Objective To compare the short-term effectiveness between dynamic neutralization system (Dynesys) and posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease. Methods The clinical data were retrospectively analyzed, from 14 patients undergoing Dynesys and 18 patients undergoing PLIF to treat lumbar degenerative disease between February 2009 and March 2011. No significant difference in gender, age, duration of disease, and lesion segments was found between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). The visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Oswestry disability index (ODI), and radiographic results were compared between 2 groups at preoperation and last follow-up. Results Thirty-one cases were followed up 12-21 months (mean, 17 months). No internal fixation loosening, broken screws, and broken rods was found during follow-up. The mean interbody fusion time was 15 months (range, 13-19 months) in PLIF group. The VAS score and ODI were significantly improved in 2 groups at last follow-up when compared with the preoperative ones (P lt; 0.05); but there was no signficant difference between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). Imaging assessment: the range of motion (ROM) of operated segment in PLIF group was (0.1 ± 0.4)° at last follow-up, showing significant difference when compared with preoperative ROM (7.8 ± 0.6)° (t=28.500, P=0.004); the ROM in Dynesys group (5.0 ± 1.5)° decreased, but showing no significant difference when compared with preoperative ROM (7.5 ± 0.8)° (t=0.480, P=0.113); and significant difference was found between 2 groups (t=5.260, P=0.008) at last follow-up. The ROM of adjacent segment in Dynesys group at last follow-up (7.2 ± 0.7)° decreased when compared with preoperative ROM (7.3 ± 1.8)°, but showing no significant difference (t=0.510, P=0.108); however, ROM of adjacent segment in PLIF group (8.7 ± 0.4)° increased significantly when compared with preoperative ROM (7.0 ± 1.6)°, showing signifcant difference (t=3.440, P=0.042); and there was significant difference between 2 groups (t= — 2.100, P=0.047) at last follow-up. Conclusion Dynesys and PLIF have equivalent short-term effectivness in the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease. However, the Dynesys could retain ROM of operated segment without increased ROM of the adjacent segment, which will promote the disc recovery of operated segment and prevent degeneration of adjacent segment.
Objective To investigate the effectiveness of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) assisted with microscope for lumbar degenerative disease. Methods Retrospective analysis was made on the clinical data of 82 patients with lumbar degenerative disease (minimally invasive group) undergoing minimally invasive TLIF assisted with microscope between January 2010 and June 2011, which was compared with those of 76 patients (traditional group) undergoing traditional open TLIF. There was no significant difference in age, gender, disease duration, disease type, lesion level, preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS), and preoperative Oswestry disability index (ODI) between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). The perioperative related parameters, radiography index, and effectiveness were documented and compared. Results There was no significant difference in operation time and intraoperative radiological exposure time between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05), but intraoperative blood loss and postoperative drainage volume in the minimally invasive group were significantly less than those in the traditional group (P lt; 0.05). Dural tear occurred in 2 patients of the traditional group. Superficial infection of incision occurred in 1 case in each group, respectively; and primary healing of incision was obtained in the other patients. All patients were followed up 12-28 months (mean, 18 months). No failure of internal fixation occurred. Radiological analysis showed that the bone graft fusion rate was 96.1% (73/76) in the traditional group and 95.1% (78/82) in the minimally invasive group at last follow-up, showing no significant difference (χ2= 0.012 2, P= 0.912 0). The postoperative ODI and VAS score were significantly improved when compared with preoperative ones in 2 groups (P lt; 0.05); the ODI of the minimally invasive group were significantly better than those of the traditional group at 3 months (t= — 11.941 1, P=0.000 0), and the VAS score of the minimally invasive group was significantly lower than that of the traditional group at 1 day and 3 months (P lt; 0.05); but no significant difference was found in ODI and VAS score between 2 groups at 1 year and last follow-up (P gt; 0.05). Conclusion Minimally invasive TLIF is an effective method to treat lumbar degenerative disease. This procedure is safe and reliable because it has less injury, less blood loss, and milder pain than the traditional open TLIF, and the short-term effectiveness is comparable in 2 procedures.
Objective To compare the difference of traumatic related index in serum and its significance between minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) and open TLIF. Methods Sixty patients were enrolled by the entry criteria between May and November 2012, and were divided into MIS-TLIF group (n=30) and open TLIF group (n=30). There was no significant difference in gender, age, type of lesions, disease segment, and disease duration between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative hospitalization time were recorded, and the pain severity of incision was evaluated by visual analog scale (VAS). The serum levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) and creatine kinase (CK) were measured at preoperation and at 24 hours postoperatively. The levels of interleukin 6 (IL-6), IL-10, and tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) in serum were measured at preoperation and at 2, 4, 8, and 24 hours after operation. Results The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative hospitalization time of MIS-TLIF group were significantly smaller than those of open TLIF group (P lt; 0.05), and the VAS score for incision pain in MIS-TLIF group was significantly lower than that of open TLIF group at 1, 2, and 3 days after operation (P lt; 0.05). The levels of CRP, CK, IL-6, and IL-10 in MIS-TLIF group were significantly lower than those in open TLIF group at 24 hours after operation (P lt; 0.05), but there was no significant difference between 2 groups before operation (P gt; 0.05). No significant difference was found in TNF-α level between 2 groups at pre- and post-operation (P gt; 0.05). Conclusion Compared with the open-TLIF, MIS-TLIF may significantly reduce tissue injury and systemic inflammatory reactions during the early postoperative period.
ObjectiveTo investigate the short-term effectiveness of ISOBAR TTL semi-rigid dynamic stabilization system (ISOBAR TTL system) in treatment of lumbar degenerative disease. MethodsBetween June 2007 and May 2011, 38 cases of lumbar degenerative disease were treated, including 24 males and 14 females with an average age of 51.2 years (range, 21-67 years). The disease duration was 8 months to 10 years (mean, 4.7 years). In 38 cases, there were 4 cases of grade I spondylolisthesis, 11 cases of lumbar instability and lumbar disc protrusion, 21 cases of lumbar spinal stenosis and lumbar disc protrusion, and 2 cases of postoperative recurrence of lumbar disc protrusion. There were 22 cases of adjacent segment disc degeneration. All cases underwent posterior decompression and implantation of ISOBAR TTL system. The double-segment-fixed patients underwent interbody fusion. Visual analogue scale (VAS) and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores for low back pain were used to evaluate clinical outcomes. The range of motion (ROM) at the semi-rigid dynamic stabilization segment was also measured. ResultsThe other cases achieved healing of incision by first intention, except 1 case of delayed healing. All the patients were followed up 8-53 months (mean, 27.8 months). After operation, ISOBAR TTL system showed reliable fixation, and no loosening, breakage, or kyphosis deformity occurred. No adjacent segment degeneration was observed. The ROM of the fixed segments was 0-1° in 3 cases, 1-2° in 4 cases, 2-3° in 14 cases, 3-4° in 15 cases, and gt; 4° in 2 cases. At last follow-up, the VAS score was 1.93 ± 2.43, and was significantly lower than preoperative score (8.20 ± 1.78) (t=7.761, P=0.000). JOA score was 23.06 ± 7.75, and was significantly higher than preoperative score (4.87 ± 3.44) (t=10.045, P=0.000). According to Stauffer-Coventry evaluation standard, the results were excellent in 32 cases, good in 3 cases, fair in 2 cases, and poor in 1 case, with an excellent and good rate of 92.1%. ConclusionGood short-term effectiveness can be achieved by surgical intervention with ISOBAR TTL system in treatment of lumbar degenerative disease.
ObjectiveTo investigate the role of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 in the posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for patients with osteoporosis and lumbar degenerative disease. MethodsBetween November 2011 and October 2012,44 patients with osteoporosis and lumbar degenerative disease were treated with TLIF and the clinical data were retrospectively analyzed.The patients were divided into 2 groups based on the administration of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3.After TLIF operation,1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 was used in 21 patients (trial group),and was not used in 23 patients (control group).There was no significant difference in gender,age,etiology,affected segment,and disease duration between 2 groups (P>0.05).Lumbar interbody fusion was observed by X-ray and thin-section CT scan reconstruction of lumbar spine according to Brantigan assessment system at 6 months after operation and last follow-up.Clinical outcome was evaluated by Oswestry disability index (ODI) before and after operation. ResultsThe patients of 2 groups were followed up 12-27 months (mean,14.5 months).No fixation loosening or breaking occurred during follow-up.ODI scores in both groups were significantly improved at 6 months after operation and last follow-up (P<0.05) when conpared with preoperative value.Although at preoperation there was no significant difference in ODI score between 2 groups (P>0.05),ODI score of trial group was significantly lower than that of control group at 6 months after operation and last follow-up (P<0.05).At 6 months after operation,the interbody fusion rate was 76.19% (16/21) in trial group and 43.48% (10/23) in control group,showing significant difference (χ2=3.60,P=0.03); at last follow-up,the fusion rate was 95.24% (20/21) in trial group and 65.22% (15/23) in control group,showing significant difference (χ2=4.38,P=0.02). Conclusion1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 can improve the lumbar interbody fusion rate and general conditions in the patients with osteoporosis and lumbar degenerative disease.
ObjectiveTo investigate the advantage and short- and medium-term effectivenesses of paramedian incision minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (mini-TLIF) by comparing with open TLIF. MethodsA retrospective analysis was made on the clinical data of 54 patients with single segmental lumbar degenerative disease who accorded with the inclusion criteria between January 2012 and March 2014. Open TLIF was performed in 26 patients (open group), mini-TLIF in 28 cases (minimally invasive group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, disease duration, etiology, and affected segments between 2 groups (P>0.05). The indexes of surgical trauma, systemic inflammatory response, clinical outcome, and interbody fusion rate were compared between 2 groups. ResultsDural rupture occurred in 1 case of open group, L5 nerve root injury in 1 case of minimally invasive group. All patients obtained primary healing of incision. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative drainage of minimally invasive group were significantly lower than those of open group (P<0.05). C-reactive protein, leucocyte count, and creatine kinase-MM (CK-MM) of open group were significantly higher than those of minimally invasive group at 24 hours after operation (P<0.05). At 7 days after operation, the CK-MM of minimally invasive group was significantly lower than that of open group (P<0.05), but no significant difference was found in C-reactive protein and leucocyte count between 2 groups (P>0.05). The follow-up time was 1.2-3.1 years in open group and 1.4-2.9 years in minimally invasive group. At 1 year after operation, the Oswestry disability index (ODI) and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores were significantly improved in 2 groups (P<0.05). Minimally invasive group was better than open group in ODI and VAS score of back pain (P<0.05), but VAS score of leg pain showed no significant difference (P>0.05). According to the Suk interbody fusion standard, solid fusion was obtained in 18 cases, probable fusion in 4 cases, and nonunion in 4 cases, and the fusion rate was 84.61% in open group; solid fusion was obtained in 21 cases, probable fusion in 3 cases, and nonunion in 4 cases, and the fusion rate was 85.71% in minimally invasive group; and the interbody fusion rates showed no significant difference between 2 groups (χ2=0.072, P=0.821). ConclusionCompared with open TLIF, paramedian incision mini-TLIF has advantages of minimal surgical trauma and little blood loss for single-level lumbar degenerative disease. The short- and medium-term effectivenesses are satisfactory.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the medium-term effectiveness of Waveflex system in the treatment of multiple lumbar degenerative diseases. MethodsBetween May 2010 and July 2012, 26 patients with multiple lumbar degenerative diseases underwent posterior decompression, transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), and internal fixation with Waveflex system. There were 15 males and 11 females, aged 23-65 years (mean, 34.2 years). The disease duration was 9 months to 8 years (median, 3 years and 3 months). The lesion located at L3-S1. The visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), and the short-form 36 health survey scale (SF-36) were used to evaluate the status of clinical recovery, meanwhile the Stauffer-Coventry evaluation standard was used to access the satisfaction at last followup; the disc space height (DSH), intervertebral angle (IVA), and range of motion (ROM) were measured on X-ray film or three-dimensional CT, and the adjacent segment degeneration was classified by Pfirrmann score based on MRI findings. ResultsAll patients obtained primary incision healing without nerve injury, cerebrospinal fluid leakage, or internal fixation failure. All patients were followed up 31-50 months (mean, 40.6 months). The VAS, ODI, and SF-36 scores were significantly improved at 6 months after operation and last follow-up when compared with preoperative ones (P<0.05), but no significant difference was found between at 6 months and last follow-up (P>0.05). According to the StaufferCoventry evaluation standard, the results were excellent in 21 cases, good in 2 cases, moderate in 2 cases, and poor in 1 case, with an excellent and good rate of 88.5% at last follow-up. X-ray films showed that there was no complication of screws pulling-out or fixed rod rupture and displacement. At 7 days, 6 months, and last follow-up, the DSH of adjacent segment was significantly increased (P<0.05), and the ROM of adjacent segment was significantly decreased (P<0.05) when compared with preoperative ones; there was no significant difference in IVA between at pre-and post-operation (P>0.05). According to Brantigan grade for fusion, 19 cases were rated as grade E, 6 cases as grade D, and 1 case as grade C, and the fusion rate was 96%. There was no significant difference in Pfirrmann score between at pre-operation and last follow–up (Z=0.000, P=1.000). ConclusionThe Waveflex system combined with TLIF is effective and safe to treat multiple lumbar degenerative diseases during medium-term follow-up.
Objective To investigate the effectiveness of direct lateral interbody fusion (DLIF) for lumbar degenerative diseases. Methods A retrospective study was done on 25 cases of lumbar degenerative diseases treated with DLIF between May 2013 and May 2014. There were 15 males and 10 females with an average age of 61.4 years (range, 36-78 years), including 14 cases of lumbar disc herniation, 2 cases of degenerative lumbar scoliosis, 3 cases of lumbar spondylolisthesis, and 6 cases of lumbar instability with spinal stenosis. The disease duration was 8 months to 20 years (mean, 5.7 years). The involved segments included L4, 5 in 10 cases, L3, 4 in 6 cases, L2, 3 in 2 cases, L2-4 in 2 cases, L3-5 in 3 cases, and L2-5 in 2 cases. The operation time, intraoperative bleeding volume, postoperative hospitalization time, and complications were recorded. The visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) criteria were used to assess the effectiveness; X-ray film and CT were used to evaluate the bone fusion. Results The mean operation time was 105 minutes (range, 85-155 minutes), and mean intraoperative bleeding volume was 158 mL (range, 80-300 mL). The postoperative hospitalization time was 2-5 days (mean, 3.2 days). All incisions healed by first intension. There was no complication of wound infection, vascular injuries, or intraoperative visceral injuries. All cases were followed up 24.6 months on average (range, 18-30 months). Four cases had iliopsoas weakness, 5 cases had iliopsoas weakness and anterior thigh hypoesthesia, which disappeared within 6 months after operation. No retrograde ejaculation, Cage displacement, or loosening was found after operation. Full bony fusion was observed in 20 segments and partial bony fusion in 12 segments. The mean bony fusion time was 10.8 months (mean, 6-18 months). The height of intervertebral space was significantly increased to (11.98±1.20) mm at 2 days after operation and to (11.80±1.33) mm at last follow-up from preoperative (6.20±0.88) mm (P < 0.05), but no significant difference was found between at 2 days and last follow-up (P > 0.05). At last follow-up, VAS score was significantly decreased to 3.43±0.53 from preoperative 8.26±0.49 (t=26.275, P=0.000), and ODI was significantly decreased to 15.41%±3.91% from preoperative 40.80%±3.10% (t=22.902, P=0.000). Conclusion DLIF is a safe and effective treatment for lumbar degenerative diseases, which has the advantages of less tissue damage, less blood loss, and fast rehabilitation.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the effectiveness and safety of dynamic neutralization system (Dynesys) versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) for lumbar degenerative disease. MethodsDatabases including PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library (Issue 5, 2016), CNKI, CBM, VIP and WanFang Data were searched to collect studies about Dynesys versus PLIF for lumbar degenerative disease from inception to May 31st 2016. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and evaluated the methodological quality of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. ResultsA total of 22 studies involving 1 482 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that, compared with PLIF, Dynesys could reduce operative time (MD=-29.62, 95%CI -36.67 to -22.57), operative blood loss (MD=-112.10, 95%CI -130.60 to -93.61), length of hospital stay (MD=-2.62, 95%CI -4.96 to -0.28), postoperative adjacent segment ROM (MD=-1.29, 95%CI -1.72 to -0.86) and maintain postoperative operated segment ROM (MD=3.53, 95%CI 1.99 to 5.08). There were no significant differences between two groups in postoperative ODI (MD=-1.51, 95%CI -3.58 to 0.55), postoperative back VAS (MD=-0.15, 95%CI -0.38 to 0.08), postoperative leg VAS (MD=-0.09, 95%CI -0.22 to 0.04) and postoperative complications (OR=0.69, 95%CI 0.45 to 1.06). ConclusionThe current evidence shows that compared with PLIF, Dynesys for lumbar degenerative disease has shorter operative time, less operative blood loss, shorter hospitalization days, and Dynesys can also maintain operated segment ROM and delay the degeneration of adjacent segment. Due to the limited quality of the included studies, more studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.
Objective To explore the relationship between imbalance in sagittal plane as well as structural factors and lumbar degenerative disease. Methods Patients diagnosed between July 2012 and May 2015 were divided into 4 groups according to corresponding diagnostic criteria: lumbar disc herniation group (LDH), lumbar disc protrusion group (LDP), degenerative lumbar spondylisthesis group (DLS) and nonspecific low back pain group (NLBP); 40 patients were included in each group according to their visiting time. All patients underwent X-ray, CT, and MRI. Sagittal parameters and evaluate degeneration level of structural factors were measured, and the difference among the groups were analyzed. Results There was statistical significance in differences of pelvic incidence (PI) and lumbar lordosis (LL) among 4 groups (P<0.05). Average PI was followed in descending order: DLS, LDP, NLBP, and LDH; average LL was followed in descending order: DLS, NLBP, LDP, and LDH. There was no statistical differences in sacral slope and pelvic tilting among 4 groups (P>0.05). The difference in the level of lumbar disc degeneration between NLBP group (which had slightest lumbar disc degeneration) and the other groups was significant (P<0.001) while no statistical differences in level and rate of lumbar disc degeneration among the other three groups was found (P>0.05). As to the level of lumbar zygapophyseal joint degeneration, there was statistical differences between NLBP group (which had the lowest level of lumbar zygapophyseal joint degeneration) and the other groups (P<0.001) while no statistical differences in the grade of lumbar zygapophyseal joint degeneration among the other three groups (P>0.05). There was statistical differences in the rate of lumbar zygapophyseal joint degeneration between LDH and DLS group (χ2=11.429,P=0.001). Conclusions Vertical lunbar spine is combined with LDH of which the level of lumbar zygapophyseal joint degeneration is minimized, while crooked lunbar spine is combined with DLS of which the level of lumbar zygapophyseal joint degeneration is maximization. NLBP has the lowest level of degeneration of lumbar disc and lumbar zygapophyseal joint degeneration.