Objective To evaluate the anatomic outcome after lenssparing vitrectomy (LSV) or scleral buckle (SB) for stage 4 retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). MethodsThe clinical data of 39 infants (50 eyes) with 4a (20 eyes) or 4b (30 eyes) were retrospectively analyzed. The age ranged from two to 18 months, with a mean of (6.0±3.4) months. The gestational age ranged from 26 to 33 weeks, with a mean of (30.0±1.6) weeks. The birth weight ranged from 800 to 1900 g, with a mean of (1404.5±237.6) g. Nineteen eyes underwent SB and 31 eyes underwent LSV. Follow-up ranged from 6 to 84 months, with a mean of (26.0±21.7) months. The anatomical and refractive results were reviewed at the final follow-up. ResultsThe anatomic success of SB was 100.0% (19 of 19 eyes) and that of LSV was 87.1% (27 of 31 eyes). Among the patients in whom treatment failed, 4 were in the LSV group (4/31, 12.9%). The buckles of 5 eyes (5/19, 26.3%) were removed. At the end of the followup, the mean myopic refraction was (-4.46±2.49) diopters (ranging from -1.25 to 11.00 diopters) in the LSV group, and (-3.21±1.96) diopters (ranging from -1.25 to 9.25 diopters) in the SB group. There was no significant difference between two groups (F=2.76, P=0.103). ConclusionThe anatomic outcome after LSV or SB for stage 4 ROP was excellent.
Vitrectomy and silicone oil injection were performed for treatment of 43 patients with complicated retinal detachment (RD, n=21 ) or subsequent atrophia bulbi (AB, n=22). Retinal reattachment was achieved in 14 (66.7%) of 21 patients with RD, including 11 with idiopathic proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR),6 with traumatic PVR, 3 with congenital uveal coloboma or Marfan syndrome. The visual acuity was better than 0.05 in 7(50%) of successful cases,and better than 0.02 in 11 (78.6%).Only 6(27.3%) patients had retina reattached with visual improvement in 22 cases of AB, including 13 of traumatic PVR,8 of idiopathic PVR.However,the intraoccular pressure was stable and shrinkage of the globe was controlled in 21 (95.5%) of 22 patients with AB.The results indicate that silicone off injection following vitrectomy may provide advanced severe PVR with a chance of successful treatment. （Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis,1994,10:4-6）
Morning glory syndrome (MGS) is a congenital optic disc anomaly. The characteristic ophthalmoscopic findings consist of a generally enlarged, funnel-shaped and excavated optic disc, surrounded by an elevated annulus of chorioretinal pigment disturbance, with a central glial tuft, multiple narrow branches of retina vessels radiating from the disc. There are peripheral non-perfusion retinal areas in most cases. The pathogenesis of MGS remains unclear. MGS might be associated with many ocular and systemic abnormalities, involving facial, central nervous, cerebrovascular and endocrine systems. Persistent hyperplastic primary vitreous and retinal detachments (RD) are the most common ocular complications of MGS. The mechanism RD in MGS is unclear. Vitrectomy with long-acting gas or silicone tamponade and photocoagulation around the breaks or the enlarged disc might be efficient for rhegmatogenous RD of MGS. Early diagnosis is crucial for recognition and treatment of the ocular and systemic complications, and maintenance of the visual function.
ObjectiveTo observe the effect of non-vitrectomy in the treatment of idiopathic macular epiretinal membranes (IMEM).MethodsThis study is a randomized controlled trial. From December 2017 to December 2018, 60 IMEM patients (60 eyes) diagnosed in Weifang Eye Hospital were included in the study. BCVA, intraocular pressure (IOP) and OCT were performed in all patients. The BCVA examination was performed using the international standard visual acuity chart, which was converted to logMAR. The CMT was measured by OCT. According to the surgical methods, the patients were divided into non-vitrectomy group and control group, 30 patients (30 eyes) in each group. The age (t=1.723), logMAR BCVA (t=1.703), CMT (t=-0.956), IOP (t=-1.434) were not significantly different between the two groups (P=0.090, 0.094, 0.343, 0.157). 23G vitreous cutting system was used in all eyes. The macular epiretinal membranes was removed by non-vitrectomy in the non-vitrectomy group and by vitrectomy in the control group. The relevant examination with the same equipment and methods before the operation at 1 week and 1, 3, 6 months after operation. The time of surgery, the changes of BCVA, CMT and postoperative complications in the two groups were observed comparatively. Variance analysis of repeated measurements was performed for the comparison of BCVA, CMT and IOP after surgery in the two groups. Wilcoxon rank sum test of two independent samples was performed for the degree of vision improvement. The incidence of postoperative complications was compared by χ2 test.ResultsAt 6 months after operation, BCVA increased in 24 eyes (80%) and unchanged in 6 eyes (20%) in the non-vitrectomy group. Compared with preoperative BCVA, the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05). BCVA increased in 25 eyes (83.4%), unchanged in 4 eyes (13.3%) and decreased in 1 eye (3.3%) in the control group. Compared with preoperative BCVA, the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in BCVA improvement degree after operation (Z=－0.26, P＞ 0.05). At 6 months after operation, the average logMAR BCVA was statistically significant compared with the preoperative in the non-vitrectomy group (P=0.002, 0.005) and control group (P=0.004, ＜0.001). Visual stability occurred 1 month after operation in the non-vitrectomy group and 3 months after operation in the control group. The effective operative time of the non-vitrectomy group and control group was 4.50±1.41 and 15.50±2.33 min, respectively. The difference of effective operation time between the two groups was statistically significant (t=－22.12, P＜0.05). After surgery, no significant complications were found in the non-vitrectomy group. In the control group, there were 3 eyes with low IOP and 1 eye with macular hole during operation.ConclusionsNon-vitrectomy and vitrectomy have similar effects on IMEM. Non-vitrectomy has short effective operation time, faster recovery after surgery and no obvious complications.
Objective To analyze the surgical feasibility, operative key points and visual function recovery of scleral buckling in patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) with large or giant retinal hole. Methods RRD patients with large or giant retinal hole who underwent scleral buckling in Chengdu Aidi Eye Hospital between January 1, 2019 and December 31, 2020 were retrospectively selected. The general data, complications and postoperative recovery of the patients were observed. Results A total of 344 inpatients (351 eyes) underwent scleral buckling with RRD, including 43 patients (43 eyes) with retinal detachment of large or giant hole. Among the 43 patients, there were 30 males (30 eyes) and 13 females (13 eyes); 42 cases were successfully operated and got retinal reattachment, and 1 failed. One week later, the patient underwent vitrectomy combined with silicone oil tamponade, and got retinal reattachment. No serious complications occurred in the patients after operation. The visual acuity of most patients improved after surgery. ConclusionsScleral buckling is still an effective method to treat RRD. It is still suitable for more patients as long as they are carefully checked before operation and the operators master the key points of operation. At the same time, more patients’ vitreous bodies can be preserved, and the normal structure and intraocular environment of the eyeball can be maintained.
Objective To observe the clinical effects of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) combined with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling and C3F8 tamponade for patients with highly myopic macular hole (HM-MH) with and without foveoschisis. MethodsA retrospective case controlled study. From January 2017 to February 2022, 23 eyes of 23 patients with highly myopic macular hole with and without foveoschisis diagnosed in the Shandong Eye Hospital were included in the study. Among them, 5 males had 5 eyes, and 18 females had 18 eyes, the age was (54.43±12.96) years old. The patients with or without foveoschisis were 12 eyes in 12 cases and 11 eyes in 11 cases. Studies were divided into two groups, depending on the presence of a concomitant myopic foveoschisis or not. The groups are high myopia macular hole with foveoschisis (group A) and high myopia macular hole without foveoschisis (group B). Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), B-scan ultrasonography, optical coherence tomography and axial length (AL) measurement were performed in all eyes. Snellen chart was used for BCVA examination, and the visual acuity was converted into logarithm of minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) during statistics. The age of the two groups, sex, macular hole (MH) diameter, logMAR BCVA, AL, posterior scleral staphyloma, there was no significant difference (P＞0.05). PPV combined with ILM peeling and C3F8 filling were performed in all eyes. Follow-up was at least 3 months after the last operation. BCVA changes and MH closure were compared between the two groups after surgery. Wilcoxon test was used to compare BCVA before and after operation. Mann-whiteny U test was used to compare preoperative and postoperative BCVA between groups. ResultsAfter initial surgery, MH was closed in 17 of 23 eyes (74%, 17/23). MH was closed in 8 eyes in group A (66.7%, 8/12). Four eyes were not closed (33.3%, 4/12); MH closed in 9 eyes in group B (81.8%, 9/11). There was no significant difference between the two groups after initial operation (P＞0.05). At 1 and 3 months after surgery, the logMAR BCVA of patients in group A and group B were 1.00±0.46, 1.03±0.83 and 0.53±0.63, 0.55±0.41, respectively. Compared with before operation, there was no significant difference at 1 month (P=0.783, 0.358), but the difference was statistically significant at 3 months (P=0.012, 0.007). There was no significant difference in logMAR BCVA between group A and group B at 1 and 3 months after operation (P=0.687, 0.950). ConclusionPPV combined with ILM peeling and C3F8 tamponade can promote MH closure and improve visual acuity in most affected eyes with HM-MH with and without foveoschisis.
Hereditary thyroxine protein amyloidosis (ATTRv) is one of the most common forms of systemic and ocular amyloidosis, characterized by autosomal dominant inheritance, incomplete penetrance, and diverse manifestations. ATTRv deposition leads to visual impairment and even irreversible visual loss, which has a negative impact on the quality of life of patients. The diagnostic rate of pathological examination and genetic testing in ATTRv patients is low, and the detection rate of systemic amyloid lesions is low. We need to increase our awareness of this disease and gain a deeper understanding of its systemic manifestations and corresponding examination methods; genetic testing is conducted on the proband's family to investigate the relationship between different gene mutations and eye manifestations. In the future, multidisciplinary consultations can be conducted to jointly diagnose and treat patients with ATTRv eye involvement, conducting large-scale and long-term follow-up studies on the early clinical characteristics, treatment plans, efficacy, possible complications, and early prevention, in order to improve clinical diagnosis rate, reduce misdiagnosis rate, and improve patient prognosis.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy of preoperative corticosteroids use as an adjunctive treatment for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment associated with choroidal detachment (RRDCD). MethodsA evidence-based medicine study. The National Library of Medicine's PubMed, Web of Science, CNKI, and WanFang database were searched. Clinical controlled studies were selected the study object was RRDCD patients and the interventions were preoperative corticosteroids used as an adjunctive treatment. The search was conducted from January 2000 to January 2022. Duplicated, incomplete, or irrelevant articles were excluded. The conventional meta-analysis was used to evaluate the efficacy of corticosteroids used before surgery. The network meta-analysis was used to directly or indirectly compare the efficacy of oral corticosteroids or intravenous dexamethasone, peribulbar injection of glucocorticoids, prednisolone acetate eye-drops, intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide (TA) and posterior sub-tenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide. Publication bias was evaluated by funnel plot. ResultsAccording to the search strategy, 43 articles were initially retrieved, and 929 eyes of 13 articles were finally included for analysis; 6 and 10 articles were included in the traditional meta-analysis and the network meta-analysis. Among the 6 studies included in the conventional meta-analysis, 5 studies were retrospective and 1 study was a randomized controlled trial, involving a total of 575 eyes. The analysis results showed that there was no significant difference in the primary retinal reattachment rate between the corticosteroids group and the control group [odds ratio (OR)= 1.53, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67-3.53, P=0.314]. Among the 10 studies included in the network meta-analysis, 7 studies were retrospective trials, 2 studies were randomized controlled trials, and 1 study was prospective trial, involving a total of 575 eyes. The analysis results showed that there were significant differences in the primary retinal reattachment rate between the triamcinolone acetonide intravitreal injection group and the no corticosteroid treatment group (OR=4.09, 95%CI 1.06-15.79). Sub-tenon injection triamcinolone acetonide had a higher incidence rate of ocular hypertension than oral glucocorticoid or intravenous dexamethasone (OR= 4.47, 95%CI 1.42-14.13). ConclusionsTriamcinolone acetonide intravitreal injection before surgery can improve the primary retinal reattachment rate in RRDCD patients. Patients with the posterior sub-tenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide should be alert to elevated intraocular pressure.
ObjectiveTo observe the effectiveness and safety of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) combined with inner limiting membrane (ILM) removal and 41G microneedle subretinal injection of balanced salt solution (BSS) in the treatment of refractory macular hole. MethodsA prospective clinical study. From January to June 2023, 20 cases (20 eyes) of refractory macular hole patients diagnosed through examination at The Affiliated Eye Hospital of Nanchang University were included in the study. The basal diameter of the affected eye's basal diameter (BD) was ＞1 000 μm. Macular hole index (MHI) was ＜0.5. The affected eye received treatment with 23G PPV combined with ILM removal and 41G microneedle subretinal injection of BSS. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), microperimetry, and optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) were performed before and 1, 2, 3, and 6 months after surgery for the affected eye. BCVA examination was performed using standard logarithmic visual acuity chart, and convert it to logarithmic minimum resolution angle (logMAR) visual acuity for statistical purposes. MP-3 microperimetry was used for micro view examination, record the mean sensitivity (MS) of the retinal within a 12° range of the fovea. OCTA was used to measure the area of the avascular zone of the macula (FAZ), perimeter of the FAZ (PERIM), retinal vascular length density (VLD), and vascular perfusion density (VPD). The changes in BCVA, MS, FAZ area, PERIM, VLD, VPD before and after surgery were compared and analyzed. After the same time, the closure of macular hole and the occurrence of complications after surgery were observed. Single factor analysis of variance was used to compare the observation indicators at different times before and after surgery. The correlation between various observation indicators and preoperative minimum diameter (MD), BD, and hiatus height at 6 months after surgery were analyzed using Pearson correlation analysis. ResultsAmong the 20 cases with 20 eyes, there were 2 males with 2 eyes and 18 females with 18 eyes. Age was (61.45±8.56) years old. The logMAR BCVA, MS, FAZ area, PERIM, VLD, and VPD of the affected eye were 1.46±0.21, (16.20±5.81) dB、(0.40±0.17) mm2, (2.89±0.99) mm, (6.23±3.59) mm−1, (0.17±0.10)%, respectively. Six months after surgery, out of 20 eyes, macular hole closure and incomplete closure were 18 (90.0%, 18 /20) and 2 (10.0%, 2 /20) eyes, respectively. The logMAR BCVA, MS, FAZ area, PERIM, VLD, and VPD were 0.80±0.20, (22.20±4.60) dB, (0.18±0.10) mm2, (1.83±0.80) mm, (9.54±2.88) mm−1, (0.31±0.14)%. Compared with before surgery, the differences were statistically significant (P＜0.05). The correlation analysis results showed a positive correlation (P＜0.05) between preoperative BD and postoperative 6-month PERIM and VPD. There was a negative correlation between preoperative MD and postoperative VLD at 6 months (P＜0.05). There was a negative correlation between preoperative MHI and logMAR BCVA and VPD at 6 months after surgery (P＜0.05). No complications such as elevated or decreased intraocular pressure, damage to retinal pigment epithelium, retinal hemorrhage, endophthalmitis, or retinal detachment occurred after surgery in all affected eyes. ConclusionMinimally invasive PPV combined with ILM removal and 41G microneedle subretinal injection of BSS can effectively improve the closure rate of refractory macular hole patients in the short term, improve vision, and have good safety.
Objective To observe the clinical efficacy of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) combined with dexamethasone intravitreal implant (DEX) in the treatment of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). MethodsA prospective randomized controlled study. A total of 57 PDR patients with 79 eyes diagnosed by Department of Ophthalmology of The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from May 2021 to February 2023 were included in the study. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) were performed in all affected eyes. Central macular thickness (CMT) was measured by OCT. The patients were randomly divided into control group and experimental group, with 27 cases and 35 eyes and 30 cases and 44 eyes, respectively. All eyes were treated with routine 25G PPV and intraoperative whole-retina laser photocoagulation. At the end of the operation, the experimental group was given 0.7 mg DEX intravitreal injection. At 1, 4, 12, and 24 weeks after operation, the same equipment and methods were used for relevant examinations. The improvement after surgery was assessed according to the diabetic retinopathy severity score (DRSS). Mixed analysis of variance was used to compare logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution BCVA and CMT between the two groups and within the two groups before and after operation. ResultsAt 1, 4, 12 and 24 weeks after surgery, BCVA was significantly improved at different time points after surgery, and the differences were statistically significant (P＜0.001). At different time after operation, BCVA and CMT in experimental groups were significantly better than that in control group, with statistical significance (P＜0.05). Compared with the CMT before surgery, the CMT at all time point after surgery in experimental group were significantly decreased, and the difference were statistically significant (P＜0.05). There was no significant difference one week after eye operation in control group (P=0.315). At 4, 12 and 24 weeks after operation, CMT decreased in control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P＜0.05). Compared with before surgery, DRSS increased two steps higher at 1, 4, 12 and 24 weeks after surgery in 20 (45.45%, 20/44), 26 (59.10%, 26/44), 32 (72.73%, 32/44) and 31 (70.45%, 31/44) eyes in the experimental groups, respectively. The control group consisted of 15 (42.86%, 15/35), 15 (42.86%, 15/35), 16 (45.71%, 16/35) and 18 (51.43%, 18/35) eyes, respectively. There was no significant difference in DRSS at 1, 4 and 24 weeks after operation between the control group and the experimental group (P=0.817, 0.178, 0.105). At 12 weeks after surgery, the difference was statistically significant (P=0.020). ConclusionPPV combined with intravitreal injection of DEX in the treatment of PDR can improve postoperative visual acuity, alleviate postoperative macular edema and improve the severity of DR.