Objective To analyze and explain how to treat 1 patient with post-ERCP hemobilia based on best clinical evidence. Methods We used EST and EPBD, ENBD, Hemobilia as key words to search MEDLINE （1978 ～ 2004） and CBMdisc（1978 ～ 2004） to find the best clinical evidence and evaluated the quality of evidence. Results According to the evidence, we found that endoscopic papillary balloon dilation （EPBD） or endoscopic nasobiliary drainage （ ENBD ） may be more effective and better tolerated in the treatment ofpost-ERCP hemobilia. Our patient did not receive sufficient medical treatment after hemobilia. He was not given a general assessment before surgery including liver function tests. As a result, the patient died of liver failure and its complications. Conclusions We should treat such patients promptly and efficiendy after hemobilia. We should also evaluate their general condition properly before the operation.
目的:探讨腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)与内镜十二指肠乳头括约肌切开术(EST)联合应用治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的临床效果。方法:回顾性分析我院开展的LC联合EST治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石76例,其中56例先行EST后行LC,20例先行LC后行ERCP/EST。结果:本组全部治愈,先行EST组56例,3例并发胰腺炎,3例出血,2例再发胆总管结石,先行LC组20例行EST11例,6例取石后未做括约肌切开,3例结石自行掉入肠道,1例出现胆道感染,1例胰腺炎,无出血及穿孔。结论:内镜治疗胆囊结石继发胆总管结石具有创伤小、效果好、并发症少、恢复快的的特点;先作EST可解除胆道梗阻、减轻炎症,并为LC创造条件,选择性先行LC后可减轻创伤,甚至不必做EST。
Objective To discuss the therapeutic effect and safety of laparoscopic cholecystectomy plus laparoscopiccommon bile duct exploration （LC＋LCBDE） and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography/endoscopic sphincte-rotomy plus LC （ERCP/EST＋LC） for cholecystolithiasis with choledocholithiasis patients with obstructive jaundice. Methods The clinical data of cholecystolithiasis with choledocholithiasis patients with obstructive jaundice from January2011 to June 2012 were analyzed retrospectively. During this period， 48 patients were treated by LC＋LCBDE （LC＋LCBDE group）， and 76 patients by ERCP/EST＋LC （ERCP/EST＋LC group）. Results ①There were no statistical significances in the age， gender， preoperative total bilirubin， alanine aminotransferase， number and maximum diameter of common bile duct stone， and internal diameter of common bile duct in two groups （P＞0.05）. ②No perioperative mortality occurred and no significant differences were observed in terms of stone clearance from the common bile duct， postoperative morbidity， and conversion to open surgery in two groups （P＞0.05）. However， the operative time and post-operative hospital stay in the LC＋LCBDE group were shorter than those in the ERCP/EST＋LC group （P＜0.05）. In addi-tion， the costs of surgical procedure and hospitalization charges in the LC＋LCBDE group were less than those in the ERCP/EST＋LC group （P＜0.05）. Conclusions Both LC＋LCBDE and ERCP/EST＋LC are safe and effective therapies forcholecystolithiasis with choledocholithiasis patients with obstructive jaundice. However， LC＋LCBDE is better for pati-ents’ recovery and cost effective. Especially for patients with common bile duct＞1.0cm in diameter or with multiple common bile duct stones， LC＋LCBDE is the best choice. To sum up， the choice of minimally invasive treatment must be individualized according to the patient’s condition and the availability of local resources.
Objective To analyze the clinical features， common etiologies， prevention measurements of recurrent acute pancreatitis （AP）. Methods The clinical characteristics and imaging examination data of 43 patients with recurrent AP were analyzed retrospectively， which was compared with the results of 258 patients with primary AP. The recurrence etiologies were analyzed. Results There were no significant differences on the fever， jaundice， abdominal pain relief time， pancreatic local complications， and ratio of severe AP between two groups （P＞0.05）. Comparion of etiologies between recurrent AP and primary AP， cholecystitis and diet factor （alcoholic） had priority in patients with primary AP （P=0.038， P=0.006， respectively）， but the hyperlipidemic， duodenal nipple disease， and small stone in the common bile duct were the major etiologies in patients with recurrent AP （P=0.007， P=0.008， respectively）. No relapse was found within the follow up for 3 months to 2 years （the average time was 14.2 months）. Conclusion Find out the exact etiology and performe correct therapy are the key to the treatment and prevention of recurrent AP.
Objective To analyze cause and therapy of perforation of choledocho-pancreatico-duodenal junction associated with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and its related procedures. Method The clinical data of 11 patients diagnosed with the perforation of choledocho-pancreatico-duodenal junction associated with the ERCP from January 2010 to January 2017 were analyzed retrospectively. Results Of 11 patients, 5 were diagnosed within 24 h, 3 were diagnosed between 24 h and 48 h, 3 were diagnosed above 48 h. Seven patients who immediately operated were cured following definitive diagnosis, 2 died after undergoing the delayed operation, 2 died after receiving the conservative treatment. The results of the anatomical-pathological factors showed that 4 were the anomalous arrangement of pancreaticobiliary ducts, 2 were the periampullary diverticula, 3 were the exposure of common bile duct in the pancreas level, 2 had no bile duct abnormality. Conclusions Preoperative evaluation on anatomical-pathological factor of bile duct is importance to effectively predict risk of perforation of choledocho-pancreatico-duodenal junction associated with ERCP. Early precise diagnosis and actively surgical operation are essential for optimal outcome in patient with perforation of choledocho-pancreatico-duodenal junction associated with ERCP.
Pancreatic duct stones are secondary to chronic pancreatitis while conventional medical treatment is always not effective. Due to the advantages of less trauma, simple operation, and fewer complications, since endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) combined with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) was first used in the treatment of pancreatic duct stones in 1987, the treatment method has been continuously improved for more than 30 years, and has experienced the development process from being questioned to becoming the first-line treatment for pancreatic duct stones in multinational guidelines nowadays. However, with the rapid development of science and technology today, the method of ERCP combined with extracorporeal lithotripsy is also facing the challenges of many other treatment methods.
ObjectiveTo investigate the etiology of pediatric pancreatitis and the effect of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in it. MethodsPatients hospitalized for pancreatitis in West China Hospital of Sichuan University from Jan. 2008 to Jun. 2023 were included according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Totally, 241 cases (207 cases with acute pancreatitis and 34 with chronic pancreatitis) were included. Patients were divided into primary group (n=168) and recurrent group (n=73) according to their previous medical history. ResultsThe duration of hospitalization in the primary group was longer than that in the recurrent group [10.0 (7.0, 16.0) d vs. 7.5 (6.0, 11.8) d, P=0.012]. The proportion of acute pancreatitis in primary group (163/168, 97.0%) was higher than that in the recurrent group (44/73, 60.3%), P<0.001. There was no significant difference in the etiological component ratio between the primary and recurrent groups (χ2=7.504, P=0.347). However, in the primary group, the first etiology was biliary factors (38/163, 23.3%), and the second was biliary pancreatic anatomic abnormality (22/163, 13.5%). In the recurrence group, biliary pancreatic anatomic abnormality (13/44, 29.5%) was the first cause, and biliary factor (7/44, 15.9%) was the second cause. Among 207 cases with acute pancreatitis, there were 114 cases (55.1%) with clear etiology, including 45 cases (21.7%) of biliary factors, 35 cases (16.9%) of abnormal biliary pancreatic structure, 12 cases (5.8%) of traumatic factors, and 10 cases (4.8%) of drug-induced factors. In this study, 66 cases were treated with ERCP for pancreatitis, and a total of 103 ERCP operations were performed with cannulation success rate of 100%. Twenty-three cases (23/37, 62.2%) of acute pancreatitis resulted from biliary and biliary pancreatic structure abnormalities received ERCP. In biliary acute pancreatitis, the removal rate of choledocholithiasis in single ERCP operation was 80.0% (8/10). The clinical symptoms (abdominal pain, jaundice, and fever) of all cases were significantly improved after surgery, and no complications such as cholangitis, bleeding and perforation occurred. ConclusionsBiliary, congenital pancreatic anatomical abnormalities, drugs and trauma are the common causes of acute pancreatitis in children. ERCP is a safe and effective treatment for children with biliary pancreatitis, pancreatic anatomical abnormalities, and chronic pancreatitis.