Objective To explore the correlation between traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) blood stasis pattern of coronary heart disease (CHD) and coronary angiography result, so as to screen dangerous patterns and provide evidence for the objectification of TCM pattern differentiation. Methods Literature on correlation between blood stasis pattern and coronary angiography results from January 1992 to May 2012 were searched in the following databases: China Academic Journal Network Publishing Database (CAJD), Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), China Doctor Dissertation Full-text Database (CDFD), Chinese Selected Master’s Theses Full-Text Databases (CMFD), PubMed and MEDLINE. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, literature screening, data extraction and methodological quality assessment of the included studies were conducted. Then meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.1 software. Results A total of 28 studies involving 4 901 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that, there is a significant significance between blood stasis pattern and the following coronary angiography result, namely, number of culprit vessels (OR=1.38, 95%CI 1.08 to 1.77, Plt;0.05), severity of stenosis (OR=1.79, 95%CI 1.04 to 3.08, Plt;0.05), and Gensini score (OR=7.74, 95%CI 3.99 to 11.49, Plt;0.05). Conclusion Compared with other TCM patterns, CHD with blood stasis pattern easily tends to present multi-vessels lesions, more than 75% stenosis and higher Gensini score, indicating the condition of CHD with blood stasis pattern is more severe than with other patterns. Due to the discrepancy of pattern differentiation and the limited quality of original studies, this conclusion is insufficient to be fully applied into clinical practice, and more large scale and high quality clinical trials are required.
目的 探讨急性重症胰腺炎不同时期的治疗方式，观察治疗效果以及治疗前后的临床表现。 方法 回顾性分析2006年1月-2009年1月收治的34例急性重症胰腺炎患者的临床资料，患者给予内科规范化治疗，并对比治疗前、后的APACHEⅡ评分、主要的实验室检查指标以及CT检查表现。 结果 31例治愈，2例中途转外科治疗，1例死亡。所有患者治疗后APACHEⅡ评分较治疗前减小（Plt;0.01），治疗后血清淀粉酶和白细胞计数较治疗前明显降低（Plt;0.05），而治疗后短期内CT检查表现无明显变化。 结论 内科规范化治疗能有效地治疗急性重症胰腺炎，适当的肠内外营养和预防性使用抗生素可有效地减少急性重症胰腺炎并发症的发生。APACHE-Ⅱ评分可作为判断急性重症胰腺炎患者预后的指标。
Objective To investigate the adverse drug reactions (ADRs) of patients with SARS in Xiao Tang Shan Hospital. Methods We developed and distributed Drug Use Handbook and established ADRs monitoring group to guide resaonable drug use. We followed up the process and collected clinical report on ADRs. We retrospectively analyzed the data on ADRs by the classification and grade of ADRs according to WHO and Hospital Information Sysytem (HIS) of Chinese PLA General Hospital. Results We collected 193 (87 males and 106 females) patients with ADRs among 680 SARS patients with incidence rate of ADRs of 28.38%. The ADRs incidence rate was higher in females and elders. Critical SARS patients and SARS patients with diabetes were more susceptible to ADRs. Large dosage and combination of drugs may induce ADRs. Steroids may be a main cause of ADRs. The ADRs incidence rate induced by injection was higher than that induced by all kinds of oral drugs. ADRs mainly happened in hematological, endocrine and digestive systems. Conclusion SARS patients are prescribed many kinds of medications. Large dosage of so many medications may lend to high incidence rate of ADRs. Steroid should be cautiously used in the treatment of SARS.
Objective To study the medication usage in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). Methods The information of the medications of 680 patients with SARS in Xiao Tang Shan Hospital was collected by HIS system and classified by using computer model on the basis of disease factor. The usage time and cases, and cost of these medications were calculated. The defined daily dose (DDD) and drug utilization index (DUI) were analyzed. Results A number of 359 drugs in 17 categories were applied to 680 patients with SARS. Most cases used antibacterial agents, the DDDs of immunomodulator and vitamins were the highest, the usage duration of vitamins and infusion fluids were the longest among 17 kinds of the drugs. The cost of methylpredni-solone injection was the highest. The mortality rate, kinds of drugs and frequency of drugs were higher in type C, type D and serious SARS patients than that of type A and common SARS patients. Conclusions Many kinds of medications have been prescribed to SARS patients. The dosages of these medication are very high, especially glucocorticoids, immuneomodulator and nutrient agents. The computer model on the basis of disease factor is probably valid, rapid and easy to standardize.