1. |
刘明. 护理质性研究. 北京:人民卫生出版社, 2008:1-22.
|
2. |
陈向明. 质性研究方法与社会科学研究. 北京:教育科学出版社. 2000:12.
|
3. |
王新田, 候婕, 杨克虎. 护理质性研究对循证护理的影响探讨. 护理学报, 2011, 5:46-48.
|
4. |
李泽楷. 护理学研究生质性研究能力培养的必要性及课程设置. 中华护理教育, 2012, 9(2):65-66.
|
5. |
刘巍, 刘玉锦. 量性研究和质性研究在护理研究中的综合运用. 吉林医学, 2008, 29(14):1147-1148.
|
6. |
胡雁. 循证护理学. 北京:人民卫生出版社, 2012:88-89.
|
7. |
IOM (Institute of Medicine). Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust. Washington, DC:The National Academies Press, 2011.
|
8. |
Guba, EG. The Paradigm Dialog. London:Newbury Park, CA:Sage Publications, 1990.
|
9. |
Public Health Resource Unit. (2006). Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP). England Public Health Resource Unit. Available at:http://www.casp-uk.net/#!casp-tools-checklists/.
|
10. |
Dixon-Woods M, Shaw RL, Agarwal S, et al. The problem of appraising qualitative research. Qual Saf Health Care, 2004, 13(3): 223-225.
|
11. |
Knowles SE, Toms G, Sanders C, et al. Qualitative Meta-Synthesis of User Experience of Computerised Therapy for Depression and Anxiety. Harris F, ed. PLoS ONE, 2014, 9(1):e84323.
|
12. |
Toye F, Seers K, Allcock N, et al. Meta-ethnography 25 years on: challenges and insights for synthesising a large number of qualitative studies. BMC Med Res Methodol, 2014, 14:80.
|
13. |
Allison Tong. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ):a 32-itm checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care, 2007, 19(6):349-357.
|
14. |
Prorok JC, Horgan S, Seitz DP. Health care experiences of people with dementia and their caregivers:a meta-ethnographic analysis of qualitative studies. CMAJ. 2013, 185(14):E669-E680.
|
15. |
费宇彤, 刘建平, 于河, 等. 报告质性研究个体访谈和焦点组访谈统一标准的介绍. 中西医结合学报, 2008, 6(2):115-118.
|
16. |
王媛媛, 靳英辉,陈兴, 等. 2004-2013年国内护理领域个体和焦点小组访谈研究论文的报告学质量评价. 中国实用护理杂志, 2015, 31(2):113-118.
|
17. |
袁浩斌. 循证护理中质性研究的Meta-整合方法. 护理学杂志, 2012, 27(21):67-69.
|
18. |
Walsh D, Downe S. Meta-synthesis method for qualitative research: a literature review. J Adv Nurs, 2005, 50(2):204-211.
|
19. |
Pearson A. Balancing the evidence:incorporating the synthesis of qualitative data into systematic reviews. JBI Reports, 2004, 2(2):45-64.
|
20. |
The Joanna Briggs Institute:Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers' Manual. Adelaide:The Joanna Briggs Institute, 2011.
|
21. |
Prorok JC, Horgan S, Seitz DP. Health care experiences of people with dementia and their caregivers:a meta-ethnographic analysis of qualitative studies. CMAJ, 2013, 185(14):E669-E680.
|
22. |
Sandelowski M, Barroso J. Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. New York:Springer, 2007.
|
23. |
Noblit GW, Hare RD. Meta-ethnography:Synthesizing qualitative studies. London:Newbury Park, CA:Sage Publications, 1988.
|
24. |
Galdas P, Darwin Z, Kidd L, et al. The accessibility and acceptability of self-management support interventions for men with long term conditions:a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies. BMC Public Health, 2014, 14:1230.
|
25. |
May CR, Masters J, Welch L, et al. EXPERTS 1-experiences of long-term life-limiting conditions among patients and carers: protocol for a qualitative meta-synthesis and conceptual modelling study. BMJ Open, 2015, 5(4):e007372.
|
26. |
Hannes K, Macaitis K. A move to more systematic and transparent approaches in qualitative evidence synthesis:update on a review of published papers. Qual Res, 2012, 12(4):402-442.
|
27. |
Campbell R, Pound P, Morgan M, et al. Evaluating metaethnography:Systematic analysis and synthesis of qualitative research. Health Technol Assess, 2011, 15(43):1-164.
|
28. |
Trevillion K, Hughes B, Feder G, et al. Disclosure of domestic violence in mental health settings:A qualitative meta-synthesis. Int Rev Psychiatry, 2014, 26(4):430-444.
|
29. |
Atkins S, Lewin S, Smith H, et al. Conducting a meta-ethnography of qualitative literature:Lessons learnt. BMC Med Res Methodol, 2008, 8:21.
|
30. |
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. What is "quality of evidence" and why is it important to clinicians? BMJ, 2008, 336(7651):995-998.
|
31. |
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, et al. GRADE:证据质量和推荐强度分级的共识. 中国循证医学杂志, 2009, 9(10):8-11.
|
32. |
Atkins D, Best D, Briss PA, et al. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ, 2004, 328(7454):1490.
|
33. |
Lewin S, Glenton C, Noyes J, et al. CerQual approach:Assessing how much certainty to place in findings from qualitative evidence syntheses. Quebec, Canada:21st Cochrane Colloquium, 2013.
|
34. |
Macaitis K. The systematic review of evidence generated by qualitative research, narrative and text. Adelaide:The Joanna Briggs Institute, 2009.
|
35. |
Munn Z, Porritt K, Lockwood C, et al. Establishing confidence in the output of qualitative research synthesis:the ConQual approach. BMC Med Res Methodol, 2014, 14:108.
|