Epstein-Barr (EB) virus infection is associated with various tumors of lymphoid and epithelial origin. EB virus exists in most humans as a latent infection. EB virus latent infection-related genes play a key role in the EB virus latent infection, and also play an important role in promoting the occurrence and development of related tumors. This article will briefly introduce the characteristics of EB virus latent infection, the protein coding genes and non-coding genes related to EB virus latent infection (including EB virus nuclear antigen genes, EB virus latent membrane protein genes, EB virus encoded small RNA genes and EB virus microRNA genes), and the main functional mechanism of these EB virus latent infection-related genes in EB virus latent infection and subsequent tumorigenesis. The purpose is to providea theoretical basis for a comprehensive understanding of the EB virus latent infection and the mechanism of tumors caused by EB virus.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the clinical significance of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing algorithm combining antigen/antibody assay screening with Western Blot (WB) or HIV nucleic acid.MethodsData of HIV antigen and antibody screening samples in West China Hospital of Sichuan University in 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The 4th generation antigen and antibody reagents were used for initial screening, and the 3rd generation antibody reagents were used for reexamination. WB or HIV nucleic acid detection was performed as supplementary test.ResultsA total of 217 803 samples were initially screened, 718 samples were positive in initial screening (0.33%) and 513 samples were confirmed positive (0.24%). The 718 initial positive samples were confirmed by WB, among them, 513 (71.45%) were positive, 163 (22.70%) were negative, and 42 (5.85%) were indeterminate. Fifteen samples which were negative or indeterminate were detected by HIV RNA, as a result, 6 were positive. Two of four patients turned into positive during follow-up. Among the 536 samples which were positive in both the 4th and 3rd generation assay, there were 513 (95.71%) positive, 6 (1.12%) negative, and 17 (3.17%) indeterminate confirmed by WB; among the 182 samples which were positive in the 4th generation assay but negative in the 3rd generation assay, there were none (0.00%) positive, 157 (86.26%) negative, and 25 (13.74%) indeterminate confirmed by WB. The positive rate of confirmation test of samples positive in the 4th and 3rd generation assay (95.71%, 513/536) was significantly higher than that of samples positive in the 4th generation assay but negative in the 3rd generation assay (0%, 0/182), and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=610.091, P<0.001). WB band types for positive samples were dominated by the whole bands and sub-bands, accounting for 82.26%. The cut off index in ≥5 bands group was higher than that in < 4 bands group (P<0.001).ConclusionsSamples with both the 4th and 3rd generation assay positive have a high positive rate of confirmation test, and a supplementary test is needed to be done as soon as possible to confirm the diagnosis. Samples with only the 4th generation assay positive have a low positive rate of confirmation test. But for patients with a high-risk history, HIV nucleic acid should be done as soon as possible for early diagnosis.