To observe the change in plasma endotoxin and cytokine during the early period of intra-abdominal infection (IAI) complicated by multiple system organ dysfunction (MSOD) in animals. Twenty rabbits were randomly divided in to two groups. One group received the operation of cecal ligation plus puncture (CLP) inducing IAI complicated by MSOD, and another group received sham operation as a control. All animals were placed in metabolic cages and maintained with intravenous infusion for one week. Plasma levels of endotoxin and cytokine (TNF, IL-1, IL-6) were determined seperately at the beginning (0 hour) or 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 24 hours after CLP. Blood bacteria cultures and pathological examination of several organs were made when the animal was dead or killed. Results: The levels of plasma endotoxin, TNF and IL-6 were found to be significantly increased at one or two hours after CLP, the incidence rate of bacteriemia was 80% and the pathological alterations in the abdomen and organs were remarkale, with an average survival time of 84.1±39.0 hours in CLP group. No change in plasma IL-1 level was found in the CLP group. Conclusion: The plasma levels of endotoxin and cytokine (TNF and IL-6) do increase in the early period of IAI complicated by MSOD, and the change in plasma IL-1 is not obvious.
To evaluate the development prevention and treatment of pneumonic injury after operation on aged patients with abdominal infection. We analyzed 77 aged patients (＞60 y) admitted from Jan. 1991 to Dec. 1992: 38 cases of which with abdominal infection (infection group), 39 cases without abdominal infection (non-infection group). All patients were given oxygen therapy and continuous SaO2 monitoring. Results: There were 28 patients with hypoxemia (SaO2＜95%) in infection group, with an occurrence rate of 73.7%. In non-infection group (12 patients), the rate of hyoxemia was 30.8%, which has significant difference between two groups (Ｐ＜0.001). All patients with hypoxemia were given oxygen therapy and 31 patients′ SaO2 was elevated. The efficient rate was 77.5%. Other 9 patients developed ARDS, the rate was 2.5% (9/40). In the infection group 8 patients developed ARDS with an occurrence rate of 21.1%. There was one patient with ARDS in the non-infection group, the rate was 2.6%. There was significant difference between two group (Ｐ＜0.05). Conclusions: The results suggest that hypoxemia is liable to occur in aged patients with abdominal infection after operation and these patients were liable to develop ARDS. Oxygen therapy and SaO2 monitoring is the important managements to these patients in prevention of pneumonic injury.
Objective To investigate the main characteristics of intro-abdominal microbial infection and the risk factors for it after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Methods Clinical data of 200 patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy at the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University from Sep. 2008 to Sep. 2013 were reviewed retrospectively to investigate the main characteristics of abdominal microbial infection after pancreaticoduodenectomy and risk factors for it. Results Of the 200 patients, cultures of drainage fluids were positive in 78 patients, and 42 of them(21.0%) met the diagnosis of intra-abdominal infection criterion. One hundred and eighty-five pathogenic strains were isolated totally, 64 strains of them(34.6%) were Gram positive cocci, 103 strains(55.7%) were Gram negative bacilli, and 18 strains (9.7%) were fungus. The top 5 kinds of bacteria in order were Staphylococcus aureus(31 strains), Pseudomonas aemginosa(28 strains), Escherichia co1i(22 strains), Klebsiella pneumoniae(18 strains), and Enterococcus faecium (14 strains). Most of the pathogens were resistant to broad-spectrum antibiotics. The resistance rate of Pseudomonas aeruginosa was 60.7%(17/28) to imipenem. Extended spectrum beta lactamases(ESBLs)-producing strains accounted for 22.7%(5/22) and 33.3%(6/18) in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae respectively. The detection rate of methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus(MRSA) was 45.2%(14/31) in Staphylococcus aureus. Multivariate logistic regression analysis results showed that status of pancreatic fistula and pulmonary infection were the risk factors for intraabdominal infection, patients with high grade of pancreatic fistula(OR=16.252, P=0.003) and with pulmonary infection (OR=2.855, P=0.017) had higher incidence of intra-abdominal infection. Conclusion Gram negative bacilli is the main pathogenic bacteria of abdominal drainage fluids cultivation of microbiology after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Most of them have multi-drug resistance characteristic. Positive prevention and treatment of pancreatic fistula and pulmonary infection can reduce the incidence of intra-abdominal infection.
Objective To summarize experience and efficacy of multidisciplinary treatment for severe intra-abdominal infection. Methods The clinical data of 17 patients with severe intra-abdominal infection underwent multidisciplinary treatment were analyzed retrospectively. There were 5 cases of severe acute pancreatitis, 4 cases of postoperative biliary fistula, 2 cases of intestinal fistula, 2 cases of pancreatic trauma, 1 case after resection for intestinal necrosis, 1 case of abdominal trauma, 1 case after operation for liver abscess, 1 case of unexplained severe intra-abdominal infection. The experiences of multidisciplinary treatment including the intensive care unit (ICU), surgery, blood purification center, and departments of pharmacy, nutrition, and digestion and internal medicine, and so on were summarized. Results After multidisciplinary treatment, 13 patients were cured, of which 4 patients treated by non-open operation. Three patients died, including 1 patient died of infectious shock, 1 patient died of pancreatic bed bleeding, 1 patient died of multiple organ failure. There was 1 case of automatic discharge. Conclusions Multidisciplinary treatment including ICU, surgery, blood purification center, and departments of pharmacy, nutrition, and digestion and internal medicine, and so on has an exact clinical curative effect in patients with severe intra-abdominal infection. Concept of damage control should be followed by surgical intervention. Abdominal cavity puncture and drainage has some advantages of small trauma and good clinical effect, which is suitable for infection control of patients with severe intra-abdominal infection, it could provide surgical condition and opportunity for patients required further surgical treatment.
ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical significance of ultrasound-guided puncture and catheterization combined with choledochoscopy for debridement and drainage in treatment of patients with severe intra-abdominal infection (SIAI).MethodsThe clinical data of 7 patients with SIAI who underwent the debridement and drainage under ultrasound-guided puncture and catheterization combined with choledochoscopy from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2017 in this hospital were retrospectively analyzed. The drainage sinus tracts were dilated for all patients. Then the choledochoscope was inserted into the infected areas along the dilated sinus tract. Finally, the drainage tube was placed under the guidance of the choledochoscope.ResultsOf the 7 patients, 6 patients were cured by this treatment, 1 case was converted to open surgery because the symptoms of illness were not improved. No relevant complications occurred. All patients were discharged after improvement of the disease. Currently, all cases were survival and no infection remained or recurred after follow-up to June 28, 2019.ConclusionsUltrasound-guided puncture and catheterization combined with choledochoscopy for debridement and drainage in treatment of SIAI is simple, safe, and effective. It could be used as an effective treatment for SIAI or alternative to open surgery.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of unconventional abdominal drainage after laparoscopic hepatectomy.MethodsThe clinicopathologic data of patients who underwent laparoscopic hepatectomy for liver tumors in the Mianyang Central Hospital from June to December 2019 and met the inclusion criteria were retrospectively collected. Based on whether drainage tube was placed in the abdominal cavity during operation, the patients were divided into non-catheterized group (without drainage tube) and catheterized group (with drainage tube). The intraoperative data and postoperative complications (e.g. intraabdominal hemorrhage, bile leakage, abdominal infection, and liver failure) were compared between the two groups. Then, the intraoperative data and postoperative conditions of liver cancer and non-liver cancer patients with or without abdominal drainage tube were compared and analyzed.ResultsA total of 117 eligible patients were included in the study. The non-catheterized group had 59 patients and the catheterized group had 58 patients. The patients with liver cancer had 84 patients (44 non-catheterized patients and 40 catheterized patients) and the patients without liver cancer had 33 patients (15 non-catheterized patients and 18 catheterized patients). ① On the whole, the groups were comparable in the baseline data between the non-catheterized group and the catheterized group, such as gender, age, HBV infection, body mass index, hepatic function index, liver stiffness value, disease category, etc. (P>0.05). Compared with the catheterized group, the non-catheterized group had earlier off-bed activities and earlier flatus time (P<0.001), and shorter postoperative hospital stay (P=0.030). However, no statistically significant differences were found in other indicators between the two groups (P>0.05). ② Whether the patients had liver cancer or not, the non-catheterized patients still had earlier off-bed activities and earlier flatus time as compared with the catheterized patients (P<0.001). Among the patients with liver cancer, no difference was found in postoperative hospital stay. However, among the patients without liver cancer, the non-catheterized patients had shorter postoperative hospital stay than the catheterized patients (P=0.042). No statistically significant differences were found in other indicators between the catheterized patients and non-catheterized patients (P>0.05).ConclusionFor technologically skilled laparoscopic hepatectomy center, selectively not placing peritoneal drainage tube after surgery might better promote the health of patients.
ObjectiveTo explore the risk factors, pathophysiological mechanism, pathogenic bacteria distribution, diagnosis, and treatment of postoperative intra-abdominal infection, and to provide a theoretical basis for further understanding the mechanism and treatment of postoperative intra-abdominal infection.MethodThe related literatures in PubMed, CNKI, WanFang, and other databases were searched to summarize the research progress of postoperative intra-abdominal infection.ResultsPostoperative intra-abdominal infection was associated with a variety of risk factors, and timely identification and control were conducive to the prevention of intra-abdominal infection. Postoperative intra-abdominal infection had a complex pathophysiological mechanism, mainly involving changes in the immune system, which provided a target for immunotherapy. Pathogenic bacteria were widely distributed in postoperative intra-abdominal infection, and the problem of drug resistance was also a big problem nowadays. In the treatment of postoperative intra-abdominal infection, comprehensive treatment measures should be taken to control the infection, in which the control of the source of infection was the basis and played a key role.ConclusionsThe treatment of postoperative intra-abdominal infection needs to be more individualized and refined, and comprehensive treatment measures such as controlling the source of infection, nutrition therapy, organ function support, and so on, should be taken. Immunotherapy is a new potential treatment measure.