west china medical publishers
Keyword
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Keyword "Shoulder dislocation" 2 results
  • ARTHROSCOPIC ASSISTED TREATMENT OF SHOULDER DISLOCATION COMBINED WITH GREATER TUBEROSITY FRACTURE

    Objective To investigate the operative method and cl inical results of arthroscopic assisted treatment of shoulder dislocation combined with fracture of greater tuberosity of humerus. Methods From February 2006 to June 2008,12 cases of shoulder dislocation (6 left, 6 right) combined with greater tuberosity fractures were treated. There were 4 males and 8 females with an average of 58.5 years (range 34-79 years). Eleven cases fall down and one was crushed. The time from injury to hospital averaged 2.1 hours (range 30 minutes-24 hours). X-ray films revealed greater tuberosity fractures with average 5.8 mm (range 5-12 mm) displacement, and MRI showed Bankart lesion in 2 cases. Arthroscopic examination taken 3-14 days after reduction revealed 3 cases of Bankart lesion and 1 case of SLAP lesion. Three cases of great tuberosity fractures were fixed with canulated screws, 2 cases with absorbable screws, 7 cases with titanium suture anchor. Three cases were repaired under arthroscopy, and 9 cases were repaired under arthroscopic assistance mini-incision. Results All the incisions were healed at first intention without infection. All patients were followed up for 6-32 months (average 16 months). The shoulder joints were fixed stably without redislocation. Six months after operation, there were 3 cases with mild l imitation of abduction and 1 case with pain in flexion related with impingement. The X-ray films showed all fractures healed 2-6 months after operation (average 3.2 months). The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and University of Cal ifornia at Los Angeles scores were 16.03 ± 1.03 and 32.65 ± 4.83, respectively. Eight cases were excellent, 3 were good, 1 were fair and the excellent and good rate was 91.7%. Conclusion For shoulder dislocation combined with fracture of greater tuberosity of humerus, the treatment by shoulder arthroscopy is a safe and mini-invasive operative method with comprehensively accurate intraoperation diagnosis, satisfying therapeutic effect, good functional recovery, as well as obvious rel ief of pain.

    Release date:2016-09-01 09:05 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Study on the evaluation of glenoid bone defects by MRI three-dimensional reconstruction

    Objective To investigate the feasibility of MRI three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction model in quantifying glenoid bone defect by comparing with CT 3D reconstruction model measurement. Methods Forty patients with shoulder anterior dislocation who met the selection criteria between December 2021 and December 2022 were admitted as study participants. There were 34 males and 6 females with an average age of 24.8 years (range, 19-32 years). The injury caused by sports injury in 29 cases and collision injury in 6 cases, and 5 cases had no obvious inducement. The time from injury to admission ranged from 4 to 72 months (mean, 28.5 months). CT and MRI were performed on the patients’ shoulder joints, and a semi-automatic segmentation of the images was done with 3D slicer software to construct a glenoid model. The length of the glenoid bone defect was measured on the models by 2 physicians. The intra-group correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to evaluate the consistency between the 2 physicians, and Bland-Altman plots were constructed to evaluate the consistency between the 2 methods. Results The length of the glenoid bone defects measured on MRI 3D reconstruction model was (3.83±1.36) mm/4.00 (0.58, 6.13) mm for physician 1 and (3.91±1.20) mm/3.86 (1.39, 5.96) mm for physician 2. The length of the glenoid bone defects measured on CT 3D reconstruction model was (3.81±1.38) mm/3.80 (0.60, 6.02) mm for physician 1 and (3.99±1.19) mm/4.00 (1.68, 6.38) mm for physician 2. ICC and Bland-Altman plot analysis showed good consistency. The ICC between the 2 physicians based on MRI and CT 3D reconstruction model measurements were 0.73 [95%CI (0.54, 0.85)] and 0.80 [95%CI (0.65, 0.89)], respectively. The 95%CI of the difference between the two measurements of physicians 1 and 2 were (–0.46, 0.49) and (–0.68, 0.53), respectively. Conclusion The measurement of glenoid bone defect based on MRI 3D reconstruction model is consistent with that based on CT 3D reconstruction model. MRI can be used instead of CT to measure glenoid bone defects in clinic, and the soft tissue of shoulder joint can be observed comprehensively while reducing radiation.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
1 pages Previous 1 Next

Format

Content