1. |
Takwoingi Y, Leeflang MM, Deeks JJ. Empirical evidence of the importance of comparative studies of diagnostic test accuracy. Ann Intern Med, 2013, 158(7): 544-554.
|
2. |
Yang B, Vali Y, Dehmoobad Sharifabadi A, et al. Risk of bias assessment of test comparisons was uncommon in comparative accuracy systematic reviews: an overview of reviews. J Clin Epidemiol, 2020, 127: 167-174.
|
3. |
Dehmoobad Sharifabadi A, Leeflang M, Treanor L, et al. Comparative reviews of diagnostic test accuracy in imaging research: evaluation of current practices. Eur Radiol, 2019, 29(10): 5386-5394.
|
4. |
Yang B, Mallett S, Takwoingi Y, et al. QUADAS-C: a tool for assessing risk of bias in comparative diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med, 2021, 174(11): 1592-1599.
|
5. |
Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME, et al. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med, 2011, 155(8): 529-536.
|
6. |
Takwoingi Y. Meta-analytic approaches for summarising and comparing the accuracy of medical tests. Birmingham: University of Birmingham Research Archive, 2016.
|
7. |
Leeflang MM. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy. Clin Microbiol Infect, 2014, 20(2): 105-113.
|
8. |
陈耀龙, 姚亮, Norris S, 等. GRADE在系统评价中应用的必要性及注意事项. 中国循证医学杂志, 2013, 13(12): 1401-1404.
|
9. |
Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Akl EA, et al. GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J Clin Epidemiol, 2011, 64(4): 383-394.
|
10. |
张薇, 许吉, 邓宏勇. 国际医学证据分级与推荐体系发展及现状. 中国循证医学杂志, 2019, 19(11): 1373-1378.
|
11. |
Leeflang MM, Deeks JJ, Takwoingi Y, et al. Cochrane diagnostic test accuracy reviews. Syst Rev, 2013, 2: 82.
|
12. |
Yang B, Mustafa RA, Bossuyt PM, et al. GRADE Guidance: 31. Assessing the certainty across a body of evidence for comparative test accuracy. J Clin Epidemiol, 2021, 136: 146-156.
|
13. |
田晨, 杨秋玉, 赖鸿皓, 等. 诊断性试验准确性比较研究. 中国循证医学杂志, 2022, 22(5): 590-594.
|
14. |
杨秋玉, 陆瑶, 田晨, 等. 诊断试验准确性比较研究: 研究设计. 中国循证医学杂志, 2022, 22(6): 739-744.
|
15. |
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ, 2008, 336(7650): 924-926.
|
16. |
Schünemann HJ, Mustafa RA, Brozek J, et al. GRADE guidelines: 21 part 1. Study design, risk of bias, and indirectness in rating the certainty across a body of evidence for test accuracy. J Clin Epidemiol, 2020, 122: 129-141.
|
17. |
Schünemann HJ, Mustafa RA, Brozek J, et al. GRADE guidelines: 21 part 2. Test accuracy: inconsistency, imprecision, publication bias, and other domains for rating the certainty of evidence and presenting it in evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J Clin Epidemiol, 2020, 122: 142-152.
|
18. |
Schünemann HJ, Mustafa RA, Brozek J, et al. GRADE guidelines: 22. The GRADE approach for tests and strategies-from test accuracy to patient-important outcomes and recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol, 2019, 111: 69-82.
|
19. |
Hultcrantz M, Mustafa RA, Leeflang MMG, et al. Defining ranges for certainty ratings of diagnostic accuracy: a GRADE concept paper. J Clin Epidemiol, 2020, 117: 138-148.
|
20. |
Tikkinen KAO, Craigie S, Schünemann HJ, et al. Certainty ranges facilitated explicit and transparent judgments regarding evidence credibility. J Clin Epidemiol, 2018, 104: 46-51.
|
21. |
Buderer NM. Statistical methodology: I. Incorporating the prevalence of disease into the sample size calculation for sensitivity and specificity. Acad Emerg Med, 1996, 3(9): 895-900.
|
22. |
Carley S, Dosman S, Jones SR, et al. Simple nomograms to calculate sample size in diagnostic studies. Emerg Med J, 2005, 22(3): 180-181.
|
23. |
Flahault A, Cadilhac M, Thomas G. Sample size calculation should be performed for design accuracy in diagnostic test studies. J Clin Epidemiol, 2005, 58(8): 859-862.
|
24. |
Brozek JL, Akl EA, Jaeschke R, et al. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines: Part 2 of 3. The GRADE approach to grading quality of evidence about diagnostic tests and strategies. Allergy, 2009, 64(8): 1109-1116.
|
25. |
Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD, Brozek J, et al. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies. BMJ, 2008, 336(7653): 1106-1110.
|
26. |
Schünemann HJ, Mustafa R, Brozek J, et al. GRADE Guidelines: 16. GRADE evidence to decision frameworks for tests in clinical practice and public health. J Clin Epidemiol, 2016, 76: 89-98.
|
27. |
Hultcrantz M, Rind D, Akl EA, et al. The GRADE Working Group clarifies the construct of certainty of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol, 2017, 87: 4-13.
|
28. |
栗梦婷, 朱鸿飞, 后亮瑛, 等. 网状Meta分析结论形成的方法: 最小背景化框架. 中国循证医学杂志, 2021, 21(9): 1102-1109.
|
29. |
朱鸿飞, 栗梦婷, 后亮瑛, 等. 网状Meta分析结论形成的方法: 部分背景化框架. 中国循证医学杂志, 2021, 21(9): 1110-1116.
|
30. |
Mustafa RA, Santesso N, Khatib R, et al. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of the accuracy of HPV tests, visual inspection with acetic acid, cytology, and colposcopy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2016, 132(3): 259-265.
|
31. |
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence-imprecision. J Clin Epidemiol, 2011, 64(12): 1283-1293.
|
32. |
Guyatt G, Oxman DA, Kunz R, 等. GRADE指南: Ⅵ. 证据质量评价—不精确性(随机误差). 中国循证医学杂志, 2011, 11(12): 1435-1443.
|
33. |
Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, et al. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ, 1997, 315(7109): 629-634.
|
34. |
Begg CB, Mazumdar M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics, 1994, 50(4): 1088-1101.
|
35. |
Deeks JJ, Macaskill P, Irwig L. The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed. J Clin Epidemiol, 2005, 58(9): 882-893.
|
36. |
Duval S, Tweedie R. Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 2000, 56(2): 455-463.
|
37. |
Bürkner PC, Doebler P. Testing for publication bias in diagnostic meta-analysis: a simulation study. Stat Med, 2014, 33(18): 3061-3077.
|