.
|
13. |
Guo Q, Zhao J, Huang B, et al. A systematic review of ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging compared with computed tomography for endoleak detection and aneurysm diameter measurement after endovascular aneurysm repair. J Endovasc Ther, 2016, 23(6): 936-943.
|
14. |
Clevert DA, Minaifar N, Kopp R, et al. Imaging of endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) with contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). A pictorial comparison with CTA. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc, 2009, 41(3): 151-168.
|
15. |
van der Laan MJ, Bartels LW, Viergever MA, et al. Computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging of endoleaks after EVAR. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2006, 32(4): 361-365.
|
16. |
Chaikof EL, Dalman RL, Eskandari MK, et al. The Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines on the care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg, 2018, 67(1): 2-77.e2.
|
17. |
LeFevre ML, U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med, 2014, 161(4): 281-290.
|
18. |
Zucker EJ, Misono AS, Prabhakar AM. Abdominal aortic aneurysm screening practices: impact of the 2014 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendations. J Am Coll Radiol, 2017, 14(7): 868-874.
|
19. |
Glover MJ, Kim LG, Sweeting MJ, et al. Cost-effectiveness of the national health service abdominal aortic aneurysm screening programme in England. Br J Surg, 2014, 101(8): 976-982.
|
20. |
Davis M, Harris M, Earnshaw JJ. Implementation of the national health service abdominal aortic aneurysm screening program in England. J Vasc Surg, 2013, 57(5): 1440-1445.
|
21. |
Hager J, Länne T, Carlsson P, et al. Lower prevalence than expected when screening 70-year-old men for abdominal aortic aneurysm. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2013, 46(4): 453-459.
|
22. |
White RA. Endograft surveillance: a priority for long-term device performance. J Endovasc Ther, 2000, 7(6): 522.
|
23. |
Gilbert ES. Ionising radiation and cancer risks: what have we learned from epidemiology? Int J Radiat Biol, 2009, 85(6): 467-482.
|
24. |
Chaer RA, Gushchin A, Rhee R, et al. Duplex ultrasound as the sole long-term surveillance method post-endovascular aneurysm repair: a safe alternative for stable aneurysms. J Vasc Surg, 2009, 49(4): 845-850.
|
25. |
Iezzi R, Basilico R, Giancristofaro D, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus color duplex ultrasound imaging in the follow-up of patients after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg, 2009, 49(3): 552-560.
|