Objective To investigate the therapeutic effectof infected incision wounds after sternotomy by using different reconstructive methods. Methods From December 1997 to December 2006, 13 patients (8 males, 5 females; age, 28-72 years averaged 52 years) with infected incision wounds after sternotomy underwent the reconstruction surgery respectivelyusing the pectoralis major muscle flaps, the medial flaps of the pectoralis major muscle, the rectus abdominis muscle flaps or the greater omentum transpositions. Among the patients, 8 were complicated by diabetes mellitus, 4 by pneumonia and heart failure, 3 by empyema, 4 by chronic insufficiency of the pulmonary function, 1 by malignant tumor, and 6 by severe obesity. Freshlysplit wounds werefound in 11 patients and chronic wounds in the other 2 patients.The size of thewounds was 10cm×5cm-22cm×10cm. Results Among the 13 patients，10 survived after operation and the other 3 died of massive hemorrhage from the anastomostic rupture of the blood vessel, pneumonia, and cancer metastasis, respectively. Of the 10 patients, 6 had their wounds healed by first intention. The follow-up for 6 months to 5 years revealed that there was no recurrencein all the survived patients. Of the 10 patients, 2 developed partial necrosisof the skins at the sutured wounds, which was healed after the skin grafting operation; 2 had an infection at the drainage area but had a healing after the dressing changes. Conclusion The smaller wounds in the upper partof the sternotomy incision should be repaired with the medial flaps of the pectoralis major muscle; the greater wounds in the upper part of the incision shouldbe repaired and reconstructed with the rectus abdominis muscle flap; the smaller wounds in the lower part of the incision should be repaired with the pectoralis major muscle flap, and if the wounds are longer, they should be repaired and reconstructed with the pectoralis major muscle flap and the rectus abdominis muscle flap; and if the wounds are huge enough with an exposure of the important internal organs, the greater omentum transposition should be used, and the residual wounds should be treated with dressing changes and even skin grafting.
Cardiac surgery has a gradual change from traditional median sternotomy to minimally invasive surgery due to the appearance and application of peripheral extracorporeal circulation. There are great differences in the clinical practice of two different surgical methods in mitral valve operation. Minimally invasive thoracic surgery has the advantages of less trauma, less bleeding, faster recovery, beauty and so on. However, such surgery also has its weaknesses, such as longer learning curve, narrow operation space and high requirements of equipment. To compare the differences of early and long-term results in mitral valve operation between traditional median sternotomy and minimally invasive thoracic surgery is to better summarize and operate minimally invasive thoracic surgery for mitral valve surgery.