Value of preoperative simulation in the treatment of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt_CHINESE JOURNAL OF BASES AND CLINICS IN GENERAL SURGERY

Authors：

 WEI Xin , HU Hong , ZHONG Liming , YOU Jian

Department of Interventional Radiology, Nanchong Central Hospital, Second Clinic Institute of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan 637000, P. R. China;

Corresponding author：

WEI Xin, Email: wxzyy1998@sina.com

Keywords：

portal hypertension; transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt; three-dimensional reconstruction; simulation

DOI：

10.7507/1007-9424.201908053

Video：

Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Objective To evaluate the value of individualized preoperative simulation in transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS).Methods Thin slice scan data of 39 patients with supine upper abdomen were obtained, three dimensional structures of bone, liver, portal vein, inferior vena cava and hepatic vein in CT scan area were reconstructed in Mimics software. According to the size of interventional instruments, a virtual RUPS-100 puncture kit and an VIATORR stent were established in 3D MAX software. Computer simulations were performed to evaluate the route from the hepatic vein puncture portal vein and stent release position. The coincidence of simulation parameters with actual surgical results was compared.Results ① The time of preoperative simulation was controllable. The total simulation time was 70–110 minutes (after summing up the previous experience). Preoperative simulation in daily work would not affect the progress of treatment. ② There were 4 cases of puncturing bifurcation of portal vein, 22 cases of puncturing left branch and 13 cases of puncturing right branch during operation (24 cases of puncturing left branch and 15 cases of puncturing right branch by preoperative simulation plan). The overall coincidence rate was 89.7% (35/39). ③ Preoperative simulations were performed using 8 mm×6 cm/2 cm size VIATORR stents, and the stents used in the actual operation were the same as the simulation results. ④ Preoperative simulation and post-operative retrospective simulation could shortened the teaching and training time and enhanced the understanding of surgical intention and key steps.Conclusion Preoperative simulation based on patient's individualized three-dimensional model and virtual interventional device could guided the actual operation of TIPS more accurately, and had practical value for improving the success rate of operation and training young doctors.

Citation： WEI Xin, HU Hong, ZHONG Liming, YOU Jian. Value of preoperative simulation in the treatment of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BASES AND CLINICS IN GENERAL SURGERY, 2019, 26(12): 1424-1428. doi: 10.7507/1007-9424.201908053 Copy

1.	Fulton N, Buethe J, Gollamudi J, et al. Simulation-based training may improve resident skill in ultrasound-guided Biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2016, 207(6): 1329-1333.
2.	Powell DK, Jamison DK, Silberzweig JE. An endovascular simulation exercise among radiology residents: comparison of simulation performance with and without practice. Clin Imaging, 2015, 39(6): 1080-1085.
3.	Sun Z, Jansen S. Personalized 3D printed coronary models in coronary stenting. Quant Imaging Med Surg, 2019, 9(8): 1356-1367.
4.	Nayahangan LJ, Van Herzeele I, Konge L, et al. Achieving consensus to define Curricular content for simulation based education in vascular surgery: A Europe Wide Needs Assessment Initiative. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2019, 58(2): 284-291.
5.	匡铭, 汤地, 王晔, 等. 三维手术模拟系统在肝癌患者精准肝切除中的应用. 中国普外基础与临床杂志, 2011, 18(7): 682-687.
6.	Roguin A, Beyar R. Real case virtual reality training prior to carotid artery stenting. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2010, 75(2): 279-282.
7.	Maertens H, Vermassen F, Aggarwal R, et al. Endovascular training using a simulation based curriculum is less expensive than training in the hybrid angiosuite. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2018, 56(4): 583-590.
8.	魏欣, 钟立明, 谢晓东, 等. 虚拟血管内介入器械三维模型的建立及其临床价值. 中华放射学杂志, 2012, 46(4): 359-362.
9.	魏欣, 钟立明, 游箭, 等. 虚拟动脉及介入器械三维模型的建立及其临床价值. 实用放射学杂志, 2014, 30(6): 995-998.
10.	林科灿, 刘景丰, 曾金华, 等. 基于肝脏三维图像的肝段自动划分及虚拟解剖性肝切除. 中国普外基础与临床杂志, 2011, 18(7): 694-967.
11.	Chivot C, Robert B, Bouzerar R, et al. 3D C-Arm cone beam CT for targeting the portal vein during TIPS: Initial clinical experience. Eur J Radiol, 2018, 106(1): 20-25.
12.	David A, Liberge R, Meyer J, et al. Ultrasonographic guidance for portal vein access during transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement. Diagn Interv Imaging, 2019, 100(7): 445-453.
13.	Rossle M, Siegerstetter V, Euringer W, et al. The use of a polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent graft for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS): Long-term follow-up of 100 patients. Acta Radiol, 2006, 47(7): 660-666.
14.	Srinivasa RN, Srinivasa RN, Chick JFB, et al. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt reduction using the GORE VIATORR controlled expansion endoprosthesis: hemodynamics of reducing an established 10-mm TIPS to 8-mm in diameter. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 2018, 41(3): 518-521.
15.	Ferral H, Gomez-Reyes E, Fimmel CJ. Post-transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt follow-up and management in the VIATORR Era. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol, 2016, 19(1): 82-88.
16.	付焱, 张超, 杜恩辅, 等. 覆膜支架与裸支架 TIPS 比较治疗门脉高压症疗效的 Meta 分析. 中国循证医学杂志, 2018, 18(1): 35-42.
17.	韩国宏, 徐克. 规范经颈静脉肝内门体分流术, 推动多中心研究. 中华放射学杂志, 2017, 51(5): 321-323.
18.	Jomier J, Bullitt E, Van Horn M, et al. 3D/2D model-to-image registration applied to TIPS surgery. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv, 2006, 9(2): 662-669.
19.	Javan R, Zeman MN. A prototype educational model for hepatobiliary interventions: unveiling the role of graphic designers in medical 3D printing. J Digit Imaging, 2018, 31(1): 133-143.
20.	Ho H, Sorrell K, Peng L, et al. Hemodynamic analysis for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) in the liver based on a CT-image. IEEE Trans Med Imaging, 2013, 32(1): 92-98.
21.	Wang M, Zhou H, Huang Y, et al. Hydrodynamics Analysis and CFD Simulation of Portal Venous System by TIPS and LS. Hepatogastroenterology, 2015, 62(140): 1016-1022.
22.	孔祥雪, 聂兰英, 肖菊姣, 等. 新型肝脏管道模型的数字化制造研究. 中国临床解剖学杂, 2014, 32(3): 256-258.
23.	Fu R, Mahemut D, Tiyipujiang R, et al. Effect studies of Uyghur sand therapy on the hemodynamics of the knee-joint arteries. Biomed Mater Eng, 2014, 24(6): 2381-2388.
24.	张韬, 郭红斌, 李伟浩, 等. 基于个体化逆向工程和双向流固耦合模型的 B 型主动脉夹层数值模拟血流分析. 中华医学杂志, 2019, 99(2): 142-147.
25.	陈兰, 陈春林, 刘萍, 等. 基于磁共振成像的女性盆腔脏器数字化三维模型的构建. 妇产与遗传(电子版), 2019, 8(4): 17-21.

1. Fulton N, Buethe J, Gollamudi J, et al. Simulation-based training may improve resident skill in ultrasound-guided Biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2016, 207(6): 1329-1333.
2. Powell DK, Jamison DK, Silberzweig JE. An endovascular simulation exercise among radiology residents: comparison of simulation performance with and without practice. Clin Imaging, 2015, 39(6): 1080-1085.
3. Sun Z, Jansen S. Personalized 3D printed coronary models in coronary stenting. Quant Imaging Med Surg, 2019, 9(8): 1356-1367.
4. Nayahangan LJ, Van Herzeele I, Konge L, et al. Achieving consensus to define Curricular content for simulation based education in vascular surgery: A Europe Wide Needs Assessment Initiative. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2019, 58(2): 284-291.
5. 匡铭, 汤地, 王晔, 等. 三维手术模拟系统在肝癌患者精准肝切除中的应用. 中国普外基础与临床杂志, 2011, 18(7): 682-687.
6. Roguin A, Beyar R. Real case virtual reality training prior to carotid artery stenting. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2010, 75(2): 279-282.
7. Maertens H, Vermassen F, Aggarwal R, et al. Endovascular training using a simulation based curriculum is less expensive than training in the hybrid angiosuite. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2018, 56(4): 583-590.
8. 魏欣, 钟立明, 谢晓东, 等. 虚拟血管内介入器械三维模型的建立及其临床价值. 中华放射学杂志, 2012, 46(4): 359-362.
9. 魏欣, 钟立明, 游箭, 等. 虚拟动脉及介入器械三维模型的建立及其临床价值. 实用放射学杂志, 2014, 30(6): 995-998.
10. 林科灿, 刘景丰, 曾金华, 等. 基于肝脏三维图像的肝段自动划分及虚拟解剖性肝切除. 中国普外基础与临床杂志, 2011, 18(7): 694-967.
11. Chivot C, Robert B, Bouzerar R, et al. 3D C-Arm cone beam CT for targeting the portal vein during TIPS: Initial clinical experience. Eur J Radiol, 2018, 106(1): 20-25.
12. David A, Liberge R, Meyer J, et al. Ultrasonographic guidance for portal vein access during transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement. Diagn Interv Imaging, 2019, 100(7): 445-453.
13. Rossle M, Siegerstetter V, Euringer W, et al. The use of a polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent graft for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS): Long-term follow-up of 100 patients. Acta Radiol, 2006, 47(7): 660-666.
14. Srinivasa RN, Srinivasa RN, Chick JFB, et al. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt reduction using the GORE VIATORR controlled expansion endoprosthesis: hemodynamics of reducing an established 10-mm TIPS to 8-mm in diameter. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 2018, 41(3): 518-521.
15. Ferral H, Gomez-Reyes E, Fimmel CJ. Post-transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt follow-up and management in the VIATORR Era. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol, 2016, 19(1): 82-88.
16. 付焱, 张超, 杜恩辅, 等. 覆膜支架与裸支架 TIPS 比较治疗门脉高压症疗效的 Meta 分析. 中国循证医学杂志, 2018, 18(1): 35-42.
17. 韩国宏, 徐克. 规范经颈静脉肝内门体分流术, 推动多中心研究. 中华放射学杂志, 2017, 51(5): 321-323.
18. Jomier J, Bullitt E, Van Horn M, et al. 3D/2D model-to-image registration applied to TIPS surgery. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv, 2006, 9(2): 662-669.
19. Javan R, Zeman MN. A prototype educational model for hepatobiliary interventions: unveiling the role of graphic designers in medical 3D printing. J Digit Imaging, 2018, 31(1): 133-143.
20. Ho H, Sorrell K, Peng L, et al. Hemodynamic analysis for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) in the liver based on a CT-image. IEEE Trans Med Imaging, 2013, 32(1): 92-98.
21. Wang M, Zhou H, Huang Y, et al. Hydrodynamics Analysis and CFD Simulation of Portal Venous System by TIPS and LS. Hepatogastroenterology, 2015, 62(140): 1016-1022.
22. 孔祥雪, 聂兰英, 肖菊姣, 等. 新型肝脏管道模型的数字化制造研究. 中国临床解剖学杂, 2014, 32(3): 256-258.
23. Fu R, Mahemut D, Tiyipujiang R, et al. Effect studies of Uyghur sand therapy on the hemodynamics of the knee-joint arteries. Biomed Mater Eng, 2014, 24(6): 2381-2388.
24. 张韬, 郭红斌, 李伟浩, 等. 基于个体化逆向工程和双向流固耦合模型的 B 型主动脉夹层数值模拟血流分析. 中华医学杂志, 2019, 99(2): 142-147.
25. 陈兰, 陈春林, 刘萍, 等. 基于磁共振成像的女性盆腔脏器数字化三维模型的构建. 妇产与遗传(电子版), 2019, 8(4): 17-21.

Previous Article
Explore the sweeping strategy of cervical lymph node metastasis in papillary thyroid carcinoma once again
Next Article
Risk factors and bleeding points for hemorrhage after thyroidectomy

CHINESE JOURNAL OF BASES AND CLINICS IN GENERAL SURGERY

Value of preoperative simulation in the treatment of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Previous Article

Next Article

Format

Content