ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of three-dimensional (3D) printing guide plate on improving femoral rotational alignment and patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty (TKA).MethodsBetween January 2018 and October 2018, 60 patients (60 knees) with advanced knee osteoarthritis who received TKA and met the selection criteria were selected as the study subjects. Patients were randomly divided into two groups according to the random number table method, with 30 patients in each group. The TKA was done with the help of 3D printing guide plate in the guide group and following traditional procedure in the control group. There was no significant difference in gender, age, disease duration, side, and preoperative hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), posterior condylar angle (PCA), patella transverse axis-femoral transepicondylar axis angle (PFA), Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score, and American Knee Society (AKS) score (P>0.05).ResultsAll incisions healed by first intention and no complications related to the operation occurred. All patients were followed up 10-12 months, with an average of 11 months. HSS score and AKS score of the two groups at 6 months after operation were significantly higher than those before operation (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). Postoperative X-ray films showed that the prosthesis was in good position, and no prosthesis loosening or sinking occurred during follow-up. HKA, PCA, and PFA significantly improved in the two groups at 10 months after operation compared with those before operation (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in HKA at 10 months between the two groups (t=1.031, P=0.307). PCA and PFA in the guide group were smaller than those in the control group (P<0.05).ConclusionApplication of 3D printing guide plate in TKA can not only correct the deformity of the knee joint and alleviate the pain symptoms, but also achieve the goal of the accurate femoral rotation alignment and good patellar tracking.
Objective To investigate the accuracy of the modified Akagi line which referenced the patellar tendon at the attachment and the geometrical center point of the tibial osteotomy surface for tibial rotational alignment. Methods Between July 2021 and December 2021, 72 patients who underwent three-dimension (3D) CT for varus osteoarthritis knees were enrolled. Among 72 patients, 18 were male and 54 were female with a mean age of 64.9 years (range, 47-84 years). The preoperative hip-knee-ankle angle ranged from 0° to 26°, with a mean of 9.3°. CT images were imported into Mimics 21.0 medical image control system to establish 3D models of the knees. The prominent point of lateral epicondyle and the medial epicondylar sulcus were identified in femoral 3D models to construct the surgical transepicondylar axis and the vertical line of its projection [anteroposterior (AP) axis]. In tibial 3D models, the patellar tendon at the attachment was used as anatomical landmarks to construct rotational alignment for tibial component, including the line connecting the medial border of the patellar tendon at the attachment (C) and the middle (O) of the posterior cruciate ligament insertion (Akagi line), the line connecting the point C and the geometric center (GC) of the tibial osteotomy plane [medial border axis of the patellar tendon (MBPT)], the line connecting the medial sixth point of the patellar tendon at the attachment and the point GC [medial sixth axis of the patellar tendon (MSPT)], the line connecting the medial third point of the patellar tendon at the attachment and point O [medial third axis of the patellar tendon 1 (MTPT1)], and the line connecting the medial third point of the patellar tendon at the attachment and point GC [medial third axis of the patellar tendon 2 (MTPT2)]. The angles between the five reference axes and the AP axis were measured, and the distribution of the rotational mismatch angles with the AP axis was counted (≤3°, 3°-5°, 5°-10°, and >10°). Results Relative to the AP axis, the Akagi line and MBPT were internally rotated (1.6±5.9)° and (2.4±6.9)°, respectively, while MSPT, MTPT1, and MTPT2 were externally rotated (5.4±6.6)°, (7.0±5.8)°, and (11.9±6.6)°, respectively. There were significant differences in the rotational mismatch angle and its distribution between reference axes and the AP axis (F=68.937, P<0.001; χ2=248.144, P<0.001). The difference between Akagi line and MBPT showed no significant difference (P=0.067), and the differences between Akagi line and MSPT, MTPT1, MTPT2 were significant (P<0.012 5). ConclusionWhen the position of the posterior cruciate ligament insertion can not be accurately identified on total knee arthroplasty, MBPT can be used as the modified Akagi line in reference to the geometrical center point of the tibial osteotomy surface to construct a reliable rotational alignment of the tibial component.