Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of enteral immunonutrition for patients with acute pancreatitis. Methods The randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about enteral immunonutrition for patients with acute pancreatitis were searched in following databases: PubMed (1966 to August 2012), MEDLINE (Ovid, 1946 to August 2012), CENTRAL (Issue 3, 2012), CBM (1978 to August 2012), CNKI (1979 August 2012), VIP (1989 to August 2012), and WanFang Data (1977 to August 2012). The relevant materials and each reference of literature were also searched manually. Two reviewers independently screened the literature according to the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted the data and assessed the quality, and then the meta-analysis was conducted by using RevMan 5.0 software. Results A total of 6 RCTs involving 197 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that there were no significant differences between the enteral immunonutrition group and the routine enteral nutrition group in following aspects: infectious complications and mortality rate, length of stay, level of C-reactive protein and numeration of leucocyte after treatment, and APACHE II score. Conclusion At present, no evidence shows enteral immunutrition is superior to routine enteral nutrition in acute pancreatitis. For the quantity and quality limitation of the included studies, more high-quality and large-sample RCTs are required to investigate the proper ingredients and dosage of enteral immunonutrition suitable for patients with acute pancreatitis.
Objective To explore the effect of different nutrition on the immune function of patients with colorectal cancer. Methods A total of 640 colorectal cancer patients were randomized into the enteral nutrition and peripheral nutrition groups. The peripheral venous blood was sampled before operation and on the postoperative days 1 and 7 to determine the serum levels of IgG, IgA, IgM, the percentage of T lymph cell subgroups CD3, CD4, CD4/CD8 and CRP, PGE, α- antitrypsin etc. The patient’s general condition, side-effects, and complications were observed intimately after surgery. Results Compared with the control group, the IgG, IgA, IgM, CD3, CD4,CD4/CD8 levels of the trial group on postoperative day 7 were higher. But the levels of CRP, PGE, α- antitrypsin were decreased. Hospitalization time and anal exsufflation time were shorter as well. There was no significant difference in either the general conditions or complications between the two groups. Conclusion Application of enteral nutrition after colorectal cancer surgery is safe, ,effective, and can improve the patient’s immune function and prognosis.
ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical advantages of enteral nutrition (EN) for acute pancreatitis（AP）comparing with parenteral nutrition (PN) and its prospect. MethodsLiteratures using MESH Browser in Medline were collected and reviewed. ResultsBeing of much higher cost and complications, total parenteral nutrition (TPN) ever regarded as most importantly for AP nutritional support, is now challenged by EN. Clinical evidence suggests enteral (jejunal) nutrition may diminish intestinal permeability to endotoxin and diminish bacterial translocation, thus reducing the cytokine drive to the generalized inflammatory response and preventing organ dysfunction, as well as achieving “pancreatic rest” equivalent to the TPN. Conclusion Early enteral nutrition should be used preferentially for patients with severe acute pancreatitis without paralytic ileus.
To study the effects of early enteral nutrition and selective decontamination of digestive tract on the lipopolysacchride (LPS) translocation and cytokines and the developing of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS). Thirty six rabbits were divided into 3 groups: ①control group (CON group, n＝12), the rabbits were bled to shock state (MAP was 5.33 kPa) for 1 hour and then were resuscitated by with replacement of the lost blood and 2 volume of the equilibrium liquid, ②selective decontamination of digestive tract (SDD group, n＝12), the procedure was the same as the CON group but the rabbit was fed with the antibiotics 3 days before the experiment and all through the experiment, ③early enteral nutrition group (EN group, n＝12), treatment was the same as CON group. After resuscitation the feeding tube was placed into the stomach for enteral nutrition. On the 1st, 3rd, 5th and 7th day the blood samples were taken for testing the LPS, TNFα and the organs’ function. Results: The MODS incidence, the levels of LPS and TNFα of the EN group were obviously lower than those in SDD and CON groups; the levels of the LPS and TNFα of the SDD group remained high in the 5th day. SDD group had a higher incidence of the MODS and mortality than that of the EN group. Conclusion: Ischemiareperfusion damage can produce the LPS translocation, which causes the development of MODS. SDD can’t decrease the LPS translocation so that the incidence of MODS and mortality remain high. Early EN can inhibit LPS translocation and reduce the development of MODS.
To evaluate the feasibility, safety and effectiveness of enteral nutrition (EN) via jejunostomy in the early postoperative period in patients with acute hemorrhagic necrotizing pancreatitis (AHNP), 38 patients were divided into the early group (start EN 3 or 4 days after operation) and the later group (start EN 7 days after operation). All patients received parenteral nutrition at first, then were transited to EN. The enteral nutrition liquid was transfused by continuous drip via jejunostomy in both groups. Levels of serum amylase, blood glucose, as well as the liver function were used as indices of tolerance. Symptoms and physical signs of abdominal pain as well as the level of serum albumin were used as the indices of effectieness. Patients tolerated the therapy well in both groups. Moreover, they enjoyed an earlier correction of hypoalbuminemia with more quickly improved serum albumin and no abdominal pain. Starting enteral nutrition in the early postoperative period is feasible, safe and efficacious for acute hemorrhagic necrotizing pancreatitis patients. It plays an important role in treating AHNP and improving curing rate.
Objective To study the manageable methods, effect of early use of enteral nutrition after operations on esophageal cancer patients. Methods By different way of nutritional support after operation, 209 cases of esophageal cancer were divided into two groups in which enteral nutrition（EN） group,146 cases, were managed with early use of nutritional support through intestine and parenteral nutrition（PN） group, 63 cases, were given nutrition by way of veins. Complications, general recovery and blood biochemical criteria after operation between those two groups were compared. Results No cases of anastomotic fistula occurred in the two groups. The incidence of complications in EN group was significantly lower than that in PN group（P〈0.01）, and the occurrence of diarrhea was higher in EN group （P=0. 000）. The time needed for recovery of bowel sounds, anal exsufflation, defecation and hospital stay was shorter and hospital fee lower in EN group than those in PN group（P=0. 000）. The total amount of gastrointestinal and closed thoracic drainages decreased more significantly in EN group （P= 0. 000） and the value of albumin, globulin and total protein was significantly higher also in EN group （P = 0. 000）. But the amount of BUN, creatinine and neutrophil was significantly lower in EN group （P = 0. 000）. Conclusion Early use of enteral nutrition after operation on esophageal cancer is safe, effective and practical, with more significant advantages than those of parenteral nutrition.
Objective To explore the protective effect of early enteral nutrition on intestinal mucosa barrier in patients with esophageal carcinoma after operation. Methods Fifty six patients with esophageal carcinoma whose weight decreased more than 20% before operation in three months were divided into enteral nutrition group ( n =30) and parenteral nutrition group ( n =26). Plasma concentration of lipopolysaccharide(LPS), tumor necrosis factor (TNF), gastrin, glutamine, and ratio of lactulose and mannitol (L/M) were measured on the 1st, 4th, 8th day after operation respectively. Results Weight loss and infectious complication in enteral nutrition group were less than those in parenteral nutrition group after operation ( P lt;0.01, 0.05). On the 4th and 8th day after operation,the level of LPS,TNF, and L/M were lower in enteral nutrition group than those in parenteral nutrition group ( P lt;0 01), the values of gastrin and glutamine were higher in enteral nutrition group than those in parente...更多ral nutrition group ( P lt;0 01). Conclusion Enteral nutrition can protect the intestinal mucosa barrier and decrease infectious complication after operation.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of early enteral nutrition (EN) versus total parenteral nutrition (TPN) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Methods Such databases as MEDLINE, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CBM, VIP, CNKI were electronically searched to collect the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about EN versus TPN after PD published from 2000 to March 2010. The quality of the included trials was assessed according to the inclusive and exclusive criteria, and the data were extracted and analyzed by using RevMan 5.0 software. Results A total of 4 RCTs involving 322 PD patients were included. The meta-analysis showed that the EN (the treatment group) was superior to the TPN (the control group) in the average postoperative hospital stay (MD= –2.34, 95%CI –3.91 to –0.77, Plt;0.05), the total incidence rate of complication (RR=0.75, 95%CI 0.57 to 0.99, P=0.04), the recovery time of enterocinesia (MD= –29.87, 95%CI –33.01 to –26.73, Plt;0.05) and the nutrition costs (MD= –30.51, 95%CI –35.78 to –25.24, Plt;0.05); there were no differences in mortality (RR=0.23, 95%CI 0.03 to 2.03, P=0.19), pancreatic leakage (RR=0.78, 95%CI 0.45 to 1.35, P=0.38), infectious complications (RR=0.71, 95%CI 0.43 to 1.18, P=0.19), non-infectious complications (RR=0.78, 95%CI 0.5 1 to 1.20, P=0.26) and postoperative serum albumin level (MD= –0.79, 95%CI –2.84 to 1.27, P=0.45). Conclusion Compared with total parenteral nutrition, the enteral nutrition used earlier after pancreatoduodenectomy shows significant advantages. But more reasonably-designed and double blind RCTs with large scale are expected to provide high quality proof.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of total enteral nutrition (TEN) versus total parenteral nutrition (TPN) in patients with severe acute pancreatitis (SAP). Methods The databases such as Pubmed (1996 to June 2011), EMbase (1984 to June 2011), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials of The Cochrane Library (Issue 6, 2011) and CBM (1978 to June 2011) were electronically searched, and the relevant references of the included papers were also manually searched. Two reviewers independently screened the trials according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted the data, and assessed the methodology quality. Meta-analyses were performed using the Cochrane Collaboration’s RevMan 5.1 software. Results Seven randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 379 patients with SAP were included. The results of meta-analyses showed that compared with TPN, TEN could significantly reduce the risk of mortality (RR=0.33, 95%CI 0.20 to 0.55, Plt;0.000 1), pancreatitis-related infections (RR=0.35, 95%CI 0.25 to 0.50, Plt;0.000 01), required rate of surgical intervention (RR=0.43, 95%CI 0.23 to 0.82, P=0.01), and incidence of multiple organ failure (MOF) (RR=0.28, 95%CI 0.17 to 0.46, Plt;0.000 01). There was no significant difference in the nutrition strategies associated complications between TPN and TEN (RR=1.16, 95%CI 0.42 to 3.22, P=0.78). Conclusion Meta-analyses show that compared with TPN, TEN can reduce the risk of mortality, pancreatitis-related infections, required rate of surgical intervention, and incidence of MOF; and it will not increase the nutrition strategies associated complications. Consequently, TEN should be considered a better choice for SAP patients as early as possible.
Objective To evaluate the clinical curative effect of early enteral nutrition （EN） in gastric cancer patients after operation and its safety. Methods One hundred and eighty patients with gastric cancer diagnosed and underwent surgical treatment in gastrointestinal surgery center， West China Hospital from February 2011 to December 2011 were studied prospectively， who were randomly divided into EN group （n=91） and parenteral nutrition （PN） group （n=89）. The nutrition state， rehabilitation， hospital stay， cost of nutrition in hospital， and complications were observed. Results ①According to the postoperative serum nutrition index， there were no significant differences in the prealbumin， hemoglobin， and ratio of albumin to globulin in two groups （P＞0.05）， but the albumin level in the EN group was significantlyhigher than that in the PN group （P=0.047）. ②According to the postoperative rehabilitation index， the first ambulation time （P=0.011）， first intake time （P=0.000）， first nasogastric tube away time （P=0.013）， first drainage tube away time （P=0.021）， and first urinary catheter away time （P=0.002） in the EN group were significantly shorter than those in the PN group. The difference of the first anus exhaust time was not statistically significant in two groups （P=0.083）. ③The cost of nutrition in hospital in the EN group was significantly less than that in the PN group （P=0.017）. The postoperative hospital stay and total complication rate were not significant differences in two groups （P＞0.05）. Conclusion Early postoperative EN is effective， economic， practical， which might be superior to PN.