Abstract： Objective To summarize our operative experiences of cardiac reoperation after mechanical valve prosthesis replacement and investigate the causes of reoperation and the perioperative techniques and operation methods. Methods From January 2001 to December 2008, we performed reoperation on 105 patients (59 males and 46 females, aged 50.2±10.6 years old) who had undergone mechanical valve prosthesis replacement. Among the patients, there were 31 cases of mitral valvular replacement (+ tricuspid valvular plasticity), 38 cases of aortic valvular replacement (+ tricuspid valvular plasticity), 11 cases of Bentall procedure, 7 cases of mitral and aortic bivalvular replacement (+tricuspid valvular plasticity), 8 cases of tricuspid valvular replacement, 6 cases of repairing of prosthetic leakage, and 4 others cases. The time interval between two operations was 3 months to 18 years (46.3 ±31.9 months). Before reoperation, the cardiac function (NYHA) of the patients was class Ⅱ in 27 patients, class Ⅲ in 53 patients, and class Ⅳ in 25 patients. Results There were 6 hospital deaths with a mortality of 5.71%(6/105). All others recovered to NYHA class ⅠⅡ. The causes of mortality included 1 case of multiple organ failure, 1 case of low cardiac output after operation, 1 case of aortic pseudoaneurysm rupture, 1 case of severe infection due to brain complication and 2 cases of prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE). The causes for cardiac reoperation after mechanical valve prosthesis replacement were 67 cases of prosthetic leakage (63.80%), 16 cases of PVE (15.23%), 14 cases of prosthetic thrombosis (13.33%) and 8 cases of other valvular anomalies. Followup was done for 11 to 107 months, which showed two cases late deaths of cardiac arrest and cerebral hemorrhage. Conclusion Patients who have received mechanical valve prosthesis replacement may undergo cardiac reoperation due to paravalvular prosthetic leakage, paravalvular endocarditis, and prosthetic thrombosis. The keys to a successful cardiac reoperation include appropriate preoperative preparations, operational timing, and suitable choosing of cardiopulmonary bypass and operational skills.
Abstract: Objective To summarize the experiences of treatment for prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE), paying special emphasis on some interrelated conceptions of PVE, its microbiology, diagnosis, prevention and treatment. Methods From September 1979 to September 2009, 33 patients diagnosed to have PVE were treated in our department. There were 17 males and 16 females. Their age ranged from 19 to 57 years old with an average age of 34 years. The incidence of PVE was 1.48% （33/2 236）including 1.03%（16/1 551）, 3.00%（7/233）, 2.28%（10/438）, and 0% of PVE in mitral valve replacement (MVR), aortic valve replacement (AVR), double valve replacement (DVR), tricuspid valve replacement (TVR), respectively. Pure medical treatment (Penicillin or Vancomycin with other broadspectrum antibiotics, Fluconazole and Amphotericin) was performed on 22 patients. Combined medical and surgical treatment was performed in 11 patients. The patients underwent operation after adequate antibiotics treatment and general condition improvement. The infective tissue and vegetation were completely debrided after the infective prosthetic valve was removed. Before the new valve was transplanted, paravalvular tissue was cleaned with antibiotics, iodine solution and normal saline. Results Hospital death occurred in 19 patients (86.36%) and only 3 patients (13.64%) recovered in the group with pure medical treatment. The main reasons for death were infective shock and cardiac failure in 9 patients, and cerebral complications including embolism, bleeding and multipleorgan failure in 10 patients. For the group with combined medical and surgical treatment, 10 patients (90.91%) survived and only one patient (9.09%) died of multipleorgan failure. Follow-up was done in 13 patients for 6 months to 15 years averaging 41 months. During the follow-up, only one patient was reoperated because of the paravalvular leak eight year later. There was no PVE recurrence in all the rest patients. Conclusion Compared with pure medical treatment, combined medical and surgical treatment is a better solution for PVE.
Abstract: Prosthetic valve endocarditis(PVE) is a catastrophic complication of cardiac valve replacement, associated with high mortality rates. In the past nearly five decades, the microbiology, pathophysiology, clinical features, and therapeutic options in PVE have changed a lot, and there are new insight into the pathogenesis of PVE. The current comprehensive review will address various issues involved in the diagnosis and management of this complication.
Objective To evaluate the effect of treating Ebstein ’s anomaly w ith tricuspid valve replacement (TVR), and analyze the indications and personali ze the surgical methods of TVR. Methods 35 TVR in 32 cases of Eb stein’s anomaly not amenable to repair from May 1993 to June 2007 in An zhen Hospital were retrospectively. The mortality and complication incidence wer e estimat ed and the KaplanMeier survival curves were constructed to estimate actual sur vival and freedom from thrombus embolism rate, and comparative studies were unde rtaken to e valuate the clinical effect between implanting the prosthesis in the original tr icu spid ring or above the coronary sinus, and between fold the atrialized ventricle or not, and between preserve the autologous tricuspid or not. The univariate an alysis and logistic regression were used to explore the early and late death ris k factors. Results There were 2 early hospital death (6.25%). Followup of 30 patients who survived 30 days ra nged up to 14 years (4.2±3.5years)，there were 3 TVR reoperation due to the pro sthesis deterioration. There were 2 late deaths（6.67%）, and the actuarial surv i val at 5,10 year was 92.1%±4.6%, 86.5%±5.8% respectively in KaplanMeier cu rve. There were 2 events of thrombus embolism that were cured through thromboly tic therapy, thus the freedom from thrombus embolism at 5 and 10 yers reached 91 . 3%±4.5%,82.3%±4.2% respectively. 24 late survivors were in New York Heart Ass ociation(NYHA) functional cl ass I, and 4 in NYHA functional class II. The incidence of atria ventricular nod e rhythm in patients with the prosthesis implanted in original tricuspid ring wa s statistically higher than that of prosthesis implanted above the coronary sinus,and the incidence of paradoxical ventricular septal motion in patients wi thout folding the atrialized ventricle was statistically higher that of with fol ding the atrialized ventricle, but the NYHA functional class was not affected by these factors.The univariate analysis and logistic regres sion revealed that preoperative functional right ventricle/atrialized ventriclelt; 1 and ascites were the independent risk factor for the early death (P=0.023, 0.025), whereas preoperative ascites and edema in lower extremities were the in dependent risk factors for late death (P=0.026, 0.019). Conclusion TVR is a good therapeutically option for Ebstein’s anomaly si nce the operative risk is low, the functional status improved in all patients an d the durability of prosthesis in tricuspid position has been good. In order to maximize the effect of the TVR in Ebstein’s anomaly, personalized procedure sho uld be adopted in deciding whether to fold the atrialized ventricle or not, to p reserve the autologous tricuspid valve or not, and to implant the prosthesis in the original tricuspid ring or above the coronary sinus.
ObjectiveTo discuss the influence of early postoperative hemodynamic, postoperative mortality and the incidence of adverse cardiovascular events with the phenomenon of prosthesis-patient mismatch. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 89 patients who had simple aortic valve replacement in our hospital bewteen January 2012 and January 2014. The 89 patients were divided into two groups including a match group (16 females and 48 males with average age of 58.1±10.4 years) and a mismatch group (15 females and 10 males with average age of 65.3±12.8 years). We compared early results between the two groups. ResultsThere is a statistic difference (P < 0.05) in aortic flow velocity, mean pressure gradient, and the maximum pressure gradient between the two groups. The survival rate of the match group is significantly lower than that of the mismatch group (P < 0.05). And there is a statistical difference in adverse cardiovascular event-free incidence between the two groups (P < 0.001). ConclusionThe phenomenon of prosthesis-patient mismatch can affect postoperative hemodynamic and lead to heart failure after surgery. And early mortality and the incidence of cardiovascular adverse events in patients are increased due to prosthesis-patient mismatch.
Objective To analyze the mid-term results of surgical treatment for prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE). Methods We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 22 PVE patients operated in our institution from January 2006 to June 2016. There were 14 males and 8 females, aged 31-62 (49.6±11.8) years. PVE occurred following single valve replacements in 20 patients, including aortic valve replacements in 12 and mitral valve replacements in 8. Two patients suffered PVE after multi-valve replacement, which was aortic and mitral valves. Mechanical valves were used in all patients. Early PVE (<1 year after valve implantation) was detected in 10 patients, and late PVE (>1 year after valve implantation) in 12 patients. Blood culture was negative in 6 patients. Fifteen patients underwent emergent or urgent surgery (within one week after definite diagnosis) and 7 elective surgery. Paravalvular abscess was detected in 12 patients and repaired bovine pericardium. Results Three patients (13.6%) died postoperatively in hospital, among whom two died of multiple systemic organ failure, and the other died of cerebral hemorrhage. Main postoperative complications included low cardiac output syndrome in 5 patients (22.7%), renal dysfunction in 6 (27.3%), respiratory failure in 5 (22.7%) and pulmonary infection in 4 (18.2%). During the follow-up of 6-120 (53.6±20.8) months, 2 deaths were observed in the middle term, including one sudden death and the other of cerebral infarction. No recurrent infection or valve-related surgery was observed during the follow-up. The survival rate was 86.4% in 1 year and 70.4% in 5 years. Conclusion PVE is a very severe disease with high mortality. Early surgical treatment and complete removal of infectious tissues have preferable early- and mid-term results.