Objective To explore teaching effects of case-based learning (CBL) in abdominal physical examination in diagnostics. Methods Among 83 undergraduates in grade 2007 and in major of 8-year clinical medicine were randomly divided into two groups. Under the same conditions, 41 in the CBL group were taught with CBL method, while the other 42 in the control group were taught with traditional teaching method. Their scores in standard patient (SP) practice assessment of abdominal physical examination, examination of abnormal abdominal signs, ability to analyze and write medical records, and right answers to abdominal examination in final exam were compared. Meanwhile, questionnaire surveys were distributed to them after class. Results There was no significant difference between the two groups in the scores of SP practice assessment or medical record writing and analyzing, but the CBL group was obviously superior to the control group in the tests of abnormal abdominal signs and the right answers to abdominal examination in final exam (Plt;0.05). The questionnaire surveys revealed that the CBL group obviously scored higher in the following 3 items: increase the learning interest and commitment, strengthen the ability to analyze and solve problems, and improve the ability to combine theory and practice (Plt;0.05). Conclusion CBL method has an obvious advantage to improve the teaching quality in abdominal physical examination in diagnostics.
ObjectiveTo explore the teaching effects of case-based learning (CBL) as an educational strategy in digestive diseases module teaching. MethodsSixty-three oral and dental medical senior students were randomly divided into two groups during February to June 2012. Among them, 31 students were enrolled in the CBL group accepting CBL teaching method based on certain cases, while the other 32 students were designated into the control group receiving traditional teaching method. Their scores in practice skill examination, analytical ability of medical records, module test scores and behavior observation results were compared. Questionnaire survey was performed for students in the CBL group. ResultsThere were no significant difference in scores of clinical practice skill examination and behavior observation results between the two groups (P>0.05). Students in the CBL group did significantly better in case analysis and module test scores (P<0.05). Questionnaire survey revealed that CBL method could significantly improve the learning interest, cultivate the ability to combine theory and practice, strengthen analytical skills and promote problem-solving abilities. The students were generally satisfied with the CBL teaching method. ConclusionCBL method has an obvious advantage in digestive diseases teaching.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effects of medical simulation (MST) combined with case-based learning (CBL) in training of trainee doctors in emergency department. MethodA total of 120 trainee doctors practicing in the emergency department between March 2008 and December 2014 were randomly divided into two groups:MST combined with CBL group and CBL group, who accepted MST combined with CBL training and merely CBL training, respectively. The training effects were evaluated in terms of theoretical knowledge, practical operation, comprehensive abilities of case analysis and questionnaire survey. The results were compared and analyzed with the t test. The P value less than 0.05 was a significant difference. ResultsTrainee doctors in MST combined with CBL group acquired higher scores in all of the indicators (P<0.05). ConclusionsMST combined with CBL is a feasible method and has a better effect in training of trainee doctors in Emergency Department.
ObjectiveTo explore the effect of case-based learning combined with scenario exercise on nosocomial infection prevention and control training.MethodsClinical nursing students who entered the Department of Western & Traditional Chinese Medicine between September 2018 and November 2019 were selected. These students entered in groups. According to the entry number, the groups were divided into trial group and control group by odd or even numbers. The two groups of nursing students were trained by the infection prevention and control nursing group of the department to prevent nosocomial infection on the first day of entering the department. The trial group adopted case-based learning combined with scenario exercise, while the control group adopted traditional lecture-based learning. The two groups were compared by hand hygiene compliance rate, hand hygiene accuracy rate, clinical waste classification and disposal accuracy rate, occupational exposure, nosocomial infection prevention and control assessment scores, and teaching method satisfaction.ResultsA total of 63 nursing students from 10 groups were enrolled. There were 32 students from 5 groups in the control group and 31 students from 5 groups in the trial group. The hand hygiene compliance rate (χ2=8.434, P=0.004), clinical waste classification and disposal accuracy rate (χ2=4.196, P=0.041), nosocomial infection prevention and control assessment scores (t=3.145, P=0.003) and satisfaction scores of teaching methods (t=2.446, P=0.017) in the trial group were all higher than those in the control group. There was no occupational exposure in the trial group, but 1 case in the control group. The correct hand hygiene rates of the two groups were both 100%.ConclusionCase-based learning combined with scenario exercise can effectively improve the awareness of nosocomial infection prevention and control, improve the knowledge and skills of nosocomial infection prevention and control, improve the effectiveness of nosocomial infection prevention and control training, and increase the satisfaction of clinical teaching.