Objective To observe the visual acuity change in patients with different patterns of optical coherence tomography (OCT) of diabetic macular edema (DME) after intravitreal ranibizumab injection and/or laser photocoagulation. Methods A retrospective observational case series. Seventy patients (99 eyes) with DME were enrolled. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was evaluated using the international vision test chart, and then convert the result to the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR). According to the morphological characteristics of OCT, the DME was divided into 3 patterns, including diffuse macular edema (DRT), cystoid macular edema (CME) and serous neuroepithelial layer detachment. The average follow-up was (80.43±74.89) days. The patients were divided into 3 groups according to the different treatments, including intravitreal ranibizumab injection group (group A, 21 patients, 25 eyes), intravitreal ranibizumab injection and laser photocoagulation group (group B, 23 patients, 26 eyes), laser photocoagulation group (group C, 26 patients, 48 eyes). The changes of absolute BCVA (ABCVA) and improved visual acuity were compared between different treatment groups and different OCT patterns. ABCVA = logMAR BCVA before treatment－logMAR BCVA after treatment. Improvement more than 0.3 of logMAR value was considered as improved visual acuity. Results There was no significant difference in ABCVA between different treatment groups (F=0.050,P＞0.05). The improved visual acuity in group A and B were great than group C (χ2=5.645, 6.301;P＜0.05). In group A, B and C, there was no significant difference in ABCVA and improved visual acuity between different OCT patterns (P＞0.05). Improved visual acuity of DRT and CME eyes were higher in group A&B (70.59% and 50.00%) than in group C (26.47% and 14.29%), the difference was statistically significant (χ2=5.075, 4.453;P＜0.05). Conclusions There is no obvious change of visual acuity in patients with different OCT patterns of DME after the same treatment by intravitreal ranibizumab injection and/or laser photocoagulation. The improved visual acuity is not consistent in same OCT patterns after different treatment.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of repeated intravitreal conbercept injection in patients with macular edema (ME) of retinal vein occlusion (RVO), guided by optic coherence tomography (OCT). Methods It is a retrospective case study. Forty patients (40 eyes) diagnosed as ME secondary to RVO were enrolled in this study. There were 19 males (19 eyes) and 21 females (21 eyes), with the mean age of (53.58±13.19) years and the mean course of 1.5 months. The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), indirect ophthalmoscopy, fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) and OCT were performed. The mean baseline of BCVA, central macular thickness (CMT) were 0.25±0.18 and (509.48±170.13) μm respectively. All the patients were treated with 10.00 mg/ml conbercept 0.05 ml (including conbercept 0.5 mg). Follow-up of these patients was 1 to 6 months after treatments, the BCVA, fundus manifestations, OCT were retrospectively observed by every month, the FFA was retrospectively observed by every 3 months. When there was retinal edema or CMT ≥50 μm by OCT during follow-up, those patients were retreated with intravitreal conbercept injection. The changes of the BCVA, CMT were evaluated before and after treatment. Meanwhile, complications in eyes related to medicine and treatment methods were evaluated too. Results At the 6 months, the BCVA was improved (increase≥2 lines) in 25 eyes (62.50%), stabilized (±1 line) in 13 eyes (32.50%) and decreased 2 lines in 2 eyes (5.00%). Retinal hemorrhage and exudates were absorbed in most patients. FFA showed no fluorescein leakage in 11 eyes (27.50%), minor fluorescein leakage in 26 eyes (65.00%), and retinal capillary non-perfusion in 3 eyes (7.50%). OCT showed absorption of the subretinal fluid. The mean CMT were (235.20±100.44) μm at 6 months. Intravitreal injection of conbercept was applied for 4 times in 8 eyes (20.00%), 3 times for 18 eyes (45.00%), and 2 times for 14 eyes (35.00%). The mean number of intravitreal injection was 2.85 times. There were no ocular or systemic adverse events observed in all patients. Conclusion Intravitreal conbercept injection is an efficacy and safe treatment for the patients with ME of RVO guided by OCT. It can stabilize and improve the visual acuity.
Pharmaceutical therapy, including anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment and intravitreal corticosteroids, is the most common treatment for branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) and its complications, however there are confusing ideas about the protocol, patient selection, timing and endpoint of this treatment. The disease is easy to relapse with these drugs therapy. Collateral vessel formation was found in patients receiving intravitreal injection of ranibizumab or triamcinolone for BRVO and secondary macular edema. The mechanism of collateral vessel formation has not been carefully investigated. In the past thrombolysis, arteriovenous fasciostomy and laser choroidal retinal vascular anastomosis were used to reconstruct the retinal circulation, but their rationality, effectiveness and safety need to be further were studied. In recent years, because of the key technology is still immature, the artificial vascular bypass surgery experiment is not yet practical, but provides us a new idea worth looking forward to for the treatment of BRVO.
Objective To study and compare the clinical efficacy between intravitreal conbercept injection and (or) macular grid pattern photocoagulation in treating macular edema secondary to non-ischemic branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). Methods Ninety eyes of 90 patients diagnosed as macular edema secondary to non-ischemic BRVO were enrolled in this study. Forty-eight patients (48 eyes) were male and 42 patients (42 eyes) were female. The average age was (51.25±12.24) years and the course was 5–17 days. All patients were given best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure, slit lamp with preset lens, fluorescence fundus angiography (FFA) and optic coherent tomography (OCT) examination. The patients were divided into conbercept and laser group (group Ⅰ), laser group (group Ⅱ) and conbercept group (group Ⅲ), with 30 eyes in each group. The BCVA and central macular thickness (CMT) in the three groups at baseline were statistically no difference (F=0.072, 0.286;P=0.930, 0.752). Patients in group Ⅰ received intravitreal injection of 0.05 ml of 10.00 mg/ml conbercept solution (conbercept 0.5 mg), and macular grid pattern photocoagulation 3 days later. Group Ⅱ patients were given macular grid pattern photocoagulation. Times of injection between group Ⅰ and Ⅲ, laser energy between group Ⅰ and Ⅱ, changes of BCVA and CMT among 3 groups at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after treatment were compared. Results Patients in group Ⅰ and Ⅲ had received conbercept injections (1.20±0.41) and (2.23±1.04) times respectively, and 6 eyes (group Ⅰ) and 22 eyes (group Ⅲ) received 2-4 times re-injections. The difference of injection times between two groups was significant (P＜0.001). Patients in group Ⅱ had received photocoagulation (1.43±0.63) times, 9 eyes had received twice photocoagulation and 2 eyes had received 3 times of photocoagulation. The average laser energy was (96.05±2.34) μV in group Ⅰ and (117.41±6.85) μV in group Ⅱ, the difference was statistical significant (P=0.003). BCVA improved in all three groups at last follow-up. However, the final visual acuity in group Ⅰ and group Ⅲ were better than in group Ⅱ (t=4.607, –4.603;P＜0.001) and there is no statistical significant difference between group Ⅲ and group Ⅰ (t=–0.802,P=0.429). The mean CMT reduced in all three groups after treating for 1 week and 1 month, comparing that before treatment (t=–11.855, –10.620, –10.254;P＜0.001). There was no statistical difference of CMT between group Ⅰand Ⅲ at each follow up (t=0.404, 1.723, –1.819, –1.755;P=0.689, 0.096, 0.079, 0.900). CMT reduction in group Ⅰ was more than that in group Ⅱ at 1 week and 1 month after treatments (t=–4.621, –3.230;P＜0.001, 0.003). The CMT in group Ⅲ at 3 month after treatment had increased slightly comparing that at 1 month, but the difference was not statistically significant (t=1.995,P=0.056). All patients had no treatment-related complications, such as endophthalmitis, rubeosis iridis and retinal detachment. Conclusions Intravitreal conbercept injection combined with macular grid pattern photocoagulation is better than macular grid pattern photocoagulation alone in treating macular edema secondary to non-ischemic BRVO. Combined therapy also reduced injection times comparing to treatment using conbercept injection without laser photocoagulation.
Objective To observe the efficacy of intravitreal injection of ranibizumab (IVR) for different patterns of optical coherence tomography (OCT) of diabetic macular edema and the relationship between integrity of ellipsoidal zone and visual acuity outcomes. Methods Eighty-five IVR treated eyes were enrolled. The examination of BCVA was according to Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study, and the results were recorded as logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR). Frequency-domain OCT was used to measure the central foveal thickness (CFT) and the integrity of ellipsoidal zone. All eyes were classified as diffuse macular edema (DRT group, 31 eyes), cystoid macular edema (CME group, 29 eyes), and serous retinal detachment (SRD group, 25 eyes). All the patients were treated with intravitreal injection of 0.05 ml (0.5 mg) ranibizumab. The mean follow-up time was (9.21+3.56) months after IVR treatment. The changes of BCVA and CFT in 3 groups were compared and analyzed after 3, 6 and 12 months. According to visual acuity at different ranges, the relationship between integrity of ellipsoidal zone and BCVA was analyzed. Results Compared with the average logMAR BCVA before treatment, except for 12 months after treatment in group SRD (t=2.104,P=0.053), the average logMAR BCVA after IVR at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months improved in DRT group (t=7.847, 6.771, 6.426;P=0.000, 0.000, 0.000), CME group (t=8.560, 6.680, 5.082;P=0.000, 0.000, 0.000) and SRD group (t=5.161, 3.968, 2.104;P=0.000, 0.001, 0.053). The average logMAR BCVA of the DRT group was lesser than that in CME and SRD group after 12 months treatment (t=–2.043, –3.434;P=0.030, 0.001). The average CFT after IVR at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months reduced significantly in DRT group (t=12.746, 10.687, 9.425;P=0.000, 0.000, 0.000), CME group (t=13.400, 11.460, 10.169;P=0.000, 0.000, 0.000), and SRD group (t=11.755, 10.100, 9.173;P=0.000, 0.000, 0.000). After 12 months of treatment, the average CFT of the SRD group was thicker than that in DRT group and CME group (t=–3.251, –1.227;P=0.003, 0.025); there was significant difference in the integrity of ellipsoidal zone among 3 groups (χ2=1.267,P=0.531). The results showed that there were significant differences in the integrity of ellipsoidal zone with different ranges of BCVA before and after 12 months treatment (χ2=20.145, 41.035;P=0.000, 0.000). Conclusions IVR could significantly improve the visual acuity of different patterns of DME, reduced the CFT, and had the best efficacy in the DRT group. There was relationship between the integrity of ellipsoidal zone and the visual acuity outcomes.