目的 探讨精神科心身病房优质护理服务模式及效果。 方法 2010年7月起心身病房加入优质护理活动，通过了解患者对优质护理的需求，结合精神科专业特色，从培训和提高护理人员业务能力着手，实行医护共同交班制、共同查房制、开展思维纠正和行为训练、加强康复指导等措施建立优质护理服务模式，并对优质护理的效果以满意度进行评价。 结果 患者对优质护理的希望与要求集中反映在主动热情服务、沟通好、康复治疗效果好等方面；实施优质护理服务后，患者、医生及护士的满意度均有不同程度上升。 结论 心身病房开展优质护理服务，能有效满足患者的需求和体验，提高护士的专科护理技能，达到患者、医生、护士共同满意的良好效果。
【摘要】 目的 评估四川省精神科专科医师培训基地带教师资培训效果、培训方式及提出建议。 方法 对2009年10月和2010年11月的两次培训均参加的59名带教师资采用自制评估表进行评估，其中男37名，女22名；年龄（39±9）岁。采用SPSS 13.0统计软件进行统计分析。 结果 参与培训带教师资对培训的效果总体评价，好22名，占37.29%，很好18名，占30.51%；对培训方式的总体评价，好25名，占42.37%，很好20名，占33.91%；参训教师各个方面较培训前均有显著提高。 结论 开展短期方式多样的集中培训可能是提高带教师资水平的一种快速途径。应该建立师资准入制度考核标准和标准培训内容，从而建立起一支高素质的精神专科医师培训的带教师资，保障精神专科医师培训的质量和顺利进行。【Abstract】 Objective To assess the results and styles of training process for faculty doctors in psychiatric specialist training center of Sichuan Province, and put forward suggestions. Methods We evaluated 59 psychiatric specialist training faculty doctors, including 37 males and 22 females aged (39±9) years old by giving out a self-made questionnaire. Factor analysis was done by adopting SPSS 13.0. Results Evaluation of the training results showed good in 22 doctors (37.29%), and very good in 18 doctors (30.51%); Evaluation of the training style showed good in 25 doctors (42.37%) and very good in 20 doctors (33.91%). After training, the faculty doctors got more progress than before in every aspects. Conclusions Short-term training with various training styles may be a quick way for faculty doctors in psychiatric specialist training center to increase their teaching ability. The standard enrollment criteria, standard training contents and standard exam criteria should be established. Through this, a high-quality faculty doctors in psychiatric specialist training center will be set up, which is very important in ensuring the quality and success of training for psychiatric specialist doctors.
ObjectiveTo investigate Chinese psychiatrists' mental health. MethodsLiteratures published from January 1989 to March 31, 2013 were searched through Chinese network databases (CNKI, Weipu, Wanfang) and English network database (OVID). Factors of Symptom checklist-90 (SCL-90) were extracted and compared with Chinese norm. These were analyzed by Meta analysis method. ResultsEleven articles were obtained and analyzed, including 725 psychiatrists. The research illustrated that the differences between psychiatrists and Chinese norm of somatization[WMD=0.19, 95%CI (0.05, 0.33), P=0.008], depression[WMD=0.25, 95%CI (0.06, 0.43), P=0.009], anxiety[WMD=0.28, 95%CI (0.09, 0.47), P=0.004], hostility[WMD=0.15, 95%CI (0.01, 0.30), P=0.03], and phobia[WMD=0.11, 95%CI (0.02, 0.20), P=0.02] were significant, while the other 4 factors were not significant (P>0.05). ConclusionPsychiatrists' mental health is poor and intervention measures need to be adopted to improve psychiatrists' mental health.