ObjectiveTo explore the application effect of information-based circuit teaching mode for training refresher nurses in continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT).MethodsCRRT refresher nurses studied in West China Hospital of Sichuan University from January 2016 to December 2019 were selected. The CRRT refresher nurses who were selected as the control group (studied from January 2016 to December 2017) accepted the conventional teaching method. The CRRT refresher nurses who were selected as the test group (studied from January 2018 to December 2019) accept the information-based combined with circuit teaching mode for teaching and training. After 6 months of training, the theoretical performance, operation performance, teaching satisfaction and the incidence of adverse events were compared between the two groups.ResultsA total of 112 CRRT refresher nurses were enrolled. Among them, there were 52 nurses in the control group and 60 in the test group. The scores of theory achievement (t=−2.421, P=0.017), operation achievement (t=−2.305, P=0.023) and teaching satisfaction [including teaching effect (t=−4.067, P<0.001), operation skill (t=−5.013, P<0.001), teaching mode (t=−5.589, P<0.001) and teaching content (t=−2.586, P<0.001)] of refresher nurses in the test group were higher than those in the control group. There was no significant difference between the control group (4 cases) and the test group (1 case) in the occurrence of adverse nursing events (adjusted χ2=1.169, P=0.280).ConclusionThe information-based circuit teaching mode has achieved good results in the teaching of CRRT refresher nurses, which is conducive to improving the post competency of CRRT refresher nurses.
Objective To observate the influencing factors on circuit life during continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) with regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA), so as to provide data support for further optimization of RCA anticoagulation strategy. MethodsPatients who underwent CRRT with RCA in West China Hospital of Sichuan University between March 2021 and April 2022 were retrospectively selected. Analyze the basic information of patients and the impact of relevant indicators before or within 12 hours of treatment on the circuit life. Results A total of 116 patients were included. Among the included patients, a total of 225 cases were treated with CRRT for 11 051.7 hours, the median circuit life was 57.0 (25.4, 72.0) h. 142 cases (63.1%) were terminated due to coagulation, the median circuit life was 30.3 (20.5, 52.8) h. The results of multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that pH value [hazard ratio (HR)=0.002, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.0001, 0.127), P=0.003], the maximam postfilter ionized calcium [HR=0.039, 95%CI (0.004, 0.437), P=0.008], blood flow [HR=1.051, 95%CI (1.027, 1.075), P<0.001] and catheter dysfunction [HR=5.701, 95%CI (3.777, 8.605), P<0.001] were the four influential factors affected circuit life. Kaplan Meier survival curve showed that RCA had the best effect when the postfilter ionized calcium was in the range of 0.25 ~ 0.35 mmol/L. Conclusions During CRRT treatment of RCA, pH value, postfilter ionized calcium, blood flow and catheter function are the independent influencing factors of circuit life. The above parameters should be carefully monitored and optimized in the treatment process to minimize the risk of coagulation, prolong the circuit life and maintain the continuty of CRRT treatment. The postfilter ionized calcium was recommended to be maitained at 0.25-0.35mmol/L, pH value maintained above 7.38, blood flow no more than 145 mL/min and catheter maitained patency to ensure the adequate anticoagulation.
Objective To evaluate the effects of two filtration fraction formulas on extracorporeal circulation life of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) under regional citrate anticoagulation. Methods Patients with acute kidney injury who received CRRT treatment with regional citrate anticoagulation and the estimated CRRT duration was greater than 24 h at West China Hospital of Sichuan University between June 2022 and April 2023 were selected. They were randomly divided into continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVH), continuous veno-venous hemodialysis (CVVHD) and continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) groups using Prismaflex machines. The life of the CRRT extracorporeal circulation in the three groups of patients was compared, and the reasons for replacing the extracorporeal circulation after 72 h were not used, and the filtration fraction score of the three groups was calculated according to the two filtration score calculation formulas (Formula 1 and Formula 2) currently used in the world. The filtration value obtained by the two filtration fraction calculation formulas was taken as the test variable, and whether the median life of the group with the longest extracorporeal circulation life was taken as the state variable, and the receiver operating characteristic curve was drawn, and the area under the curve was calculated. Results A total of 121 patients were included, including 40 patients in the CVVH group, 40 patients in the CVVHD group, and 41 patients in the CVVHDF group. The extracorporeal circulation life of CVVH group, CVVHD group and CVVHDF group was 64 (46, 71) h, 47 (31.5, 54) h and 70 (65, 72) h, respectively, with statistical difference (log-rank P=0.036). A total of 94 cases were replaced due to filter or venous pot clotting after 72 h after the filter was not used, including 30 cases in the CVVH group, 39 cases in the CVVHD group, and 25 cases in the CVVHDF group. The difference between the three groups was statistically significant (χ2=15.83, P<0.001). According to Formula 1, the filtration fraction of CVVH group, CVVHD group and CVVHDF group was 15.8% (15.2%, 17.0%), 1.1% (0.7%, 2.1%) and 16.2% (14.9%, 17.6%), respectively, and the difference among the three groups was statistically significant (H=69.402, P<0.001). According to Formula 2, the filtration fraction of CVVH group, CVVHD group and CVVHDF group was 33.1% (32.4%, 35.7%), 4.0% (3.6%, 4.9%) and 19.1% (17.7%, 20.7%), respectively, and the differences among the three groups and pairwise comparison between groups were statistically significant (P<0.001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curvec calculated by the Formula 1 and 2 for the influence of filtration fraction on extracorporeal circulation life were 0.539 and 0.668, the sensitivity were 43.18% and 82.22%, and the specificity were 80.65% and 56.25%, respectively. Conclusions When using Prismaflex machine, the filter life of CVVHD is shorter than CVVH and CVVHDF modes. The filtration fraction calculated by Formula 2 is more sensitive but less specific in predicting CRRT extracorporeal circulation life. Filtration fraction as a CRRT extracorporeal circulation risk assessment has limitations, especially for the CVVH model with pre and post replacement.
With the development of medical information technology, smart teaching has been widely applied in various fields of medical education. The application of smart teaching technologies such as virtual simulation, intelligent evaluation, and smart teaching platform in blood purification specialized nursing teaching have gradually increased. This article provides an overview of the application of smart teaching mode in blood purification specialized nursing teaching both domestically and internationally, and introduces the integration of online and offline smart teaching mode, in order to provide a theoretical basis for improving the quality of blood purification specialized nursing teaching.
Objective To investigate the safety and efficacy of two different anticoagulation regimens of fondaparinux and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). Methods The clinical data of patients undergoing CRRT in West China Hospital of Sichuan University between October 2021 and April 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into fondaparinux sodium group and LMWH group according to anticoagulation with fondaparinux or LMWH during CRRT. The general condition, life expectancy of cardiopulmonary bypass, coagulation events, bleeding events, hemoglobin, and coagulation function-related indicators were compared between the two groups. Results A total of 78 patients were finally included, including 38 in the LMWH group and 40 in the fondaparinux group. The age of the patients in the LMWH group was older than that in the fondaparinux group [76.0 (57.0, 85.0) vs. 63.0 (52.3, 76.0) years, P=0.016]. There was no significant difference in other clinical baseline conditions (including gender, vascular access site, and treatment indications) between the two groups (P≥0.05). The cardiopulmonary bypass life of patients in the fondaparinux group was better than that in the LMWH group [67.1 (35.0, 72.0) vs. 42.0 (20.0, 55.3) h, P=0.003]. The survival rate of cardiopulmonary bypass in the fondaparinux group at 24, 48, and 72 h were higher than that in the LMWH group (87.5% vs. 65.8%, P=0.023; 67.5% vs. 36.8%, P=0.007; 42.5% vs. 13.2%, P=0.004). The incidence of blood filter coagulation events in the fondaparinux group was lower than that in the LMWH group (50.0% vs. 84.2%, P=0.001). There was no significant difference in the incidence of coagulation events and mild bleeding events between the two groups (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in hemoglobin and coagulation function-related indicators between the two groups before and after CRRT (P>0.05). Conclusion The continuity of maintenance therapy with fondaparinux is better than that of LMWH, and the safety of both in the course of CRRT treatment is comparable.
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of nafamostat mesylate as an in vitro anticoagulant in continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) using oXiris filters for patients with sepsis-associated acute kidney injury (SA-AKI). Methods SA-AKI patients at high risk of bleeding who received oXiris filter-CRRT at West China Hospital of Sichuan University between November 2021 and January 2023 were included in the study. Patients who received nafamostat mesylate as an anticoagulant were categorized into the nafamostat group, while patients who did not receive any anticoagulant during the same period were categorized into the control group. A comparative analysis was conducted between the two groups regarding general conditions, the lifespan of the first filter in CRRT, the number and percentage of cases with the first filter lasting 24, 48, and 72 h, activated clotting time (ACT) before and during treatment (both pre-filter and post-filter), laboratory test results before and after treatment, incidence of adverse reactions during treatment, and clinical outcomes of the patients. The mean ± standard deviation was used for normal distribution, and the median (lower quartile, upper quartile) was used for non-normal distribution. Results A total of 118 patients were included in the study, with 90 in the control group and 28 in the nafamostat group. There was no statistically significant difference in the general conditions or pre-treatment laboratory test indicators between the two groups (P>0.05). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that the lifespan of the first filter was longer in the nafamostat group compared to the control group (hazard ratio=0.524, P=0.001). The percentage of patients whose first filter lasted 24 h was higher in the nafamostat group than that in the control group (60.7% vs. 25.7%, P=0.001); however, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups for the first filter lasting 48 h or 72 h (P>0.05). During CRRT treatment, the mean post-filter ACT was longer in the nafamostat group than that in the control group [(216.7±43.2) vs. (181.6±35.5) s, P<0.001], and the mean post-filter ACT was longer than the pre-filter ACT in the nafamostat group [(216.7±43.2) vs. (183.3±37.7) s, P=0.005]. After the treatment, the international normalized ratio [1.5 (1.1, 1.8) vs. 1.7 (1.4, 2.4)], interleukin-6 levels [(235.5±80.9) vs. (500.5±112.7) pg/mL] were lower, and platelet count [48.0 (31.8, 73.0)×109/L vs. 29.0 (11.0, 61.8)×109/L] was higher in the nafamostat group compared to the control group (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in other laboratory test indicators (P>0.05). The clinical outcomes of the patients did not show statistically significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion Nafamostat mesilate may be an effective and safe anticoagulant in SA-AKI patients at high risk of bleeding underwent oXiris filter-CRRT, and its in vitro anticoagulant effect is better than that without anticoagulant.