Objective To analyze clinical value of early enteral nutrition following radical resection of gastric cancer. Methods Seventy-six patients with gastric cancer underwent radical resection from May 1, 2016 to July 1, 2016 in the West China Hospital of Sichuan University were included according to the inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria, then were randomly divided into observation group (36 cases) and control group (40 cases). The patients in the observation group received the enteral nutrition on day 2 following the surgery, in the control group received the conventional management. The gastrointestinal recovery and the adverse reaction were compared in these two groups. The preoperative and postoperative laboratory indicators and the body weight of the patients in both groups were analyzed. Results ① The general data such as age, gender, and body weight had no significant differences in these two groups (P>0.05). ② The first anus exhaust time and the first defecation time of the observation group were significantly shorter than those of the control group (P<0.05). ③ The adverse reaction rate of the observation group was significantly lower than that of the control group (P<0.05). ④ On admission, the serum albumin, urea nitrogen, creatinine, and lymphocyte count had no significant differences in these two groups (P>0.05). On day 5 after the operation, the serum albumin of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group (P<0.05). ⑤ The body weight had no significant difference in these two groups before the operation (P>0.05), which in the observation group was significantly heavier than that of the control group on day 30 after the operation (P<0.05). Conclusion Preliminary results of limited cases in this study show that early enteral nutrition following radical resection of gastric cancer is safe and effective, it could promote gastrointestinal function resumption and effectively improve nutritional status.
ObjectiveTo research and summarize the best evidences of probiotic-riched early enteral nutrition for postoperative liver transplantation, and provide references for precise and individual clinical nutrition and probiotics usage management in patients with liver transplantation.MethodsThe scientific problem was established according to the PIPOST. The British Medical Journal Best Practice, Cochrane Library, Jonna Briggs Institute, Guidelines International Network, National Guideline Clearinghouse, etc. were used to search the papers or relative data recordings. The evidence evaluation and summary were carried out based on the previous documents.ResultsOne evidence summary, 2 systematic reviews, and 5 randomized controlled studies were included. Based on the specific questions, 6 dimensions (24 evidences) were extracted and summarized: the early enteral nutrition was used within postoperative 24 h, starting with 20 mL/h, but not more than 125 mL/h, essential nutrients would be fine and tube feeding would be converted to oral feeding as soon as possible; Lactobacillus 20 mg and Bifidobacterium 15 mg were suggested, 3 times/d, probiotic-riched early enteral nutrition for postoperative liver transplantation should be lasted for at least 14 d.ConclusionsEvidence-based medicine is used to collect the best evidence of probiotic-riched early enteral nutrition for postoperative liver transplantation, there are few studies on early enteral nutrition after liver transplantation in China. Application of the best evidence needs to be analyzed and constructed according to current situation of liver transplantation in China.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of early enteral nutrition (EEN) support in the perioperative period of children with perforated appendicitis based on the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS). MethodsThe children with perforated appendicitis were collected as an observation group, who underwent EEN support treatment based on the ERAS mode from January 2021 to December 2022 in the Xuzhou Children’s Hospital. At the same time, the children with perforated appendicitis received conventional nutrition support from January 2019 to December 2020 were matched as a control group according to the principle of balanced and comparable baseline data such as the gender, age, disease course, pathological type, and body mass index with the observation group. The time of first exhaust or defecation and the hospital stay after surgery were compared. Meanwhile, the nutritional indexes [prealbumin (PA), albumin (ALB), hemoglobin (Hb)], immune indexes [immunoglobulin (Ig) A, IgM, IgG], serum inflammatory factors [C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α)] before surgery, on day 1 and 7 after surgery were compared. And the adverse effects were observed. ResultsThere were 40 children with perforated appendicitis in the observation group and the control group, respectively. There were no statistical differences in the baseline data such as the gender, age, course of disease, pathological type, and body mass index between the two groups (P>0.05). The time of first exhaust or defecation and the hospital stay after surgery in the observation group were shorter than in the control group (t=3.234, P=0.002; t=5.582, P<0.001). The levels of PA, ALB, Hb, IgA, IgM, and IgG in the observation group were higher than in the control group on day 7 after surgery (P<0.05). The levels of CRP, IL-6, and TNF-α in the observation group were lower than in the control group on day 7 after surgery (P<0.05）. The incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group was lower than that in the control group [5.0% (2/40) vs. 22.5% (9/40), χ2=5.165, P=0.023]. ConclusionsFrom on the results of this study, EEN support based on ERAS during perioperative period of children with perforated appendicitis contributes to recover gastrointestinal function, correct nutritional status, improve immune function, and reduce inflammation, and which has a higher safety for children with perforated appendicitis.