Evaluation of reliability and validity on quality criteria for clinical nursing practice guidelines in China_Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

Authors：

ZHOU Yingfeng ¹ ,  WANG Qiang ² ,  HU Yan ¹ , XING Weijie ¹ , ZHANG Mengxing ¹ , ZHONG Jie ¹ , FU Liang ¹

1. School of Nursing, Fudan University; University Centre for Evidence-based Nursing: A Joanna Briggs Institute Centre of Excellence, Shanghai Evidence-based Nursing Center, Shanghai, 200032, P.R.China;
2. National Center for Medical Service Administration, National Health Commission, Beijing, 100044, P.R.China;

Corresponding author：

WANG Qiang, Email: jason2019@sina.cn; HU Yan, Email: huyan@fudan.edu.cn

Keywords：

Clinical practice guideline; Evidence-based nursing; Quality criteria; Reliability and validity

DOI：

10.7507/1672-2531.201807027

Video：

Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Objectives To evaluate the reliability and validity on quality criteria for clinical nursing practice guidelines.Methods Five appraisers were included to assess two clinical nursing practice guidelines using the quality criteria for clinical nursing practice guidelines and AGREE Ⅱ. ICC and coefficient of consistency were adopted to assess the reliability and validity of the appraisal tools.Results ICC for two guidelines of AIDS and infusion by the quality criteria for clinical nursing practice guidelines were 0.979 and 0.890. ICC for two guidelines of AIDS and infusion by AGREE Ⅱ were 0.957 and 0.887. The coefficient of consistency for guidelines of AIDS and infusion by the two appraisal tools were 0.880 and 0.886, both were highly consistent.Conclusions The quality criteria for clinical nursing practice guidelines has good reliability and validity and can be used as appraisal tool for quality evaluation of clinical nursing practice guidelines. It is strongly recommended that the users should understand the appraisal tool or should be trained to decrease the bias.

Citation： ZHOU Yingfeng, WANG Qiang, HU Yan, XING Weijie, ZHANG Mengxing, ZHONG Jie, FU Liang. Evaluation of reliability and validity on quality criteria for clinical nursing practice guidelines in China. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2019, 19(1): 84-88. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.201807027 Copy

1.	王小钦, 王吉耀. 循证临床实践指南的制定与实施. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2016.1-50.
2.	Available at: https://www.g-i-n.net/library/international-guidelines-library.
3.	IOM. Clinical practice guidelines we can trust. Washington DC. The national Academies Press, 2011.
4.	Grimshaw JM, Russell IT. Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations. Lancet, 1993, 342(8883): 1317-1322.
5.	Lannone P, Montano N, Minardi M, et al. Wrong guidelines: why and how often they occur. Evid Based Med, 2017, 22(1): 1-3.
6.	李楠, 姚亮, 吴琼芳, 等. 2012~2013 年中国大陆期刊发表临床实践指南质量评价. 中国循证医学杂志, 2013, 13(6): 621-623.
7.	王琪. 中国临床实践指南质量评价研究. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2017.
8.	上海市公卫卫生临床中心, 复旦大学 JBI 循证护理合作中心. 艾滋病临床护理实践指南. 2014.
9.	Infusion nurses society. Infusion therapy standards of practice. J Infus Nurs, 2016, 39(1S): S1-S113.
10.	王吉耀, 王强, 王小钦, 等. 中国临床实践指南评价体系的制定与初步验证. 中华医学杂志, 2018, 98(20): 1544-1548.
11.	周英凤, 王强, 胡雁, 等. 中国护理领域临床实践指南质量评价标准的构建. 中国循证医学杂志, 2018, 18(9): 1-5.
12.	Brouwers MC, Kho ME, Browman GP, et al. The global rating scale complements the AGREE II in advancing the quality of practice guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol, 2012, 65(5): 526-534.
13.	方积乾, 陆盈. 现代医学统计学. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2002: 80-87.
14.	马斌荣. 医学科研中的统计方法. 北京: 北京科学出版社, 2005: 3.
15.	陈耀龙, 杨克虎, 田金徽, 等. 循证实践指南的制定: 国际经验与中国实践. 兰州大学学报 (医学版), 2016, 42(1): 29-35.
16.	Siering U, Eikermann M, Hausner E, et al. Appraisal tools for clinical practice guideline: a systematic review. PLoS one, 2013, 8(12): e 82915.
17.	张悦, 张士靖, 周志超, 等. 国际临床指南评价工具的发展与启示. 中华医学图书情报杂志, 2015, 24(1): 11-16.
18.	胡雁, 郝玉芳. 循证护理学. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2018: 216.

1. 王小钦, 王吉耀. 循证临床实践指南的制定与实施. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2016.1-50.
2. Available at: https://www.g-i-n.net/library/international-guidelines-library.
3. IOM. Clinical practice guidelines we can trust. Washington DC. The national Academies Press, 2011.
4. Grimshaw JM, Russell IT. Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations. Lancet, 1993, 342(8883): 1317-1322.
5. Lannone P, Montano N, Minardi M, et al. Wrong guidelines: why and how often they occur. Evid Based Med, 2017, 22(1): 1-3.
6. 李楠, 姚亮, 吴琼芳, 等. 2012~2013 年中国大陆期刊发表临床实践指南质量评价. 中国循证医学杂志, 2013, 13(6): 621-623.
7. 王琪. 中国临床实践指南质量评价研究. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2017.
8. 上海市公卫卫生临床中心, 复旦大学 JBI 循证护理合作中心. 艾滋病临床护理实践指南. 2014.
9. Infusion nurses society. Infusion therapy standards of practice. J Infus Nurs, 2016, 39(1S): S1-S113.
10. 王吉耀, 王强, 王小钦, 等. 中国临床实践指南评价体系的制定与初步验证. 中华医学杂志, 2018, 98(20): 1544-1548.
11. 周英凤, 王强, 胡雁, 等. 中国护理领域临床实践指南质量评价标准的构建. 中国循证医学杂志, 2018, 18(9): 1-5.
12. Brouwers MC, Kho ME, Browman GP, et al. The global rating scale complements the AGREE II in advancing the quality of practice guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol, 2012, 65(5): 526-534.
13. 方积乾, 陆盈. 现代医学统计学. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2002: 80-87.
14. 马斌荣. 医学科研中的统计方法. 北京: 北京科学出版社, 2005: 3.
15. 陈耀龙, 杨克虎, 田金徽, 等. 循证实践指南的制定: 国际经验与中国实践. 兰州大学学报 (医学版), 2016, 42(1): 29-35.
16. Siering U, Eikermann M, Hausner E, et al. Appraisal tools for clinical practice guideline: a systematic review. PLoS one, 2013, 8(12): e 82915.
17. 张悦, 张士靖, 周志超, 等. 国际临床指南评价工具的发展与启示. 中华医学图书情报杂志, 2015, 24(1): 11-16.
18. 胡雁, 郝玉芳. 循证护理学. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2018: 216.

Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

Evaluation of reliability and validity on quality criteria for clinical nursing practice guidelines in China

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Previous Article

Next Article

Format

Content