Interpretation of standards for reporting implementation studies (StaRI)_Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

Authors：

XING Weijie ^1,2 , ZHU Zheng ^1,2 ,  HU Yan ^1,2 , ZHOU Yingfeng ^1,2 , GU Ying ^2,3

1. School of Nursing, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, P.R.China;
2. Fudan University Centre for Evidence-based Nursing: A Joanna Briggs Institute Centre of Excellence, Shanghai, 200032, P.R.China;
3. Children’s Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 201102, P.R.China;

Corresponding author：

HU Yan, Email: huyan@fudan.edu.cn

Keywords：

Implementation science; Implementation studies; Reporting guideline; Interpretation

DOI：

10.7507/1672-2531.201808102

Video：

Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

To standardize and improve the reporting quality of implementation studies, BMJ published the standards for reporting implementation studies (StaRI). This paper introduces the background and process of StaRI development, and interprets the core content of StaRI. It is expected that StaRI will provide support for domestic researchers to carry out implementation studies and writing implementation research reports.

Citation： XING Weijie, ZHU Zheng, HU Yan, ZHOU Yingfeng, GU Ying. Interpretation of standards for reporting implementation studies (StaRI). Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2019, 19(1): 97-101. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.201808102 Copy

1.	Peters DH, Adam T, Alonge O, et al. Implementation research: what it is and how to do it. BMJ, 2013, 347: f6753.
2.	Eccles MP, Mittman BS. Welcome to implementation science. Implement Sci, 2006, 1(1): 1.
3.	Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, et al. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci, 2009, 4(15): 50.
4.	Bauer MS, Damschroder L, Hagedorn H, et al. An introduction to implementation science for the non-specialist. BMC Psychol, 2015, 3: 32.
5.	Implementation research in health: a practical guide. Available at: http://www.who.int/alliance-hpsr/resources/implementationresearchguide/en/.
6.	Rycroft-Malone J, Burton CR. Is it time for standards for reporting on research about implementation? Worldviews Evid Based Nurs, 2011, 8(4): 189-190.
7.	Pinnock H, Barwick M, Carpenter CR, et al. Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies (StaRI) statement. BMJ, 2017, 356: i6795.
8.	Moher D, Schulz KF, Simera I, et al. Guidance for developers of health research reporting guidelines. PLoS Med, 2010, 7(2): e1000217.
9.	Pinnock H, Barwick M, Carpenter CR, et al. Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies (StaRI): explanation and elaboration document. BMJ Open, 2017, 7(4): e013318.
10.	Emond YE, Calsbeek H, Teerenstra S, et al. Improving the implementation of perioperative safety guidelines using a multifaceted intervention approach: protocol of the IMPROVE study, a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial. Implement Sci, 2015, 10: 3.
11.	van Dijk-de Vries A, van Bokhoven MA, Terluin B, et al. Integrating nurse-led Self-Management Support (SMS) in routine primary care: design of a hybrid effectiveness-implementation study among type 2 diabetes patients with problems of daily functioning and emotional distress: a study protocol. BMC Fam Pract, 2013, 14: 77.
12.	Pinnock H, Epiphaniou E, Pearce G, et al. Implementing supported self-management for asthma: a systematic review and suggested hierarchy of evidence of implementation studies. BMC Med, 2015, 13: 127.
13.	Campbell MK, Piaggio G, Elbourne DR, et al. Consort 2010 statement: extension to cluster randomised trials. BMJ, 2012, 345: e5661.
14.	Zwarenstein M, Treweek S, Gagnier JJ, et al. Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement. BMJ, 2008, 337: a2390.
15.	von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol, 2008, 61(4): 344-349.
16.	Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care, 2007, 19(6): 349-357.
17.	钟婕, 周英凤. 实施性研究的概述及应用进展. 中华护理杂志, 2018, 53(7): 875-879.

1. Peters DH, Adam T, Alonge O, et al. Implementation research: what it is and how to do it. BMJ, 2013, 347: f6753.
2. Eccles MP, Mittman BS. Welcome to implementation science. Implement Sci, 2006, 1(1): 1.
3. Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, et al. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci, 2009, 4(15): 50.
4. Bauer MS, Damschroder L, Hagedorn H, et al. An introduction to implementation science for the non-specialist. BMC Psychol, 2015, 3: 32.
5. Implementation research in health: a practical guide. Available at: http://www.who.int/alliance-hpsr/resources/implementationresearchguide/en/.
6. Rycroft-Malone J, Burton CR. Is it time for standards for reporting on research about implementation? Worldviews Evid Based Nurs, 2011, 8(4): 189-190.
7. Pinnock H, Barwick M, Carpenter CR, et al. Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies (StaRI) statement. BMJ, 2017, 356: i6795.
8. Moher D, Schulz KF, Simera I, et al. Guidance for developers of health research reporting guidelines. PLoS Med, 2010, 7(2): e1000217.
9. Pinnock H, Barwick M, Carpenter CR, et al. Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies (StaRI): explanation and elaboration document. BMJ Open, 2017, 7(4): e013318.
10. Emond YE, Calsbeek H, Teerenstra S, et al. Improving the implementation of perioperative safety guidelines using a multifaceted intervention approach: protocol of the IMPROVE study, a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial. Implement Sci, 2015, 10: 3.
11. van Dijk-de Vries A, van Bokhoven MA, Terluin B, et al. Integrating nurse-led Self-Management Support (SMS) in routine primary care: design of a hybrid effectiveness-implementation study among type 2 diabetes patients with problems of daily functioning and emotional distress: a study protocol. BMC Fam Pract, 2013, 14: 77.
12. Pinnock H, Epiphaniou E, Pearce G, et al. Implementing supported self-management for asthma: a systematic review and suggested hierarchy of evidence of implementation studies. BMC Med, 2015, 13: 127.
13. Campbell MK, Piaggio G, Elbourne DR, et al. Consort 2010 statement: extension to cluster randomised trials. BMJ, 2012, 345: e5661.
14. Zwarenstein M, Treweek S, Gagnier JJ, et al. Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement. BMJ, 2008, 337: a2390.
15. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol, 2008, 61(4): 344-349.
16. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care, 2007, 19(6): 349-357.
17. 钟婕, 周英凤. 实施性研究的概述及应用进展. 中华护理杂志, 2018, 53(7): 875-879.

Previous Article
The reporting quality of intervention animal studies published in Chinese journals: a quantitative analysis

Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

Interpretation of standards for reporting implementation studies (StaRI)

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Previous Article

Format

Content