Objective To investigate perfusion features of gastric antrum cancer by 64-multidetector CT and to assess the correlation between perfusion CT parameters and immunohistochemical markers of angiogenesis in gastric cancer. Methods Perfusion CT was performed in 30 patients with gastric antrum cancer （gastric antrum cancer group） and 24 patients with normal stomach (control group), and postoperative specimens were stained using a polyclonal antibody to VEGF and CD34. The correlation between perfusion parameters and microvessel density (MVD), and VEGF were analyzed. Results Blood volume (BV) increased in the gastric antrum cancer group (Plt;0.01). There was no significant difference in perfusion (PF), peak enhancement (PE), or time to peak (TTP) between the gastric antrum cancer and the normal groups (Pgt;0.05). BV was positively significantly correlated with MVD （r=0.522, P=0.02), but no significant correlation was found between PF （r=0.072, P=0.78), PE （r=0.253, P=0.31), or TTP （r=0.235, P=0.35) and MVD. No correlation was found between PF （r=-0.208, P=0.45), PE （r=-0.251, P=0.37), TTP（r=-0.284, P=0.31), or BV（r=-0.472, P=0.09) and VEGF.Conclusion Blood volume can evaluate the angiogenesis of tumor and perfusion CT can be a tool to assess microvessel status in gastric antrum cancer.
Objective To investigate inter-observer reproducibility in the pathologic diagnosis of breast intraductal proliferative lesions (BDPL). Methods Forty three BDPL patients were diagnosed by criterion of Page. Every specimen from each case was sorted randomly. All slides were classified as mild usual hyperplasia, moderate-severe usual hyperplasia, mild atypical hyperplasia, moderate-severe atypical hyperplasia, ductal carcinoma in situ, or ductal carcinoma in situ with invasion. Inter-observer agreement of the two groups was statistically analyzed using Kappa test. Then we compared all the diagnoses of individual pathologist with the consensus opinion confirmed by two breast pathologists to analyze the diagnostic accuracy and undue diagnosis. Results Inter-observer reproducibility of the trial group was higher than that of the control group (The total K value of 6, 3, and 2 diagnoses in the two groups were 0.289 3, 0.337 1, 0.492 8, 0.100 3, 0.150 3 and 0.340 3, respectively). When the categories were simplified, inter-observer reproducibility increased. There were still undue diagnoses of different degrees among pathologists of the trial group. Conclusion Using the same criteria is an important method to increase the diagnostic reproducibility and accuracy. More practice is needed to familiarize with these criteria.