1. |
Jansen JP, Fleurence R, Devine B, et al. Interpreting indirect treatment comparisons and network meta-analysis for health-care decision making: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: part 1. Value Health, 2011, 14(4): 417-428.
|
2. |
Jansen JP, Trikalinos T, Cappelleri JC, et al. Indirecttreatment comparison/network meta-analysis study questionnaire to assess relevanceand credibility to inform health care decision making: an ISPOR-AMCP-NPC Good PracticeTask Force report. Value Health, 2014, 17(2): 157-173.
|
3. |
陈耀龙, 姚亮, 杜亮, 等. GRADE 在系统评价中应用的必要性及注意事项. 中国循证医学杂志, 2013, 13(12): 1401-1404.
|
4. |
陈耀龙, 姚亮, 杜亮, 等. GRADE在诊断准确性试验系统评价中应用的原理、方法、挑战及发展趋势. 中国循证医学杂志, 2014, 14(11): 1402-1406.
|
5. |
姚亮, 陈耀龙, 杜亮, 等. GRADE在诊断试验系统评价中应用的实例解读. 中国循证医学杂志, 2014, 2014, 14(11): 1407-1412.
|
6. |
Puhan MA, Schünemann HJ, et al. A GRADE Working Group approach for rating the quality of treatment effect estimates from network meta-analysis. BMJ, 2014.
|
7. |
Salanti G, Del Giovane C, Chaimani A, et al. Evaluating the quality of evidence from a network meta-analysis. PLoS One, 2014, 9(7): e99682.
|
8. |
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence——indirectness. J Clin Epidemiol, 2011, 64(12): 1303-1310.
|
9. |
Balshem H, Helfand M, Schünemann HJ, et al. GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol, 2011, 64(4): 401-406.
|
10. |
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Schünemann HJ, et al. GRADE guidelines: a new series of articles in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. J Clin Epidemiol, 2011, 64(4): 380-382.
|
11. |
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist G, et al. GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence——study limitations (risk of bias). J Clin Epidemiol, 2011, 64(4): 407-415.
|
12. |
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence——inconsistency. J Clin Epidemiol, 2011, 64(12): 1294-1302.
|
13. |
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence——imprecision. J Clin Epidemiol, 2011, 64(12): 1283-1293.
|
14. |
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Montori V, et al. GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence——publication bias. J Clin Epidemiol, 2011, 64(12): 1277-1282.
|
15. |
van Enst WA1, Ochodo E, Scholten RJ, et al. Investigation of publication bias in meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy: a meta-epidemiological study. BMC Med Res Methodol, 2014, 14(1): 70.
|
16. |
Begg CB, Mazumdar M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics, 1994: 1088-1101.
|
17. |
Egger M, Smith GD, Schneider M, et al. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ, 1997, 315(109): 629-634.
|
18. |
Iorio A, Spencer FA, Falavigna M, et al. Use of GRADE for assessment of evidence about prognosis: rating confidence in estimates of event rates in broad categories of patients. BMJ, 2015, 350: h870.
|
19. |
Murad MH, Drake MT, Mullan RJ, et al. Clinical review. Comparative effectiveness of drug treatments to prevent fragility fractures: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2012, 97(6): 1871-1880.
|
20. |
Altman D G, Song F, Sakarovitch C, et al. Indirect comparisons of competing interventions. Gray Publishing, 2005.
|
21. |
Dias S, Welton NJ, Caldwell DM, Ades AE. Checking consistency in mixed treatmentcomparison meta-analysis. Stat Med, 2010, 29(7-8): 932-944.
|
22. |
Kessels A, ter Riet G, Puhan M, et al. A simple regression model for network meta-analysis. OA Epidemiology, 2013, 1(1): 7.
|
23. |
Higgins JPT, Jackson D, Barrett JK, et al. Consistency and inconsistency in network meta-analysis: concepts and models for multi-arm studies. Res Synth Methods, 2012, 3(2): 98-110.
|
24. |
张超, 鄢金柱, 孙凤, 等. 网状 Meta 分析一致性的鉴别与处理方法. 中国循证医学杂志, 2014, 14(7): 884-888.
|
25. |
Avenell A, Mak JCS, O'Connell D. Vitamin D and vitamin D analogues for preventing fractures in post-menopausal women and older men. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2014, 4: CD000227.
|
26. |
Sutton A, Ades AE, Cooper N, et al. Use of indirect and mixed treatment comparisons for technology assessment. Pharmacoeconomics, 2008, 26(9): 753-767.
|
27. |
Madan J, Stevenson MD, Cooper KL, et al. Consistency between direct and indirect trial evidence: is direct evidence always more reliable? Value Health, 2011, 14(6): 953-960.
|
28. |
Sturtz S, Bender R. Unsolved issues of mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis: network size and inconsistency. Res Synth Methods, 2012, 3(4): 300-311.
|
29. |
Song F, Clark A, Bachmann M, Maas J. Simulation evaluation of statistical properties of methods for indirect and mixed treatment comparisons. BMC Med Res Methodol, 2012, 12(1): 138.
|
30. |
Mills E, Bansback N, Ghement I, et al. Multiple treatment comparison meta-analyses: a step forward into complexity. Clin Epidemiol, 2011, 3: 193-202.
|
31. |
Dias S, Welton NJ, Ades AE. Study designs to detect sponsorship and other biases in systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol, 2010, 63(6): 587-588.
|
32. |
Piepho HP. Network-meta analysis made easy: Detection of inconsistency using factorial analysis-of-variance models. BMC Med Res Methodol, 2014, 14(1): 61.
|
33. |
Cipriani A, Higgins JPT, Geddes JR, et al. Conceptual and technical challenges in network meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med, 2013, 159(2): 130-137.
|
34. |
Hoaglin DC, Hawkins N, Jansen JP, et al. Conducting indirect-treatment-comparison and network-meta-analysis studies: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: part 2. Value Health, 2011, 14(4): 429-437.
|
35. |
Hutton B, Salanti G, Chaimani A, et al. The qualityof reporting methods and results in network meta-analyses: an overview of reviews andsuggestions for improvement. PLoS One, 2014, 9(3): e92508.
|
36. |
Stettler C, Wandel S, Allemann S, et al. Outcomes associated with drug-eluting and bare-metal stents: a collaborative network meta-analysis. Lancet, 2007, 370(9591): 937-948.
|
37. |
Palmerini T, Biondi-Zoccai G, Riva DD, et al. Risk of stroke with percutaneous coronary intervention compared with on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery: Evidence from a comprehensive network meta-analysis. Am Heart J, 2013, 165(6): 910-917.
|
38. |
Pandor A, Gomersall T, Stevens JW, et al. Remote monitoring after recent hospital discharge in patients with heart failure: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Heart, 2013, 99(23): 1717-1726.
|
39. |
Windecker S, Stortecky S, Stefanini GG, et al. Revascularisation versus medical treatment in patients with stable coronary artery disease: network meta-analysis. BMJ, 2014, 348: g3859.
|
40. |
Mustafa RA, Santesso N, Brozek J, et al. The GRADE approach is reproducible in assessing the quality of evidence of quantitative evidence syntheses. J Clin Epidemiol, 2013, 66(7): 736-742.
|
41. |
田金徽, 陈耀龙, 杨克虎, 等. SR/MA研究进展与挑战. 兰州大学学报(医学版). 2016, 42(1): 42-47.
|