Objective To explore the difference between bone marrow edema syndrome (BMES) and avascular necrosis of femoral head (ANFH). Methods Recent original articles about BMES and ANFH were extensively reviewed, and were comprehensively analysed. Results The pathology, pathogenesis, clinical features, treatment selection, and prognosis are different between these two diseases. Conclusion BMES and ANFH are two different diseases. Micro-fracture may be the cause of bone marrow edema.
Objective To explore the treatment of dislocation after total hip replacement. Methods From July 1997 to October 2004, 23 casesof dislocation after total hip replacement were treated,including 9 males and 14 females and aging 5379 years. The CT and serial X-ray films were taken to observe the position of prostheses. The strength of their hip abductor was also tested. In the patients without loosening, closed reduction was attempted at first. The stability of hip was tested. If closed reduction failed, the offset or/and parts of the components was adjusted, then the capsular was repaired. If instabilitystill existed, revision was adopted. Results In 23 cases of dislocation, 10 cases were treated successfully by closed reduction. In 12 patients who failed reduction, 5 were given open reduction combined with capsular repairing; the offset was adjusted by lengthening femoral head in 2 cases; rim liners were elevated in 2 cases; and larger offset was used and abnormal liner was adjusted in 1 case. Revision was used in 1 case having loosening and 2 cases having instability. Allpatients were followed up 1 year to 5 years (1.9 years on average). The Harrisscoring was 7294 (87 on average). Conclusion The treatment of dislocation after total hip replacement should use different ways according to the causes of dislocation and the stability of hip.
Objective To evaluate the mid-term effectiveness of cerclage wires fixation in treating Mallory typeⅡperiprosthetic femoral fractures associated with primary hip arthroplasty. Methods A retrospective analysis was made in the data of 14 patients (14 hips) with Mallory typeⅡ periprosthetic femoral fractures associated with primary hip arthroplasty and treated with cerclage wires fixation between January 2010 and June 2011 (fracture group). Twenty-eight patients (28 hips) without periprosthetic femoral fractures associated with primary hip arthroplasty at the same stage were chosen as control group. The uncemented femoral prosthesis were used in 2 groups. There was no significant difference in gender, age, body mass index, and primary disease between 2 groups (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and the complications were recorded. The Harris score was used to evaluate the hip function and the visual analogue scale (VAS) score was used to evaluate the pain degree of hip. According to the postoperative X-ray films of hips, Enghet al. standard was used to evaluate the fixed and stable status of the femoral prosthesis; the heterotopic ossification was observed; the time of fracture union was recorded. Results The operation time of fracture group was significantly longer than that of control group (t=–3.590, P=0.001). There was no significant difference in the intraoperative blood loss between 2 groups (t=–1.276, P=0.209). All patients were followed up 64-75 months (mean, 69.5 months). Hip dislocation after operation occurred in 1 case of fracture group; delirium symptom and nonunion of incision occurred in 1 case and 1 case of control group, respectively. There was no significant difference in the Harris score and VAS score at 6 months and 5 years between 2 groups (P>0.05). X-ray films showed that all fractures healed and the mean time of fracture union were 6.1 months (range, 3-12 months). There was no fracture nonunion or malunion evidently. There was no significant difference in X-ray score at 6 months and 5 years between 2 groups (P>0.05). At last follow-up, cerclage wires displacement or breakage did not occur. Heterotopic ossification occurred in 2 cases of fracture group and in 1 case of control group. Conclusion Cerclage wires fixation can achieve the good mid-term effectiveness in treating Mallory typeⅡintraoprative periprosthetic femoral fractures associated with primary hip arthroplasty.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of the surgeon’s handedness on the distribution of prosthesis during primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA).MethodsA retrospective analysis was performed on 86 patients (100 knees) with primary TKA completed by the same right-handed surgeon between December 2016 and December 2018, including 72 cases of single knee and 14 of bilateral knees. The patients were divided into dominant group (right side) and non-dominant group (left side) according to the operating position of the surgeon and each group had 50 knees. There was no significant difference in gender, age, body mass index, disease duration, clinical diagnosis, preoperative Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score, and other general data between the two groups (P>0.05). The operation time and complications were recorded in both groups. The function of knee was evaluated by HSS score. Hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), and mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA) were measured by using X-ray film of full-length lower extremity before TKA and at 2 weeks after TKA that were used to evaluate the coronal position of the prosthesis. Posterior distal femoral angle (PDFA) and posterior proximal tibial angle (PPTA) were measured by using lateral X-ray films at 3 months after operation that were used to evaluate the sagittal position of the prosthesis.ResultsThere was no significant difference in operation time between the two groups (t=−1.128, P=0.262). One case of posterior tibial artery thrombosis occurred in the dominant group, and 1 case of poor healing of the incision occurred in each of the dominant group and the non-dominant group. Patients in both groups were followed up 12-34 months with an average of 22.0 months. The HSS scores at last follow-up were 87.2±4.3 in the dominant group and 86.8±5.0 in the non-dominant group. There was no significant difference between the two groups (t=0.471, P=0.639). No complications such as periprosthetic infection, prosthetic loosening, or periprosthetic fracture occurred during follow-up. There was no significant difference in the HKA, mLDFA, and mMPTA between the two groups before and after operation (P>0.05). The differences in the incidence of sagittal femoral prosthesis malposition and PDFA between the two groups were significant (P<0.05); however, there was no significant difference in the PPTA, the rate of femoral prosthesis distributed in the neutral position, the incidence of over-flexed femoral prosthesis, and the incidence of anterior femoral notch (P>0.05).ConclusionThe surgeon’s handedness is one of the factors affecting the placement of the sagittal femoral prosthesis in primary TKA. The incidence of sagittal femoral prosthesis malposition could increase when the surgeon performs on the non-dominant side.
Objective To explore the differences between transient osteoporosis of the hi p (TOH) and bone marrow edema (BME) associated with osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) in terms of cl inical practice and imaging. Methods From January 2006 to February 2008, 5 hips of TOH in 5 cases (1 male and 4 females, aged 29-42 years) and 67 hips of BME associated with ONFH in 63 cases (53 males and 10 females, aged 18-70 years) were analyzed. According to ARCO classification, there were 23 hi ps of stage II, 43 hi ps of stage III, and 1 hi p of stage IV. The induced factors, the degree of pain, the duration of pain and commemorative symptoms were compared. The X-ray, MRI and ECT were also compared. Results There were no differences in induced factors, the degree of pain, joint effusion and ECT between TOH and BME associated with ONFH. TOH had no risk factors, antecedent symptoms and commemorative pain. There were 2 hips with TOH which showed osteopenia on X-ray films. The location of edema was in the superior part or the whole femoral head.A total of 65 hips with BME associated with ONFH had related causes of disease, 10 had antecedent pain and 59 had change of hardening on X-ray films. The X-ray films showed sclerotic area and the edema changes on MRI surrounded the necrotic lesion. The pain just amel iorated when BME disappeared. Conclusion There are differences between TOH and BME associated with ONFH on symptoms, X-ray films and MRI.