Objective To explore the relationship between periodontitis and postmenopausal osteoporosis.Methods Databases were electronically searched from PubMed (1966 to December, 2010), EMbase (1974 to December, 2010), CBM (1978 to December, 2010), VIP (1989 to December, 2010), CNKI (1979 to December, 2010) and WanFang Data (January, 2007 to December, 2010), and the references listed in all papers were also retrieved. The literature was screened according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria by two reviewers independently; the methodology quality was evaluated after data abstraction; and then the RevMan 5.0 software was used for meta-analyses. Results Four trials were included. Among the total 678 patients involved, 263 were postmenopausal osteoporosis patients, while the other 415 were non-osteoporosis patients. The results of meta-analyses showed that: a) Clinical attachment loss (CAL) of the postmenopausal osteoporosis patients was significantly higher than that of the non-osteoporosis patients (WMD=0.60, 95%CI 0.23 to 0.96); b) The level of gingival recession of the postmenopausal osteoporosis patients was significantly higher than that of the non-osteoporosis patients (WMD=0.78, 95%CI 0.41 to 1.14); c) There were no significant differences in plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI) and periodontal probing depth (PPD) between the two groups (WMD=0.17, 95%CI 0.00 to 0.35; WMD=0.05, 95%CI –0.09 to 0.19; and WMD=–0.08, 95%CI –0.24 to 0.09); d) The results of one study indicated that the rate of periodontitis in the postmenopausal osteoporosis patients was higher than that of the non-osteoporosis patients (OR=2.45, 95%CI 1.38 to 4.34, Plt;0.01); the severe alveolar crest height loss was related to osteoporosis (OR=4.20, 95%CI 1.57 to 11.22, Plt;0.01). Conclusion Postmenopausal osteoporosis patients are more prone to suffer from periodontitis or turn to the worse stage of periodontitis. In consideration of the factors such as small scales and incomplete measure indexes of the included studies, which have influences on the intensity and comprehensiveness of this conclusion, more high-quality studies are required.
Objective To assess the benefits and harms of traditional Chinese medicine in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Methods We electronically searched MEDLINE (1966-2003), EMBASE (1974-2003), Controlled Trials Register and The National Research Register, The Cochrane Library Issue 4, 2003, CBM disc, VIP, CNKI, and CMCC. We also handsearched some related journals. The search was conducted in Nov., 2003. The quality of included randomized controlled trials was evaluated and meta-analysis was conducted by RevMan 4.2.2. Results We identified 33 studies including 2 337 patients and 27 traditional Chinese medicines. Some traditional Chinese medicines alone or integrated Chinese and Western medicine may be effective for improving patients’ bone mineral density, serum oestradiol and serum calcium. For example, Compared with placebo, Bushen Yigu soft extraction with WMD 0.76, 95% confidence interval 0.65 to 0.87, Bushen Qianggu capsule with WMD 39.94, 95% confidence interval 35.12 to 44.76 were effective for improving the level of serum oestradiol.There were no confirmed results of the other traditional Chinese medicines because of the small number of studies or inconsistent conclusions among studies. We didn’t find obvious side effects. Conclusions Some traditional Chinese medicines may be effective for treating postmenopausal osteoporosis. Due to the limited evidence identified, we can not draw a firm conclusion. More randomised controlled trials of high quality are needed for ber evidence.
Hot flashes are a common syndrome in postmenopausal women. The treatment is complex and different for specific patients. A clinical case and hormonal replacement therapy selection are provided to show evidence-based practice in this field.
Primary osteoporosis is a severe social problem. It bothers the health of many aged people. Since May 1993, The doubleenergy density of bone test was carried out in postmenopausal women, among them, in 34 cases the concentration of estrogen, calcitonin parathyroidin, calcium and phosphorus in serum were examined. The results were as follows: the bone density decreased obviously while the serum calitonin and parathyroidun levels were high or low, was risen and fallen, but the serum calcium was higher than normal. Three types of osteoporosis in clinicspo stulated: 1.calcitonin and parathyroidin were normal or absent; 2.calcitonin was higher; 3.parathyroidin was higher. The treatment of the different types shouldbe individulized.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) for osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Method Systematic reviews and meta-analyses were searched in Cochrane Library (Issue 4, 2008), MEDLINE (1978-2008) and Clinical Evidence database. Search terms included Postmenopausal (post-menopausal) osteoporosis, therapy, vertebral fracture, hormone replacement therapy, randomized controlled trial, meta analysis, female,human. Result A total of 4 protocols were found in Cochrane Library and a meta-analyse was found in MEDLINE. The result demonstrated that both cancellous and cortical bone mineral density increased after HRT. Statistically significant reductions in the risk of vertebral and non-vertebral fracture were also found. Conclusion HRT can reduce the risk of osteoporotic fracture by increasing bone density. However, other disease and adverse event were also associated with the BMD increase. Therefore, both advantage and disadvantage should be considered before applying HRT therapy to postmenopausal osteoporosis patients.
Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of parathyroid hormone (PTH) on bone mineral density (BMD) and fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Methods We searched MEDLINE (1966 to March 2008), EMBASE (1974 to March 2008), The Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2008), Current Controlled Trials, The National Research Register, CBM (1983 to March 2008) and CNKI (1994 to March 2008). Some related journals were hand searched as well. The quality of included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was evaluated and meta-analysis was conducted by The Cochrane Collaboration’s software RevMan 4.2.10. Results Twelve studies involving 5550 patients were included. PTH alone or in combination with antiresorptive drugs reduced the risk of vertebral fracture (RR=0.34, 95%CI 0.26 to 0.45, Plt;0.000 01), and increased spine BMD (SMD 0.41, 95%CI 0.17 to 0.65, P=0.0009) and femoral neck BMD (SMD 0.13, 95%CI 0.03 to 0.22, P=0.008). The rate of drop out and loss to follow-up because of adverse events was significantly higher in the PTH group (Peto-OR=1.69, 95%CI 1.39 to 2.05, Plt;0.000 01). Conclusion PTH is effective in the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis, especially in patients with preexisting osteoporotic fractures or with very low bone density. PTH alone or in combination with antiresorptive drugs can reduce the risk of vertebral fractures and increase spine and femoral neck BMD. PTH is more effective than alendronate, but these two should not be used as a combined treatment.
ObjectiveTo compare the clinical effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMFs) with oral alendronate in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. MethodsFourty patients diagnosed to have postmenopausal osteoporosis (OP) from September 2009 to September 2010 were included in our study. They were randomly divided into the experimental group and the control group. All patients were administered the same basic drugs:Caltrate 600 mg and Alfacalcidol 0.5 μg per day. For the experimental group, PEMFs were offered 6 times per week for 5 weeks (30 times in total), and patients in this group were followed up for 12 weeks. For the control group, alendronate was given at a dose of 70 mg per week for 12 weeks. Bone mineral density (BMD), visual analogue scale, and manual muscle testing (MMT) scale were evaluated before, 1 week, 5 weeks, and 12 weeks after intervention. ResultsIncreasing of BMD, pain relieving, and improvement of MMT had a trend of increasing values after 5 weeks of treatment in the experimental group (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). However, there was a significant difference between the two groups in patients' lower back muscle strength after treatment (P<0.05). ConclusionPEMFs have the same effect as alendronate in pain relief, and bone mass and muscle strength improvement, and are even advantageous in increasing back muscle strength compared with alendronate.
ObjectiveTo explore the role of toremifene in postmenopausal operable patients with luminal subtype of breast cancer in China. MethodsA total of 618 eligible patients diagnosed with luminal subtype of breast cancer from January 2000 to December 2009 in the Cancer Center of Sun Yat-sen University were analyzed. One hundred and fifteen patients were treated with toremifene(toremifene group) and 503 patients were treated with tamoxifen(tamoxifen group) as adjuvant endocrine therapy. Survival was compared by Kaplan-Meier with log-rank test in two groups. Cox analysis was used to compare different prognostic factors. ResultsThe general clinical data had no significant differences between the toremifene group and tamoxifen group (P > 0.05). After a median follow-up of 76 months, there was no statistical difference in the 5-year disease free survival rate and 5-year overall survival rate between the toremifene group and the tamoxifen group (5-year disease free survival rate:78.5% versus 85.5%, P=0.083;5-year overall survival rate:86.4% versus 92.0%, P=0.334). Univariated analysis showed that the histological grade, tumor size, lymph node status, TNM stage, HER-2 positive expression were associated with the disease free survival rate and overall survival rate(P < 0.05). Multivariated analysis showed that the tumor size and lymph node status were the independent risk factors of disease free survival rate and overall survival rate for postmenopausal operable patients with luminal subtype of breast cancer(P < 0.05). HER-2 positive expression was the independent risk factor in predicting disease free survival rate for patients with tamoxifen or toremifene. There was no grade 3 or 4 toxicity for all the patients according to CTC AE 4.0 grade. ConclusionsSimilar benefit is found in disease free survival rate and overall survival rate in Chinese postmenopausal patients with operable luminal subtype of breast cancer between patients receiving toremifene and tamoxifen with tolerable adverse effects. HER-2 status is associated with disease free survival rate.
ObjectiveTo preliminarily explore the effect of Osteoporosis Self-assessment Tool for Asians (OSTA) and Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) on predicting osteoporosis and osteoporosis fracture in postmenopausal patients with maintenance hemodialysis (MHD).MethodsThirty-six postmenopausal patients undergoing MHD from August 2017 to October 2018 in Hemodialysis Center of Nephrology Department, West China Hospital of Sichuan University were selected. Relevant data such as age, height, and weight were collected. OSTA index and the 10-year probability of major osteoporotic fractures and 10-year probability of hip fractures of FRAX score were calculated. Bone mineral densities (BMD) of the hip and lumbar spine were measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at the same time. The value of OSTA index and FRAX scale in evaluating the risk of osteoporosis predicated on T value ≤−2.5 determined by DXA BMD and fracture in postmenopausal patients with MHD were analyzed.ResultsThe DXA BMD of the 36 patients showed that 50.0% (18/36) had a T value≤−2.5, and 30.6% (11/36) had a fracture history. BMD in postmenopausal patients with MHD was negatively correlated with FRAX score (model without BMD values), and positively correlated with OSTA index. The sensitivity and specificity of OSTA in the prediction of osteoporosis were 94.4% and 61.1%, respectively; and the sensitivity and specificity of FRAX (the model without BMD values) in the prediction of osteoporosis were 88.9% and 50.0%, respectively. The FRAX score with or without BMD had the same clinical value in predicting osteoporosis.ConclusionsPostmenopausal MHD patients have a higher risk of osteoporosis and fracture. Both OSTA index and FRAX scale can predict osteoporosis risk among postmenopausal MHD patients, and the FRAX scale with or without BMD has the same clinical value in predicting osteoporosis risk. In clinical work, for primary hospitals and dialysis centers lacking DXA, preliminary screening of osteoporosis in MHD patients can be performed with OSTA and FRAX scales.
Objective To systematically review the prevalence of osteoporosis (OP) in Chinese postmenopausal females. Methods The CNKI, VIP, CBM, WanFang Data, PubMed, EMbase and The Cochrane Library databases were electronically searched to collect studies on the prevalence of OP in Chinese postmenopausal females from inception to March 17th, 2022. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted data and evaluated the risk of bias of the included studies. Meta-analysis was then performed using Stata 14.0 software. Results A total of 54 studies involving 96 391 cases and 41 651 confirmed OP patients were included. The meta-analysis results showed that the prevalence of OP in Chinese postmenopausal females was 38.8% (95%CI 34.1% to 43.5%). Subgroup analysis showed that the prevalence of OP was 31.7% (95%CI 16.6% to 48.6%) in females who had been menopausal for less than 5 years, 47.4% (95%CI 32.2% to 62.5%) for 5-9 years, 52.7% (95%CI 37.1% to 68.3%) for 10-14 years, 77.5% (95%CI 69.5% to 85.4%) for 15-19 years, and 78.3% (95%CI 56.3% to 100.0%) for more than 20 years. The rate was 16.2% (95%CI 28.8% to 37.2%) in under 50 years age group, 28.8% (95%CI 34.4% to 47.9%) for 50- years group, 41.1% (95%CI 34.4% to 47.9%) for 60- years group, 55.3% (95%CI 45.8% to 64.8%) for 70- years group, 82.0% (95%CI 76.1% to 87.9%) for 80- years group. The prevalence in different regions was between 31.0% and 43.5%, which was lowest in the northeast (31.0%, 95%CI 26.3% to 51.4%) and highest in the northwest (43.5%, 95%CI 22.3% to 64.7%). According to the year of publication, the rate was 43.9% (95%CI 15.7% to 72.0%) from 1997 to 2009 and 38.2% (95%CI 33.8% to 42.5%) from 2010 to 2021. The prevalence of OP was 24.9% (95%CI 20.5% to 29.3%) in postmenopausal females with no birth or 1 birth, and 45.0% (95%CI 37.0% to 53.0%) in females with 2 or more births. Conclusion The prevalence of OP in Chinese postmenopausal females is relatively high. Due to the limited quantity and quality of the included studies, more high-quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.