To discuss renovascular reconstruction during l iving related donor kidney transplantation (LDKT). Methods Seventy-seven cases of LDKT from April 2006 to March 2008 were retrospectively analyzed, including 63 cases in single renal artery group and 14 cases in multi ple artery group. In multi ple artery group, there were 3 cases of three arteries and 11 cases of double arteries; 9 cases of donated left kidneys and 5 cases of donated right kidneys. Potential donors underwent fully medical evaluation before operation, including donor-reci pient human leucocyte antigen matchingand a cross match test. The donor’s operation of the incision either underneath the 12th rib approaching the dorsal lumbar was performed and the transplantation operation adopted the extraperitoneal approach in the contralateral fossa il iac. The arteries in the multiple artery group were implanted onto the external (or common) il iac artery different from the orthodox method. Results In multiple artery group, no blood transfusion during operation was performed, no compl ication occurred after operation and all donors were discharged after 7-9 days of postoperation. After a follow-up of 3 months to 1 year, all the recipients kept normal kidney function without renal tubule necrosis, renal artery embol ism, vascular stenosis, urinary fistula and ureter necrosis. The ultrasound examination showed that the transplanted kidney had good blood supply. There was no significant difference in the time of urine secretion, serum creatinine level after 1 week of operation, length of hospital ization between the multiple artery group and the single artery group (P gt; 0.05). Conclusion The accurate treatment of multiple artery anastomosis are critical for the safety of the LDKT.
Objective To find out the beneficial and harmful effectiveness of tacrolimus (TAC) compared with cyclosporine A (CSA) for simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant (SPKT) recipients. Methods Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of TAC versus CSA for SPKT recipients were collected from The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMbase, SCI, and CBM database. Bias risk assessment and meta-analysis were performed based on the methods recommended by the Cochrane Collaboration. Results Five RCTs including 342 recipients were included. Pooled data of pancreas survival favored TAC (RR=1.15, 95%CI 1.04 to 1.27; RD=0.11, 95%CI 0.03 to 0.19). However, there were no significant differences of acute rejection (RR=0.81, 95%CI 0.58 to 1.12), patient survival (RR=1.00, 95%CI 0.94 to 1.05), kidney survival (RR=1.02, 95%CI 0.95 to 1.09), and infection (RR=1.00, 95%CI 0.83 to 1.20). Conclusion Based on the recent evidence, TAC results in higher episodes of pancreas survival compared with CSA after SPKT. Treating 100 patients with TAC instead of CSA would increase pancreas survival in 11 recipients.
Objective To evaluate the impact of portal or systemic venous pancreas graft drainage on patient and graft outcomes following simultaneous pancreas kidney transplantation (SPK). Methods We searched The Cochrane Library (2008, Issue 1), PubMed (1970 to Feb 2008) and EMBASE (1974 to Feb 2008) to find studies concerning the effect of systemic versus portal venous pancreas graft drainage on patient and graft outcomes. Meta-analyses were conducted using The Cochrane Collaboration’s RevMan 4.2 software. Results Three RCTs involving 401 simultaneous pancreas kidney transplants were included in our meta-analysis. Statistically significant differences were only observed in 3- and 5-year pancreas graft survival rates (P=0.03 and P=0.05). No significant difference was noted in patient or kidney graft survival rates. Conclusion Currently available evidences from RCTs does not support the effectiveness of portal drainage in preventing thrombosis, rejection or infection after SPK. Large-scale, long-term and appropriately designed RCTs are required to conclude whether portal and systemic drainage in pancreas transplantation are equivalent in terms of patient and graft survival.
【Abstract】Objective To investigate the potential role of tumor necrosis factoralpha (TNFα) in apoptosis after combined liver and kidney transplantation in rats. MethodsEighty rats which had combined liver and kidney transplantation were randomly paired, were divided into study group (n=20) and control group (n=20). 40 ml of 4 ℃ sodium chloride and antiTNFα monoclonal antibody (30 ml was infused from portal veins to donated livers and 10 ml from renal arteries to donated kidneys) were infused to the study group (0.1 mg/kg weight),and the same quantity of 4 ℃ sodium chloride was infused the control group. Venous blood was drew at different phases after the transplantations to detect the function of kidney and liver. The level of TNFα and the cell apoptosis were detected in the transplanted tissues of liver and kidney by ELISA and terminal deoxynucleotidy transferase mediated dTUPbiotin nickend labeling (TUNEL). ResultsThe levels of AST, ACT, Cr and BUN in the study group were significantly lower than those of the control group at the same phases (P＜0.05). The level of TNFα in the transplanted tissues of kidney and liver was also significantly lower as compared with those of control group. The cell apoptosis index of the transplanted tissues of kidney and liver was significantly smaller in the study group （P＜0.05）. There was no dramatically pathological change in the tissues of transplanted kidney and liver, which were treated with antiTNFα monoclonal antibody, and the structures are almost normal. ConclusionAntiTNFα monoclonal antibody may reduce cell apoptosis and accelerate the restoration of function of liver and kidney after combined liver and kidney transplantation.
ObjectiveTo do a brief introduction and prospects for simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplanta-tion from aspects of recipient screening, choice of operative method, prognosis, quality of life, and complications. MethodDomestic and international literatures were collected to summary the effect, prognosis, and the latest progress of simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation in the treatment of diabetes. ResultsAs a kind of mature treatment of diabetic with end-stage renal disease, simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation had been carried out in most transplantation centers around the world, it had the definite therapeutic effect and controllable side effects, the life quality of posttransplantation patients would be improved notably. However, the screen of transplantation patient, the selection of transplantation operation, and the postoperative immunosuppressive protocols had not yet been reached a consensus. ConclusionsSimultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation is the most effective treatment for type 1 diabetes patients with end-stage renal disease, it provides a more feasible and more physiological way for the secretion of insulin. Although the patient has to undergo a major operation and take some risk, simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation still improves the patient's survival rate and the quality of life, and reduces the incidence of complications related to diabetes. Based on the above reasons, simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation should be a preferred treatment for all eligible patients.
ObjectiveTo investigate the decision of combined liver and kidney transplantation (CLKT) after renal transplantation, provide surgical therapeutic experience for those patients with liver and renal insufficiencies and hepatorenal syndrome and summarize the risk factors, demerits and merits, and operative indications of CLKT. MethodsThe data of three successful CLKT cases of our centre from Feb. 2014 to Jan 2015 were retrospectively analyzed, and these three patients had kidney transplantation before. We also reviewed the latest associated literatures. ResultsThree patients got successful operations of CLKT and had very good recovery of renal function several days ofter operaton. Two of them discharged a few weeks after surgery, and one of these two patients got severe pulmonary infection of fungus two month after CLKT but recovered under proper therapy finally. The third patient died of severe mixed infection one month after CLKT. ConclusionsThe surgical techniques and rejection are not the main impact factor to the prognosis of CLKT after renal transplantation. Infection is the biggest trouble to which we should pay most of our attention. We should decide whether to do synchronous or nonsynchronous CLKT according to the situation before surgery. Moreover, the systematic therapy administration after CLKT is very necessary for the patients' long-term survival.
ObjectiveTo summarize the perioperative management experience and the treatment strategy of hyperkalemia after simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation (SPK).MethodThe clinical data of patients with diabetes combined with end-stage renal disease who accepted SPK in the Organ Transplantation Center of West China Hospital of Sichuan University from November 2017 to November 2019 were retrospectively analyzed.ResultsA total of 6 patients accepted SPK totally. The cold ischemia time of all allografts was less than 8 h. The levels of fasting blood glucose and serum creatinine were normal in the 5 surviving patients, and the diabetic complications were relieved or improved, except for 1 patient who died of cardiac arrest due to acute left heart failure. There were 1 case of delayed primary renal function recovery, 2 cases of bleeding in the surgical area of pancreas transplantation, 1 case of gastrointestinal bleeding, 3 cases of microthrombosis in the blood vessels of pancreas transplantation, 2 cases of perirenal effusion infection, 2 cases of pulmonary infection, and 1 case of ureterobladder anastomotic leakage, all of which were cured after symptomatic treatment. Only 2 patients occurred hyperkalemia after SPK (the highest level was 6.49 mmol/L and 6.67 mmol/L respectively), and transfusion of 10% glucose injection contain insulin, emergency dialysis and oral fludrocortisone were successively performed on them to restore the potassium density in 1 month and 2 months after surgery. There were no complications of perioperative surgical technical hemorrhage, intestinal leakage, large arteriovenous thrombosis, necrotizing pancreatitis, etc.ConclusionsSPK is the most effective treatment for patients with diabetes combined with end-stage renal disease. Transfusion of 10% glucose injection contain insulin, emergency dialysis, and oral fludrocortisone are effective strategies in treating hyperkalemia after SPK.
ObjectiveTo understand the research progress of treatment of hyperkalemia after simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation (SPK), and to provide the basis for the prevention and treatment of hyperkalemia after SPK.MethodThe relevant literatures about hyperkalemia after SPK in recent years were reviewed.ResultsThe pancreas and kidney that maintained the stability of serum potassium in different ways had been confirmed in current studies. The newly transplanted organ dysfunction after SPK and the use of drugs after SPK both caused hyperkalemia. The treatment principle of hyperkalemia after SPK was to take corresponding prevention and treatment measures according to different reasons.ConclusionsSPK is the best treatment for diabetic renal failure. Postoperative hyperkalemia is one of the most common complications, and timely and correct management is of great significance to the survival and prognosis of patients.
Kidney transplantation is an ideal treatment for patients with end-stage renal disease. Circulating alloantibodies against donor human leukocyte antigens and blood group antigens can impair allografts, shorten allograft survival, and limit access to kidney transplantation. Furthermore, the presence of donor specific antibodies is associated with increased incidence of antibody-mediated rejection and decreased graft survival following transplantation. Plasmapheresis, an extracorporeal therapy directed at removing plasma proteins that has been found to minimize the effects of perioperative sensitization in kidney transplantation. Plasmapheresis enables transplantation across the barrier of ABO blood group incompatibility. In addition, it is also an important approach for the treatment of antibody-mediated rejection. Therefore, studying the application of plasmapheresis in perioperative period of kidney transplantation is expected to increase the chance of transplantation and improve the outcomes following transplantation. This article introduces the application of plasmapheresis in the perioperative period of kidney transplantation.