1. |
Pulvirenti A, Ramera M, Bassi C. Modifications in the International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition of postoperative pancreatic fistula. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2017, 2: 107.
|
2. |
Van Buren G, Bloomston M, Hughes SJ, et al. A randomized prospective multicenter trial of pancreaticoduodenectomy with and without routine intraperitoneal drainage. Ann Surg, 2014, 259(4): 605-612.
|
3. |
Darnis B, Lebeau R, Chopin-Laly X, et al. Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): predictors and management from a prospective database. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2013, 398(3): 441-448.
|
4. |
Kang JS, Park T, Han Y, et al. Clinical validation of scoring systems of postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy: applicability to Eastern cohorts? Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr, 2019, 8(3): 211-218.
|
5. |
Shinde RS, Acharya R, Chaudhari VA, et al. External validation and comparison of the original, alternative and updated-alternative fistula risk scores for the prediction of postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy. Pancreatology, 2020, 20(4): 751-756.
|
6. |
Hayashi H, Amaya K, Fujiwara Y, et al. Comparison of three fistula risk scores after pancreatoduodenectomy: A single-institution retrospective study. Asian J Surg, 2021, 44(1): 143-146.
|
7. |
Huang XT, Huang CS, Liu C, et al. Development and validation of a new nomogram for predicting clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy. World J Surg, 2021, 45(1): 261-269.
|
8. |
Liu R, Cai Y, Cai H, et al. Dynamic prediction for clinically relevant pancreatic fistula: a novel prediction model for laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. BMC Surg, 2021, 21(1): 7.
|
9. |
Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C, et al. The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 Years After. Surgery, 2017, 161(3): 584-591.
|
10. |
Benchoufi M, Matzner-Lober E, Molinari N, et al. Interobserver agreement issues in radiology. Diagn Interv Imaging, 2020, 101(10): 639-641.
|
11. |
Adderley NJ, Mallett S, Marshall T, et al. Temporal and external validation of a prediction model for adverse outcomes among inpatients with diabetes. Diabet Med, 2018, 35(6): 798-806.
|
12. |
Mungroop TH, van Rijssen LB, van Klaveren D, et al. Alternative fistula risk score for pancreatoduodenectomy (a-FRS): design and international external validation. Ann Surg, 2019, 269(5): 937-943.
|
13. |
Callery MP, Pratt WB, Kent TS, et al. A prospectively validated clinical risk score accurately predicts pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy. J Am Coll Surg, 2013, 216(1): 1-14.
|
14. |
Mungroop TH, Klompmaker S, Wellner UF, et al. Updated alternative fistula risk score (ua-FRS) to include minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy: Pan-European Validation. Ann Surg, 2021, 273(2): 334-340.
|
15. |
Aoki S, Miyata H, Konno H, et al. Risk factors of serious postoperative complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy and risk calculators for predicting postoperative complications: a nationwide study of 17, 564 patients in Japan. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, 2017, 24(5): 243-251.
|
16. |
Al Abbas AI, Borrebach JD, Pitt HA, et al. Development of a novel pancreatoduodenectomy-specific risk calculator: an analysis of 10 000 patients. J Gastrointest Surg, 2021, 25(6): 1503-1511.
|
17. |
Hirono S, Shimokawa T, Nagakawa Y, et al. Risk factors for pancreatic fistula grade C after pancreatoduodenectomy: A large prospective, multicenter Japan-Taiwan collaboration study. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, 2020, 27(9): 622-631.
|
18. |
Xia W, Zhou Y, Lin Y, et al. A predictive risk scoring system for clinically relevant pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Med Sci Monit, 2018, 24: 5719-5728.
|
19. |
Kamarajah SK, Bundred JR, Lin A, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of factors associated with post-operative pancreatic fistula following pancreatoduodenectomy. ANZ J Surg, 2021, 91(5): 810-821.
|
20. |
Liu R, Li M, Liu ZP, et al. Identifying critical transitions and their leading biomolecular networks in complex diseases. Sci Rep, 2012, 2: 813.
|
21. |
Yang B, Li M, Tang W, et al. Dynamic network biomarker indicates pulmonary metastasis at the tipping point of hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat Commun, 2018, 9(1): 678.
|
22. |
Li T, D’Cruz RT, Lim SY, et al. Somatostatin analogues and the risk of post-operative pancreatic fistulas after pancreatic resection—A systematic review & meta-analysis. Pancreatology, 2020, 20(2): 158-168.
|
23. |
Dalton EC, Johns MS, Rhodes L, et al. Meta-analysis on the effect of pasireotide for prevention of postoperative pancreatic fistula. Am Surg, 2020, 86(12): 1728-1735.
|
24. |
Laaninen M, Sand J, Nordback I, et al. Perioperative hydrocortisone reduces major complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg, 2016, 264(5): 696-702.
|
25. |
Adachi T, Ono S, Matsushima H, et al. Efficacy of triple-drug therapy to prevent pancreatic fistulas in patients with high drain amylase levels after pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Surg Res, 2019, 234: 77-83.
|
26. |
Liu Y, Li Y, Wang L, et al. Predictive value of drain pancreatic amylase concentration for postoperative pancreatic fistula on postoperative day 1 after pancreatic resection: An updated meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore), 2018, 97(38): e12487.
|
27. |
Maggino L, Malleo G, Bassi C, et al. Identification of an optimal cut-off for drain fluid amylase on postoperative day 1 for predicting clinically relevant fistula after distal pancreatectomy: A multi-institutional analysis and external validation. Ann Surg, 2019, 269(2): 337-343.
|
28. |
Linnemann RJA, Patijn GA, van Rijssen LB, et al. The role of abdominal drainage in pancreatic resection—A multicenter validation study for early drain removal. Pancreatology, 2019, 19(6): 888-896.
|
29. |
Lee SR, Kim HO, Shin JH. Significance of drain fluid amylase check on day 3 after pancreatectomy. ANZ J Surg, 2019, 89(5): 497-502.
|