ObjectiveTo set up the evaluation form for classroom teaching quality in nursing humanities concern education, in order to conduct the evaluation on nursing teachers in their teaching of humanistic concern in their nursing class teaching. MethodsWe applied the Delphi approach to consult 16 nursing experts to screen the evaluation indicators combining with the method of dispersion degree. Analytic hierarchy process was carried out to determine the indicator weight to establish the evaluation form. Then we used the form to investigate a small sample of 37 nursing teachers. According to the test results, we checked the reliability and validity of the evaluation form. ResultsThe evaluation form was finally determined. It consisted of five level-1 indicators as well as 23 level-2 indicators. The results of Cranach's α showed that the internal consistency reliability and sensitivity of the evaluation form were very high. The results of Spearman correlation analysis showed that the construction of the evaluation form was quite reasonable. The results of factor analysis showed that the discriminant validity of the evaluation form was quite good. ConclusionThe evaluation form is true, credible and reasonably built. It may be used for self-assessment by the teachers, mutual evaluation as well as evaluation of teachers by leaders or experts for the assessment of humanistic teaching in nursing classes.
Objective To understand the effect and influencing factors of humanistic care on improving the experience of inpatients. Methods Patients were collected from a third grade class A women’s and children’s hospital in June 2015 and June 2016, and their satisfaction was investigated by a third party. The service items of Inpatients Satisfaction Item Score Table in 2015 were analyzed. Appropriate intervention measures were taken to low-score items, such as humanistic knowledge training to all medical staff, improvement health guidelines, implementation of recycling process, carrying out high quality nursing interventions, and so on. The patients satisfaction survey results in 2016 were compared with those of 2015. Results In 2016, the total satisfaction rate (89.94%), and the average score of items ranked the top three (94.64±0.14), including the level of medical technology, medical ethics and the overall evaluation of doctor’s professional ehtics, medical communication and service attitude, were higher than those of 2015 (85.25, 90.86±1.53). The average score of items ranked the last three (89.25±9.21), including hospital ward, hospital environment (clean, quiet and safe), hospital meals and room service, and hospital food quality, was higher than that of 2015 (78.64±2.40). However, compared with the same period in the last year, the rank of hospital environment fell by two places. Conclusions Hardware conditions like physical environment have an important impact on the experience of hospital patients. However, humanistic care is the key factor to improve the patients’ inpatient experience and satisfaction.
By reviewing the current status of chronic pain and combining with the new definition of pain revised by the International Association for the Study of Pain in 2020, firstly a prevention-based approach, self-management of pain, and multidisciplinary collaboration based on the integration of bio-psycho-social-environmental factors is proposed. The medical mode will greatly improve the treatment effect of chronic pain and the quality of life of patients. Secondly, the importance of strengthening humanistic care and paying attention to health education, as well as improving medical staff’s awareness of chronic pain and the level of diagnosis and treatment are pointed out. Finally, it is clarified that innovative non-drug treatments and the establishment of digital pain management platforms are the future of chronic pain.
ObjectiveTo explore the effect of continuous nursing on lung transplant patients at home based on humanistic care. MethodsAccording to hospitalization order, patients who received lung transplantation in our hospital from January 2016 to October 2020 were divided into a control group and a nursing group. The control group was treated with routine lung transplantation education and regular follow-up after discharge, and the nursing group received humanistic care during follow-up, health education at discharge, cultural exchange activities, and home care plans. After discharge, the self-management ability at home, medication adherence and satisfaction of home care between the two groups were campared. ResultsA total of 60 patients were included in the study. There were 23 patients in the control group, including 16 males and 7 females, with an average age of 58.70±11.00 years. There were 37 pateints in the nursing group, including 25 males and 12 females, with an average age of 57.90±13.20 years. The scores of self-management ability at home of the nursing group (self-concept 27.41±2.37 points vs. 21.78±3.54 points; self-care responsibility 20.73±1.63 points vs. 16.83±2.79 points; self-care skills 41.46±3.77 points vs. 28.26±4.11 points; health knowledge level 57.95±4.10 points vs. 44.87±5.79 points) were higher than those in the control group (all P＜0.05). The medication adherence (7.47±0.46 points vs. 6.87±0.28 points) and satisfaction of home care (23.80±1.20 points vs. 20.50±1.90 points) in the nursing group were higher than those in the control group (both P<0.05). ConclusionContinuous nursing based on humanistic care for lung transplant patients can effectively improve the self-management ability, medication adherence and nursing satisfaction of patients after discharge.