Progress in Evaluating Quality of Life in Postoperative Patients with Valvular Heart Disease Using SF-36 Health Survey_Chinese Journal of Clinical Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Authors：

YAN Tao , XU Zhiyun.

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, P. R. China;;
Email： yt190@163. com;

Corresponding author：

Keywords：

Quality of life; 　Valvular heart disease; 　Risk factor; 　SF-36

Video：

Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Abstract：　Quality of life （QOL） refers to an individual’s perception and subjective evaluation of their health and well-being, and has become an important index to evaluate the outcomes of clinical treatment in the last past decades. There are a large number of different instruments to evaluate QOL, and the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey （SF-36） is currently one of the most widely used instruments. In recent years, SF-36 has been used to evaluate QOL of valvular heart disease patients to investigate the risk factors those influence their postoperative QOL, provide more preoperative evaluation tools for clinical physicians, and improve postoperative outcomes of patients with valvular heart disease. However, it is now just the beginning to use SF-36 to examine QOL of valvular heart disease patients. Because of significant differences in sample size, follow-up period, country and culture, current research has some controversial results. This review focuses on the progress in evaluating QOL in postoperative patients with valvular heart disease using SF-36.

Citation： YAN Tao,XU Zhiyun.. Progress in Evaluating Quality of Life in Postoperative Patients with Valvular Heart Disease Using SF-36 Health Survey. Chinese Journal of Clinical Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2012, 19(4): 419-422. doi: Copy

1.	徐志云. 心血管手术风险预测研究与现状. 中国胸心血管外科临床杂志， 2011， 18 （3）：187-188.
2.	Aaronson NK， Acquadro C， Alonso J， et al. International Quality of Life Assessment （IQOLA） Project. Qual Life Res， 1992， 1 （5）：349-351.
3.	Power M， Harper A， Bullinger M. The World Health Organization WHOQOL-100： tests of the universality of quality of life in 15 different cultural groups worldwide. Health Psychol， 1999， 18 （5）：495-505.
4.	Ware JE， Snow KK， Kosinski M， et al. Chief editor. SF-36 Health Survey： Manual and Interpretation Guide. Boston： New England Medical Center the Health Institute， 1993. 1-2.
5.	Ware JE Jr， Kosinski M， Gandek B， et al. The factor structure of the SF-36 Health Survey in 10 countries： results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment. J Clin Epidemiol， 1998， 51 （11）：1159-1165.
6.	Ware JE Jr， Gandek B. Overview of the SF-36 Health Survey and the International Quality of Life Assessment （IQOLA） Project. J Clin Epidemiol， 1998， 51 （11）：903-912.
7.	McCarthy MJ Jr， Shroyer AL， Sethi GK， et al. Self-report measures for assessing treatment outcomes in cardiac surgery patients. Med Care， 1995， 33 （10 Suppl）：OS76-85.
8.	Ware JE Jr， Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey （SF-36）.Ⅰ. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care， 1992， 30 （6）：473-483.
9.	Sundt TM， Bailey MS， Moon MR， et al. Quality of life after aortic valve replacement at the age of ＞80 years. Circulation， 2000， 102 （19 Suppl 3）：Ⅲ70-74.
10.	Goldsmith IR， Lip GY， Patel RL. A prospective study of changes in the quality of life of patients following mitral valve repair and replacement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg， 2001， 20 （5）：949-955.
11.	Goldsmith IR， Lip GY， Patel RL. A prospective study of changes in patients′ quality of life after aortic valve replacement. J Heart Valve Dis， 2001， 10 （3）：346-353.
12.	Sedrakyan A， Vaccarino V， Paltiel AD， et al. Age does not limit quality of life improvement in cardiac valve surgery. J Am Coll　Cardiol， 2003， 42 （7）：1208-1214.
13.	Viganò G， Guidotti A， Taramasso M， et al. Clinical mid-term results after tricuspid valve replacement. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg， 2010， 10 （5）：709-713.
14.	Baberg HT， Dirlich M， Laczkovics A， et al. Determinants of health-related quality of life after aortic valve replacement in six-month survivors of intervention. J Heart Valve Dis， 2004， 13 （6）：914-920.
15.	Hansen L， Winkel S， Kuhr J， et al. Factors influencing survival and postoperative quality of life after mitral valve reconstruction. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg， 2010， 37 （3）：635-644.
16.	Perchinsky M， Henderson C， Jamieson WR， et al. Quality of life in patients with bioprostheses and mechanical prostheses. Evaluation of cohorts of patients aged 51 to 65 years at implantation. Circulation， 1998， 98 （19 Suppl）：II81-87.
17.	Nötzold A， Hüppe M， Schmidtke C， et al. Quality of life in aortic valve replacement： pulmonary autografts versus mechanical prostheses. J Am Coll Cardiol， 2001， 37 （7）：1963-1966.
18.	Sedrakyan A， Vaccarino V， Elefteriades JA， et al. Health related quality of life after mitral valve repairs and replacements. Qual Life Res， 2006， 15 （7）：1153-1160.
19.	Kurlansky PA， Williams DB， Traad EA， et al. The valve of choice in elderly patients and its influence on quality of life： a long-term comparative study. J Heart Valve Dis， 2006， 15 （2）：180- 190.
20.	Koertke H， Hoffmann-Koch A， Boethig D， et al. Does the noise of mechanical heart valve prostheses affect quality of life as measured by the SF-36 questionnaire ? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg， 2003， 24 （1）：52-58.
21.	Vicchio M， Della Corte A， De Santo LS， et al. Prosthesis-patient mismatch in the elderly： survival， ventricular mass regression， and quality of life. Ann Thorac Surg， 2008， 86 （6）：1791-1797.
22.	Mrówczyński W， Lutter G， Attmann T， et al. Does patient-prosthesis mismatch influence the results of combined aortic valve replacement and coronary bypass grafting ? Kardiol Pol， 2009， 67 （8）：865-873.
23.	Urso S， Sadaba R， Vives M， et al. Patient-prosthesis mismatch in elderly patients undergoing aortic valve replacement： impact on quality of life and survival. J Heart Valve Dis， 2009， 18 （3）：248-255.
24.	钱希明，钟世镇. 主动脉瓣不匹配对老年病人术后生活质量的影响. 南方医科大学学报， 2009， 29 （10）：2055-2058， 2063.
25.	Immer FE， Donati O， Wyss T， et al. Quality of life after mitral valve surgery： differences between reconstruction and replacement. J Heart Valve Dis， 2003， 12 （2）：162-168.
26.	李鲁，王红妹，沈毅. SF-36健康调查量表中文版的研制及其性能测试. 中华预防医学杂志， 2002， 36 （02）：109-113.
27.	李俊，刘朝杰，李宁秀，等. 生命质量评价量表SF-36中国量化标准研究. 华西医科大学学报， 2001， 32 （01）：36-38， 47.

1. 　徐志云. 心血管手术风险预测研究与现状. 中国胸心血管外科临床杂志， 2011， 18 （3）：187-188.
2. 　Aaronson NK， Acquadro C， Alonso J， et al. International Quality of Life Assessment （IQOLA） Project. Qual Life Res， 1992， 1 （5）：349-351.
3. 　Power M， Harper A， Bullinger M. The World Health Organization WHOQOL-100： tests of the universality of quality of life in 15 different cultural groups worldwide. Health Psychol， 1999， 18 （5）：495-505.
4. 　Ware JE， Snow KK， Kosinski M， et al. Chief editor. SF-36 Health Survey： Manual and Interpretation Guide. Boston： New England Medical Center the Health Institute， 1993. 1-2.
5. 　Ware JE Jr， Kosinski M， Gandek B， et al. The factor structure of the SF-36 Health Survey in 10 countries： results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment. J Clin Epidemiol， 1998， 51 （11）：1159-1165.
6. 　Ware JE Jr， Gandek B. Overview of the SF-36 Health Survey and the International Quality of Life Assessment （IQOLA） Project. J Clin Epidemiol， 1998， 51 （11）：903-912.
7. 　McCarthy MJ Jr， Shroyer AL， Sethi GK， et al. Self-report measures for assessing treatment outcomes in cardiac surgery patients. Med Care， 1995， 33 （10 Suppl）：OS76-85.
8. 　Ware JE Jr， Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey （SF-36）.Ⅰ. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care， 1992， 30 （6）：473-483.
9. 　Sundt TM， Bailey MS， Moon MR， et al. Quality of life after aortic valve replacement at the age of ＞80 years. Circulation， 2000， 102 （19 Suppl 3）：Ⅲ70-74.
10. 　Goldsmith IR， Lip GY， Patel RL. A prospective study of changes in the quality of life of patients following mitral valve repair and replacement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg， 2001， 20 （5）：949-955.
11. 　Goldsmith IR， Lip GY， Patel RL. A prospective study of changes in patients′ quality of life after aortic valve replacement. J Heart Valve Dis， 2001， 10 （3）：346-353.
12. 　Sedrakyan A， Vaccarino V， Paltiel AD， et al. Age does not limit quality of life improvement in cardiac valve surgery. J Am Coll　Cardiol， 2003， 42 （7）：1208-1214.
13. 　Viganò G， Guidotti A， Taramasso M， et al. Clinical mid-term results after tricuspid valve replacement. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg， 2010， 10 （5）：709-713.
14. 　Baberg HT， Dirlich M， Laczkovics A， et al. Determinants of health-related quality of life after aortic valve replacement in six-month survivors of intervention. J Heart Valve Dis， 2004， 13 （6）：914-920.
15. 　Hansen L， Winkel S， Kuhr J， et al. Factors influencing survival and postoperative quality of life after mitral valve reconstruction. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg， 2010， 37 （3）：635-644.
16. 　Perchinsky M， Henderson C， Jamieson WR， et al. Quality of life in patients with bioprostheses and mechanical prostheses. Evaluation of cohorts of patients aged 51 to 65 years at implantation. Circulation， 1998， 98 （19 Suppl）：II81-87.
17. 　Nötzold A， Hüppe M， Schmidtke C， et al. Quality of life in aortic valve replacement： pulmonary autografts versus mechanical prostheses. J Am Coll Cardiol， 2001， 37 （7）：1963-1966.
18. 　Sedrakyan A， Vaccarino V， Elefteriades JA， et al. Health related quality of life after mitral valve repairs and replacements. Qual Life Res， 2006， 15 （7）：1153-1160.
19. 　Kurlansky PA， Williams DB， Traad EA， et al. The valve of choice in elderly patients and its influence on quality of life： a long-term comparative study. J Heart Valve Dis， 2006， 15 （2）：180- 190.
20. 　Koertke H， Hoffmann-Koch A， Boethig D， et al. Does the noise of mechanical heart valve prostheses affect quality of life as measured by the SF-36 questionnaire ? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg， 2003， 24 （1）：52-58.
21. 　Vicchio M， Della Corte A， De Santo LS， et al. Prosthesis-patient mismatch in the elderly： survival， ventricular mass regression， and quality of life. Ann Thorac Surg， 2008， 86 （6）：1791-1797.
22. 　Mrówczyński W， Lutter G， Attmann T， et al. Does patient-prosthesis mismatch influence the results of combined aortic valve replacement and coronary bypass grafting ? Kardiol Pol， 2009， 67 （8）：865-873.
23. 　Urso S， Sadaba R， Vives M， et al. Patient-prosthesis mismatch in elderly patients undergoing aortic valve replacement： impact on quality of life and survival. J Heart Valve Dis， 2009， 18 （3）：248-255.
24. 　钱希明，钟世镇. 主动脉瓣不匹配对老年病人术后生活质量的影响. 南方医科大学学报， 2009， 29 （10）：2055-2058， 2063.
25. 　Immer FE， Donati O， Wyss T， et al. Quality of life after mitral valve surgery： differences between reconstruction and replacement. J Heart Valve Dis， 2003， 12 （2）：162-168.
26. 　李鲁，王红妹，沈毅. SF-36健康调查量表中文版的研制及其性能测试. 中华预防医学杂志， 2002， 36 （02）：109-113.
27. 　李俊，刘朝杰，李宁秀，等. 生命质量评价量表SF-36中国量化标准研究. 华西医科大学学报， 2001， 32 （01）：36-38， 47.

Chinese Journal of Clinical Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Progress in Evaluating Quality of Life in Postoperative Patients with Valvular Heart Disease Using SF-36 Health Survey

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Format

Content