ObjectiveTo investigate the efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) in patients with refractory magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-negative epilepsy and to evaluate potential clinical predictors. MethodsA retrospective collection of efficacy data was conducted on 24 patients with intractable MRI-negative epilepsy treated with VNS, who were followed up for more than six months, at Beijing Tiantan Hospital and Beijing Fengtai Hospital from January 2016 to September 2023. Patients were divided into two subgroups based on their response to VNS: responders (≥50% reduction in seizure frequency) and non-responders (<50% reduction in seizure frequency). The relationship between preoperative clinical data and VNS efficacy was further analyzed to identify potential predictors of VNS efficacy. ResultsA total of 24 patients were included, with an average age of (14.26±8.39) years old. Seizure frequency was reduced by more than 50% in 37.5% of patients, and 8.3% of patients achieved seizure-free after VNS treatment. Preoperative seizure frequency and interictal epileptiform discharge type were significantly associated with VNS efficacy (P<0.05). Multivariate regression analysis showed that a monthly seizure frequency of less than 100 and focal interictal epileptiform discharges were independent predictors of VNS efficacy (P<0.05). ConclusionVNS is an effective treatment for patients with refractory MRI-negative epilepsy. Lower monthly seizure frequency and focal interictal epileptiform discharges are potential predictors of VNS efficacy. These findings provide important references for clinicians in selecting and evaluating patients for VNS treatment.
ObjectiveTo investigate the efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) in the treatment of refractory epilepsy in children and the key factors affecting its efficacy. MethodsThe clinical data of 22 children with drug-resistant epilepsy who received VNS treatment in the Second People's Hospital of Hunan Province from January 2016 to April 2023 were analyzed. The average seizure reduction rate, effective rate and McHugh grade were used to evaluate the efficacy of VNS after at least 1 year follow-up. Patients with an attack reduction rate of ≥50% were defined as respondents, and Mann-Witney U test and χ2 test were used, respectively, to conduct univariate and multifactor Logistics regression analysis with statistically significant indicators (P<0.05). ResultsAmong the 22 patients, the average attack reduction rate was 12.66% at 1 month, 26.10% at 3 months, 37.47% at 6 months, 48.18% at 9 months and 54.38% at 12 months. The effective rate was 5.00%, 9.00%, 36.00%, 50.00% and 68.00%, respectively. 12 months after operation, there were 3 cases of grade I, 12 cases of grade II, 7 cases of grade III, and 0 cases of grade V. Unifactorial and multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that the curative effect of epilepsy in children was related to the seizure type, among which the curative effect of general seizure was better than that of focal seizure (OR=0.062, P=0.014), and the curative effect of myoclonic seizure and tonic seizure was better than that of other types in general seizure. ConclusionThe clinical effect of VNS in the treatment of refractory epilepsy in children is time cumulative, and the surgical effect of myoclonic seizures and tonic seizures in general seizures is better.