Objective To explore teaching effects of case-based learning (CBL) in abdominal physical examination in diagnostics. Methods Among 83 undergraduates in grade 2007 and in major of 8-year clinical medicine were randomly divided into two groups. Under the same conditions, 41 in the CBL group were taught with CBL method, while the other 42 in the control group were taught with traditional teaching method. Their scores in standard patient (SP) practice assessment of abdominal physical examination, examination of abnormal abdominal signs, ability to analyze and write medical records, and right answers to abdominal examination in final exam were compared. Meanwhile, questionnaire surveys were distributed to them after class. Results There was no significant difference between the two groups in the scores of SP practice assessment or medical record writing and analyzing, but the CBL group was obviously superior to the control group in the tests of abnormal abdominal signs and the right answers to abdominal examination in final exam (Plt;0.05). The questionnaire surveys revealed that the CBL group obviously scored higher in the following 3 items: increase the learning interest and commitment, strengthen the ability to analyze and solve problems, and improve the ability to combine theory and practice (Plt;0.05). Conclusion CBL method has an obvious advantage to improve the teaching quality in abdominal physical examination in diagnostics.
Objective To explore the teaching effects of problem-based learning (PBL) in diagnostic practice teaching. Methods A total of 32 students enrolled into PBL group adopted the PBL teaching method based on certain cases in some sections while the other 210 students into the control group adopted the traditional teaching method. Their scores in the theory, the practice skill examination and the evaluation of the analytical ability of the medical records were compared. A questionnaire survey was measured in PBL group after class. Results There was no significant difference in scores of theory and practice skill examination in the two groups. The questionnaire survey revealed that the PBL method could improve the learning interest, independent study, b communication, analytical skills, and team spirit. However, there were defects in systematization of imparting knowledge. Conclusion The PBL method has an obvious advantage in diagnostic practice teaching.
Objective To explore the strategies of improving the teaching quality of complete physical examination in diagnostics. Methods A total of 314 medical students' surveys relating to contents and skills of complete physical examination in Diagnostics were accomplished. Problems in the teaching quality of the complete physical examination were selected and countermeasures were determined by analyzing scores and performance of students. Results Among 192 items in a complete physical examination, students mastered poorly in 77 (40.1%) items, and especially poorly in 14. Skills of a comprehensive physical examination, including examination without repetition, inversion, omission and skills of palpation and percussion, were difficult to acquire. Conclusion It is helpful to improve the teaching quality of a complete physical examination by analyzing the problems in the physical examination to formulate the teaching objectives and optimize teaching methods.
ObjectiveTo explore the present national status of diagnostic teaching as well as to investigate the opinions on teaching operation such as overall course planning, so as to provide references for the formulation of national diagnostic teaching standard in the future.MethodsSelf-made questionnaires were adopted to carry out an anonymous survey among the teachers from 50 different medical colleges and universities who worked on diagnostic teaching throughout the country from October 2016 to September 2017.ResultsA total of 100 teachers were investigated. The diagnostic teaching departments where 59 respondents worked in were formed by a few fixed teachers plus teachers in rotation. The requirement of rotation time as well as the setting up of lecture-internship ratio in each school were quite various. Forty-seven respondents agreed that the ideal lecture-internship ratio should be internship more than lecture. As for the instruments of clinical skill room, only 40% of the respondents agreed that their diagnostic departments were equipped with a steady standardized patient (SP) team, which was also the reason why SP teaching was the least utilized teaching method during internship (47%). The respondents had various opinions on whether the final exam should weigh more than 50% in the subject score. Above these, the planning and expectations of the respondents on diagnostic course were mostly in consensus.ConclusionsThe development of diagnostic course including teaching staff, teaching content and teaching condition, etc. among each medical colleges and universities was not balanced. It’s quite necessary to formulate a unified and reasonable standard to normalize the teaching staff constitution, teaching planning and set-up as well as teaching condition so as to guarantee the teaching quality.