1. |
田金徽. 系统评价再评价撰写注意事项. 中国药物评价, 2019, 36(1): 1-4.
|
2. |
Gurevitch J, Koricheva J, Nakagawa S, et al. Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis. Nature, 2018, 555(7695): 175-182.
|
3. |
Leeflang MM. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy. Clin Microbiol Infect, 2014, 20(2): 105-113.
|
4. |
Takwoingi Y, Leeflang MM, Deeks JJ. Empirical evidence of the importance of comparative studies of diagnostic test accuracy. Ann Intern Med, 2013, 158(7): 544-554.
|
5. |
Yang B, Vali Y, Dehmoobad Sharifabadi A, et al. Risk of bias assessment of test comparisons was uncommon in comparative accuracy systematic reviews: an overview of reviews. J Clin Epidemiol, 2020, 127: 167-174.
|
6. |
Galm BP, Qiao N, Klibanski A, et al. Accuracy of laboratory tests for the diagnosis of Cushing syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2020, 105(6): dgaa105.
|
7. |
Takwoingi Y, Partlett C, Riley RD, et al. Methods and reporting of systematic reviews of comparative accuracy were deficient: a methodological survey and proposed guidance. J Clin Epidemiol, 2020, 121: 1-14.
|
8. |
田晨, 杨秋玉, 赖鸿皓, 等. 诊断性试验准确性比较研究. 中国循证医学杂志, 2022, 22(5): 590-594.
|
9. |
杨秋玉, 陆瑶, 田晨, 等. 诊断试验准确性比较研究: 研究设计. 中国循证医学杂志, 2022, 22(6): 739-744.
|
10. |
Muka T, Glisic M, Milic J, et al. A 24-step guide on how to design, conduct, and successfully publish a systematic review and meta-analysis in medical research. Eur J Epidemiol, 2020, 35(1): 49-60.
|
11. |
Cronin P, Kelly AM, Altaee D, et al. How to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic imaging studies. Acad Radiol, 2018, 25(5): 573-593.
|
12. |
Leeflang MM, Davenport C, Bossuyt PM. Chapter 6: defining the review question // Deeks JJ, Bossuyt PM, Leeflang MM, et al. Cochrane Handbook for systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy version 2. London: Cochrane, 2022. Available at: https://training.cochrane.org/handbook-diagnostic-test-accuracy.
|
13. |
张永刚, 杨乐天, 杨鑫, 等. 诊断准确性试验的系统评价/Meta分析报告规范(PRISMA-DTA)的解读. 中国循证医学杂志, 2018, 18(9): 1007-1016.
|
14. |
Salameh JP, Bossuyt PM, McGrath TA, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): explanation, elaboration, and checklist. BMJ, 2020, 370: m2632.
|
15. |
Page MJ, Moher D, Bossuyt PM, et al. PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 2021, 372: n160.
|
16. |
Rethlefsen ML, Kirtley S, Waffenschmidt S, et al. PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA statement for reporting literature searches in systematic reviews. Syst Rev, 2021, 10(1): 39.
|
17. |
Bramer WM, Rethlefsen ML, Kleijnen J, et al. Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study. Syst Rev, 2017, 6(1): 245.
|
18. |
McInnes MDF, Moher D, Thombs BD, et al. Preferred reporting items for a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies: the PRISMA-DTA statement. JAMA, 2018, 319(4): 388-396.
|
19. |
Dinnes J, Deeks JJ, Leeflang MM, et al. Chapter 8: collecting data // Deeks JJ, Bossuyt PM, Leeflang MM, et al. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy version 2. London: Cochrane, 2022. Available at: https://training.cochrane.org/handbook-diagnostic-test-accuracy.
|
20. |
Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME, et al. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med, 2011, 155(8): 529-536.
|
21. |
Yang B, Mallett S, Takwoingi Y, et al. QUADAS-C: a tool for assessing risk of bias in comparative diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med, 2021, 174(11): 1592-1599.
|
22. |
Bossuyt PM. Chapter 4: understanding the design of test accuracy studies // Deeks JJ, Bossuyt PM, Leeflang MM, et al. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy version 2. London: Cochrane, 2022. Available at: https://training.cochrane.org/handbook-diagnostic-test-accuracy.
|
23. |
Deeks JJ, Takwoingi Y, Macaskill P, et al. Chapter 5: understanding test accuracy measures // Deeks JJ, Bossuyt PM, Leeflang MM, et al. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy version 2. London: Cochrane, 2022. Available at: https://training.cochrane.org/handbook-diagnostic-test-accuracy.
|
24. |
Hayen A, Macaskill P, Irwig L, et al. Appropriate statistical methods are required to assess diagnostic tests for replacement, add-on, and triage. J Clin Epidemiol, 2010, 63(8): 883-891.
|
25. |
Jones AP, Remmington T, Williamson PR, et al. High prevalence but low impact of data extraction and reporting errors were found in Cochrane systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol, 2005, 58(7): 741-742.
|
26. |
Clark J, Glasziou P, Del Mar C, et al. A full systematic review was completed in 2 weeks using automation tools: a case study. J Clin Epidemiol, 2020, 121: 81-90.
|
27. |
Beller E, Clark J, Tsafnat G, et al. Making progress with the automation of systematic reviews: principles of the International Collaboration for the Automation of Systematic Reviews (ICASR). Syst Rev, 2018, 7(1): 77.
|
28. |
Scott AM, Forbes C, Clark J, et al. Systematic review automation tools improve efficiency but lack of knowledge impedes their adoption: a survey. J Clin Epidemiol, 2021, 138: 80-94.
|
29. |
Whiting P, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, et al. The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol, 2003, 3: 25.
|
30. |
Yang B, Mustafa RA, Bossuyt PM, et al. GRADE Guidance: 31. Assessing the certainty across a body of evidence for comparative test accuracy. J Clin Epidemiol, 2021, 136: 146-156.
|
31. |
Macaskill P, Takwoingi Y, Deeks JJ, et al. Chapter 10: understanding meta-analysis // Deeks JJ, Bossuyt PM, Leeflang MM, et al. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy version 2. London: Cochrane, 2022. Available at: https://training.cochrane.org/handbook-diagnostic-test-accuracy.
|
32. |
Reitsma JB, Glas AS, Rutjes AW, et al. Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol, 2005, 58(10): 982-990.
|
33. |
Rutter CM, Gatsonis CA. A hierarchical regression approach to meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy evaluations. Stat Med, 2001, 20(19): 2865-2884.
|
34. |
Trikalinos TA, Hoaglin DC, Small KM, et al. Methods for the joint meta-analysis of multiple tests. Res Synth Methods, 2014, 5(4): 294-312.
|
35. |
Dimou NL, Adam M, Bagos PG. A multivariate method for meta-analysis and comparison of diagnostic tests. Stat Med, 2016, 35(20): 3509-3523.
|
36. |
Siadaty MS, Shu J. Proportional odds ratio model for comparison of diagnostic tests in meta-analysis. BMC Med Res Methodol, 2004, 4(1): 27.
|
37. |
Naaktgeboren CA, van Enst WA, Ochodo EA, et al. Systematic overview finds variation in approaches to investigating and reporting on sources of heterogeneity in systematic reviews of diagnostic studies. J Clin Epidemiol, 2014, 67(11): 1200-1209.
|
38. |
Andrade C. Understanding the basics of meta-analysis and how to read a forest plot: as simple as it gets. J Clin Psychiatry, 2020, 81(5): 20f13698.
|
39. |
Zhou Y, Dendukuri N. Statistics for quantifying heterogeneity in univariate and bivariate meta-analyses of binary data: the case of meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy. Stat Med, 2014, 33(16): 2701-2717.
|
40. |
van Enst WA, Ochodo E, Scholten RJ, et al. Investigation of publication bias in meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy: a meta-epidemiological study. BMC Med Res Methodol, 2014, 14: 70.
|
41. |
Deeks JJ, Macaskill P, Irwig L. The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed. J Clin Epidemiol, 2005, 58(9): 882-893.
|
42. |
Duval S, Tweedie R. Trim and fill: a simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 2000, 56(2): 455-463.
|
43. |
Bürkner PC, Doebler P. Testing for publication bias in diagnostic meta-analysis: a simulation study. Stat Med, 2014, 33(18): 3061-3077.
|
44. |
Begg CB. Systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies require study by study examination: first for heterogeneity, and then for sources of heterogeneity. J Clin Epidemiol, 2005, 58(9): 865-866.
|
45. |
张天嵩, 钟文昭. 非参数剪补法在Stata中的实现. 循证医学, 2009, 9(4): 240-242.
|
46. |
Schünemann HJ, Mustafa RA, Brozek J, et al. GRADE guidelines: 21 part 2. Test accuracy: inconsistency, imprecision, publication bias, and other domains for rating the certainty of evidence and presenting it in evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J Clin Epidemiol, 2020, 122: 142-152.
|
47. |
Merckx J, Wali R, Schiller I, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of novel and traditional rapid tests for influenza infection compared with reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med, 2017, 167(6): 394-409.
|
48. |
Chen L, Yang Q, Bao J, et al. Direct comparison of PET/CT and MRI to predict the pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: a meta-analysis. Sci Rep, 2017, 7(1): 8479.
|
49. |
高亚, 刘明, 杨珂璐, 等. 系统评价报告规范: PRISMA2020与PRISMA2009的对比分析与实例解读. 中国循证医学杂志, 2021, 21(5): 606-616.
|
50. |
Ferrante di Ruffano L, Hyde CJ, McCaffery KJ, et al. Assessing the value of diagnostic tests: a framework for designing and evaluating trials. BMJ, 2012, 344: e686.
|
51. |
Beynon R, Leeflang MM, McDonald S, et al. Search strategies to identify diagnostic accuracy studies in MEDLINE and EMBASE. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2013, (9): MR000022.
|